|
America(2005) vs Rome (when they were big)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| DjShlian |
Who would win in a war? America or Rome?
Rome had Julius Caesar, who was the worlds greatest swordsman. But America has a really good navy. |
|
|
| dj_bas |
| yeah a navy, not to mention guns, and even if we didn't use guns im sure we could get bigger swords |
|
|
| Nautilus |
| Hmm. America does have an ominous arsenal of nuclear weapons. But the Romans have balls wearing dress-like clothes to the battle field. Romans! |
|
|
| Billabong |
| Well considering the two countries had never heard of each other at the point in time, how could this ever happen :) And why would you compare a old world empire to a new world empire :) which is more technologically advance, its not like poor rome would have a chance. |
|
|
| Matt |
| well if Julius was the world's best sworsman, he sure got his ass kicked. |
|
|
| Floorfiller |
| Sparta because they have brad pitt |
|
|
| jp |
Asterix & Obelix would win :o
 |
|
|
| N|te-L|fe |
| wtf is this? are we really talking 20first century weapons vs Swords and bow? :conf: |
|
|
| Billche |
| 1 american with enough bullets could take out a large chunk of the army. If they were on even footing (using the same weapons), I would go with Rome. They had more discipline back then. |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by jp
Asterix & Obelix would win :o
|
They wouldn't win - they would manage to keep their village safe both from Romans and Americans. |
|
|
| Billabong |
| quote: | Originally posted by Billche
1 american with enough bullets could take out a large chunk of the army. If they were on even footing (using the same weapons), I would go with Rome. They had more discipline back then. |
They hard archers and calvary you do know, and artilary weapons. |
|
|
|
|
