|
Mixing in the Future! (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| A.DJ |
The software still needs an operator, the beatmatchin can be done either automatically or manually. The art will be in writing the perfect beatmatch algorythm(s) for the software. The entertainer is still the important link between the music and the ambience of the praty. Playing what the people want to hear, experimenting and making peple experience new developments in ones own made music.
One could experiement and make an art out of digital mixing.
I personally always refer to the example:
I cook.
Still it doesnt make me a chef eventhough I use the same tools.
The beauty of this software is that it is a tool which everyone will be able to use at their own level of experience. Meaning, if one does not have as much experience as a dj one can still sound like one, but not as good as an experienced dj with the same software. |
|
|
| Driguez |
| not a bad concept for lazy and wanna be dj's,god now anyone can be a dj,what takes ppl years to learn and master now my little brother can do in 7 min :wtf: ,and besides where's the fun of a software doing the beatmatching for you? might as well play a cd :whip: |
|
|
| LiamPaddock |
| Not much of a company judging by the site.:p |
|
|
| Mike123 |
| This auto dj thing can't read a crowd anyway, so the thing is useless. With that being said, it will never even be able to come close to what the experienced djs can do. |
|
|
| A.DJ |
| As I stated before. The software still eeds an operator to read the crowd. The medium of the DJ is changed, not the music. |
|
|
| Driguez |
| sorry man you are talking to the wrong people,promote it at a high school or something,i dont think any dj will agree with using that autodj thing |
|
|
| Mike123 |
Yeah, if you had any experiance in "REAL"** djing, you would not even try to push any such thing in here. Try pushing that thing somewhere else.
**Real-Beatmatching,reading crowds,tricks,eqing,interacting with the crowd,skills,scratching,timing,etc,etc,etc,etc,and so on and so forth! |
|
|
| Dervish |
Wait a sec so this doesn't mix (fade in and out) just beatmatches? I thought it did it all for some reason.
Ok now I get yea. But there are alot of products out already which can do that surely?
Not to mention you are kinda whoring it here with your 6 posts and all. |
|
|
| IntegraR0064 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Dervish
Wait a sec so this doesn't mix (fade in and out) just beatmatches? I thought it did it all for some reason.
Ok now I get yea. But there are alot of products out already which can do that surely?
Not to mention you are kinda whoring it here with your 6 posts and all. |
because...look at the site:
"DJ's can:
Play completely live and "hands on" or sit back and let AutoDJ take over some or even all of the mixing. ..." |
|
|
| IntegraR0064 |
| quote: | Originally posted by A.DJ
As I stated before. The software still eeds an operator to read the crowd. The medium of the DJ is changed, not the music. |
But it wouldn't end up that way...club owners won't see it that way. Especially when you market it like this (taken directly from your site):
"Club-owners can:
Play mixes automatically when there is no DJ around to perform the warm up or even the main set." |
|
|
| 3xx3r7 |
| This is nothing new. Beatmatching software existed for some time now. Now if this thing could EQ, phrase match, keymatch and fade-in/out by itself, then most of the DJ's would be screwed big time. The mixes have major EQ'ing and keymatching problems anyway. |
|
|
| IntegraR0064 |
| quote: | Originally posted by 3xx3r7
This is nothing new. Beatmatching software existed for some time now. Now if this thing could EQ, phrase match, keymatch and fade-in/out by itself, then most of the DJ's would be screwed big time. The mixes have major EQ'ing and keymatching problems anyway. |
Yeah but it was never accurate. I haven't actually listened to the mixes, so I have no idea how good they are. I guess I'm just talking about the theoretical, if it worked like he says it does and they're within 1/50000th of a second or something case. |
|
|
|
|
