|
Oh no not another Creationist thread... (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| igottaknow |
| I like your idea Renegade. Yes it's twisted and radical, but that's what we need. :eyespop: |
|
|
| Shakka |
| quote: | Originally posted by shaolin_Z
Intentionally misleading ppl. I hate to break it ot you but the Govt and the right never had a problem with that. |
OK, but don't you dare pretend that the left is innocent of the same bull. |
|
|
| zig |
| quote: | Originally posted by George Smiley
Ah but who created God? Maybe he evolved from some green slime somewhere in the universe? |
I thought God created God.....:tongue2 |
|
|
| Shakka |
| quote: | Originally posted by zig
I thought God created God.....:tongue2 |
I thought the fact that it was essentially an unanswerable question (i.e. something that must be accepted on faith alone) was one of the main drivers of the entire argument? |
|
|
| zig |
| quote: | Originally posted by Shakka
I thought the fact that it was essentially an unanswerable question (i.e. something that must be accepted on faith alone) was one of the main drivers of the entire argument? |
It is....but it pretty well sums it up how entrenched attitudes are. |
|
|
| ::TranceVanDyk:: |
in context with the christian god, he was not created, otherwise he would not be the ultimate reality.
| quote: | Revelation 1:8
“I am the Alpha and the Omega,” says the Lord God, “who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty.”
Revelation 21:6
He said to me: “It is done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End. To him who is thirsty I will give to drink without cost from the spring of the water of life.
Revelation 22:13
I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End. |
|
|
|
| igottaknow |
| god created god then god created evolution then evolution created man then man created god then evolution uncreated god then creationists recreated god |
|
|
| George Smiley |
| quote: | Originally posted by Shakka
I thought the fact that it was essentially an unanswerable question (i.e. something that must be accepted on faith alone) was one of the main drivers of the entire argument? |
How easy must it be to get a science degree from a religious uni?!
Basically, religion boils down to pure laziness...
When humans didn't understand things, they merely credited it to God (or gods) They couldn't be arsed to look into the real reasons. Then science came along, disproved everything in the Bible etc and that really should have been the end of it. But the lazy religious people sneaked thru into this 2005th century of our Lord Saviour, and still cant be arsed to find the real reasons why things happen even tho humans have proved it and its right there in front of their faces!!
People who teach creationism as fact are very dangerous to our society and I can only suggest taking up arms against them or they will continue to survive and spout their evil lies like they have been doing since the days of the enlightenment... |
|
|
| Shakka |
| quote: | Originally posted by George Smiley
People who teach creationism as fact are very dangerous to our society and I can only suggest taking up arms against them or they will continue to survive and spout their evil lies like they have been doing since the days of the enlightenment... |
I'm sorry, but this last statement is nothing more than the pot calling the kettle black. They are the "dangerous" ones, yet you are advocating taking up arms against them? Unless of course I am taking you too seriously. |
|
|
| occrider |
| quote: | Originally posted by Shakka
I'm sorry, but this last statement is nothing more than the pot calling the kettle black. They are the "dangerous" ones, yet you are advocating taking up arms against them? Unless of course I am taking you too seriously. |
Look! He's one of them!!! Let's get him!!!! :p |
|
|
| George Smiley |
| quote: | Originally posted by Shakka
I'm sorry, but this last statement is nothing more than the pot calling the kettle black. They are the "dangerous" ones, yet you are advocating taking up arms against them? Unless of course I am taking you too seriously. |
Possibly you could be taking me too seriously...
I dont really think we should take up arms against them altho they should probably be stripped of all political rights just to be on the safe side? |
|
|
| igottaknow |
| quote: | Originally posted by George Smiley
Possibly you could be taking me too seriously...
I dont really think we should take up arms against them altho they should probably be stripped of all political rights just to be on the safe side? |
Hey, I like that "taking up arms" idea. premptive strike if you will. bush gave me that idea ;) |
|
|
|
|
