|
Would you vote Bush or Kerry? (pg. 4)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| VERTiG0 |
| quote: | Originally posted by dEsidEL
what about Nader ?
|
He's a stupid jerkface and ruined cool cars like the Corvair. |
|
|
| dance2dabeat |
I AM CANADIAN....
so i honestly haven;t even given it a thought or really care for that matter. I hate politics!!!!!!!! |
|
|
| dEsidEL |
| quote: | Originally posted by dance2dabeat
I AM CANADIAN....
so i honestly haven;t even given it a thought or really care for that matter. I hate politics!!!!!!!! |
hey that's ok, i'm Canadian too!
|
|
|
| e*motion |
| quote: | Originally posted by joefingers
as bad as bush is i would pick him.....kerry can't make a firm decision on anyting |
bush cant make the RIGHT decision about anything. :rolleyes: |
|
|
| Cyrus King |
| quote: | Originally posted by rabbitjoker
look at all the experts....
"Hi, I'm from Canada - that makes me an expert on American domestic matters, thank you." |
Look at Bush.. he didnt care about his DOMESTIC security.. you got 9/11
and after that... he still didnt care.. he attacked another country and spent 200 billion of hard earned middle class taxes on occcuptation.. which by the way has opened the gates of hell there.
Where are those weapons? |
|
|
| d!abolic |
| quote: | Originally posted by Cyrus King
Look at Bush.. he didnt care about his DOMESTIC security.. you got 9/11 |
The mistakes were made during Clinton's term, not his. Clinton's the one who ignored all the warning signs and did nothing about the Taliban. 9/11 happened right after Bush took over. There's little he could have done. But at least he DID go after the Taliban and Hussein. If he didn't and we'd get attacked by one of them during his second term, you'd blame that on him because he didn't act during the first. There's no point in trying to make people like you happy. All you see is your prejudice, your hatred. You're blinded by it and unable to respond to reason and logic. Your reply to my post will confirm this.
edit: don't bother replying, i just saw your sig. That's evidence enough that i'm right about you. |
|
|
| Cyrus King |
| quote: | Originally posted by d!abolic
The mistakes were made during Clinton's term, not his. Clinton's the one who ignored all the warning signs and did nothing about the Taliban. 9/11 happened right after Bush took over. There's little he could have done. But at least he DID go after the Taliban and Hussein. If he didn't and we'd get attacked by one of them during his second term, you'd blame that on him because he didn't act during the first. There's no point in trying to make people like you happy. All you see is your prejudice, your hatred. You're blinded by it and unable to respond to reason and logic. Your reply to my post will confirm this.
edit: don't bother replying, i just saw your sig. That's evidence enough that i'm right about you. |
thanks for the laugh buddy.
Another stupid moron claiming Saddam would attack us.. cuas he was a grave danger to us half way across the world
Bish had a whole year and a half to secure his nation.. dont blame this all on Clinton's "mistakes"
Get real and remove these paranoid delusions that youve been brainwadhed to believe by the Bush Admin out of your head
Do you have water stocked up in the basement incase of a terrorist attack..hahaahhah
edit: go get nipple surgery |
|
|
| rabbitjoker |
| quote: | Originally posted by Cyrus King
Where are those weapons? |
In uranus. |
|
|
| Fir3start3r |
| quote: | Originally posted by Cyrus King
Look at Bush.. he didnt care about his DOMESTIC security.. you got 9/11
|
So....wait for the next attack??
How many attacks must they endur before they actually do anything???? Unlike the Clinton administration that sat on their ing asses and did nothing and then came 9/11...
9/11 wasn't the only that happened to them; that was the straw that broke the camels back.
Go do some homework or something...
| quote: |
and after that... he still didnt care.. he attacked another country
|
Wow, someone really don't understand the situation here at all.
It wasn't a country they were after; never was.
Saddam was front and center all the time.
The country in question is now liberated and can choose their own destiny without being suppressed by a ruthless, draconian dictator.
| quote: |
and spent 200 billion of hard earned middle class taxes
|
There's no denying the staggering cost that's for sure.
Occupation? The U.S. has no intension of occupation; where the hell did that idea come from? Too many movies maybe?
I guess with that train of thought, that would make Kuwait occupied and part of the evil American Empire when they walked in there during Desert Storm too huh?
| quote: |
which by the way has opened the gates of hell there.
|
Again....too many movies and a real bad cliche... |
|
|
| Cyrus King |
| quote: | Originally posted by Fir3start3r
So....wait for the next attack??
How many attacks must they endur before they actually do anything???? Unlike the Clinton administration that sat on their ing asses and did nothing and then came 9/11...
9/11 wasn't the only that happened to them; that was the straw that broke the camels back.
Go do some homework or something... |
I guess they should take over the world considering AL qaueda is not solely in one coutnry but spread around the world. Even if they took over the world.. more attacks would happen.. get it? Terrrorism will always win as long as state terrorists are in power.
Ive done my homework quite a bit.
Oh yeah.... who trained the Taliban and OSAMA during the Afghan/Russo war???
Learn your bitch
| quote: |
Wow, someone really don't understand the situation here at all.
It wasn't a country they were after; never was.
Saddam was front and center all the time.
The country in question is now liberated and can choose their own destiny without being suppressed by a ruthless, draconian dictator. |
One question...WHERE ARE THE WEAPONS THAT BUSH CLAIMED THERE WAS "UNDENIABLE PROOF" EXISTED?????
Liberated? Yeah.. 100 000 innocents killed were liberated...the millions that cant leave their homes were liberated... the insurgents and anti-american squads that indirectly control their neighborhoods like mafia's are helping with the liberation. The daily bombing campaigns are liberating.
Get real
| quote: |
There's no denying the staggering cost that's for sure. |
Money scientists and researchers said could cure AIDS and many cancers!
| quote: |
Occupation? The U.S. has no intension of occupation; where the hell did that idea come from? Too many movies maybe?
I guess with that train of thought, that would make Kuwait occupied and part of the evil American Empire when they walked in there during Desert Storm too huh?
Again....too many movies and a real bad cliche... |
Bush even said it himself that they have OCCUPIED iraq. It wasnt there intention to occupy it? Just bomb the living out of the place, remove saddam and walk away? you thought that they thought it was this easy?
Multibillion dollar contracts have been rewarded to Bush's friends and daddy's freinds.
They will enjoy that money as poor young americans are forced to protect their assets with their lives. |
|
|
| dEsidEL |
lol .. i love TOTA crossfire, same players same game
|
|
|
|
|
