|
Xone 92 vs Vestax CX (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| A83 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Zild
I already said we should ban this guy a long time ago. So can we please ban him. Hey kid nobody thinks the V6 is better just because it has rotaries. I'm not going to take the time to explain why the V6 is such a pimpdaddy mixer or why Urei 1620s are awesome but maybe someday when you grow up a little you'll figure it out for yourself. Your total is $39.99 k thx plz drive thru
Oh yeah can we please ban this guy if he's not going to contribute anything meaningful to the DJ Booth forum. People might even read his threads and accidently take his childish advice. |
If the V6 didn't have rotaries, nobody would buy it. By Karls post, I know 100%, it'll be better than the v6 and any urei mixer.
Why should anybody believe what you say? You an alcoholic...why believe you. TA is just a bunch of drunk blazed people running around arguing with eachother and starting a bunch of crap. |
|
|
| beats and beeps |
| quote: | Originally posted by A83
You just bash me whenever I say anything. I know i'm correct and you know i'm correct also. You just like to say Pioneer will suck because it's not as 'pretty' and doesn't have pretty led lights on it.
|
First of all I own two pioneer cdj 800s, so I in no way say anything pioneer puts out sucks. Also, the CX has alot less leds on it than the djm1000 does. If anything I would say the djm1000 is one of the "prettiest" mixers out there.
^ Doesnt have many pretty lights compared to the djm1000.
And again, I own 2 cdjs, and have owned a djm300, so dont say I'm biased against pioneer, they are fine manufacturers.
Now, I think many people on this board would appreciate it if you would make another thread like this one. Except on this board.
http://www.pioneerprodjforums.com/u...sb=5&o=&fpart=1 |
|
|
| A83 |
I didn't make this. If you posted it on the ppdj forum. I know they'll say it is the best mixer, because it indeed is. When all the really big clubs have a DJM 1000, free free to pm me to tell me that I was correct. |
|
|
| SUNWmsf |
My personal opinion is that a high end analog system would blow away a high end digital system in the club environment. Just can't beat that analog sound.... I just don't think digital is ready to take over analog (audiophile-wise). But that's just my opinion.
(hope I don't get flamed for saying that analog sound is superior to digital sound.) |
|
|
| beats and beeps |
| quote: | Originally posted by A83
I didn't make this. If you posted it on the ppdj forum. I know they'll say it is the best mixer, because it indeed is. When all the really big clubs have a DJM 1000, free free to pm me to tell me that I was correct. |
First of all its not going to be the best mixer, sound quality isnt everything, cant you grasp that concept? The cx is heaven for me because I mix techno on 3 Sources, The djm1000 would be hell for this. If I'm using 3 sources I want 3 channels not 6, they are just going to me up. The eq knobs are too small to be fooling with, not to mention touch faders are too cumbersome to be mixing from 3 sources with.
Besides, so what if all the big clubs have the DJM 1000, thats because its made by pioneer. Pioneer always works its gear into clubs. The djm600 is in "all the big clubs" does that make it the best mixer?
The best mixer isnt proven by a list of specs you can rip off of another source.
Btw, you seem to fail to grasp what I was trying to say, I was not refering to this thread, I was saying I wish you would post a thread like this one ---> Yes, thats right this thread. <---
Except on tranceaddict.com |
|
|
| djtrinity |
| quote: | Originally posted by SUNWmsf
My personal opinion is that a high end analog system would blow away a high end digital system in the club environment. Just can't beat that analog sound.... I just don't think digital is ready to take over analog (audiophile-wise). But that's just my opinion.
(hope I don't get flamed for saying that analog sound is superior to digital sound.) |
for anyway curious on the subject:
http://www.wavemusic.com/community/...=&threadid=3891 |
|
|
| DannyO |
| quote: | Originally posted by A83
If the V6 didn't have rotaries, nobody would buy it. By Karls post, I know 100%, it'll be better than the v6 and any urei mixer.
Why should anybody believe what you say? You an alcoholic...why believe you. TA is just a bunch of drunk blazed people running around arguing with eachother and starting a bunch of crap. |
Yea, your really showing your intelligence in a post like this.
As for the mixer, it won't be crap, but what things say on paper and how they perform in the real world are 2 different things, the DJX700 looked awesome on paper, in really life, well umm NO.
This mixer WILL make its way into clubs as that Pioneers strategy, they will give them to the big clubs for free, so why wouldn't the big clubs have them.
This mixer being the best is YOUR OPINION, its not fact, to most Audiophiles who are all about sound, I guarentee they wouldn't want to touch this, they would all be about the Bozak or Urei as it keeps the original signal fromt he vinyl as close to the original as possible, not like a digital mixer that will convert and chance the singal in all sorts of ways.
IMO this mixer is really all about being great with its sound, but I still don't think it will beat the heavy weight analog mixers, and as for features, its nice if your into video stuff with DVJs or the like, but in every other department it is just average, and looks wise it looks like crap to me. |
|
|
| Zild |
| quote: | Originally posted by A83
If the V6 didn't have rotaries, nobody would buy it. By Karls post, I know 100%, it'll be better than the v6 and any urei mixer.
Why should anybody believe what you say? You an alcoholic...why believe you. TA is just a bunch of drunk blazed people running around arguing with eachother and starting a bunch of crap. |
You're so stupid I bet your parents are ashamed. |
|
|
| Derivative |
| quote: | | Why should anybody believe what you say? You an alcoholic...why believe you. TA is just a bunch of drunk blazed people running around arguing with eachother and starting a bunch of crap. |
 |
|
|
| A83 |
| The 1000 can mix in digital or analog ;) |
|
|
| ESMdjm600 |
| guys come on now... name calling is just an excuse for lack of intellectual substance |
|
|
| ESMdjm600 |
| i dunno i personally felt that anyone that was loyal to pioneer and decided to wait for the next update so to speak of the djm600, really got ed in the ass by pioneer.... its like they decided to go exclusive club version that no one one for home use would consider to buy based on price range, its as if they said to themselves "lets stop trying to directly compete with those 4 ch. mixers in the 1000-1500 dollar range cuz we cant seem to do it... i mean look at it, denon brought their on, so did ecler, and so did a&h as of late, everyone was expecting pioneers next 1000 dollar 4 ch. mixer to see how well it would compete with the 92, the 1500 and the nuo5.... it seems pioneers strategy was to do watever they could to avoid those comparisons, and they did it by making their next mixer of a different class than those mixers... |
|
|
|
|
