|
Juno VS Discogs for tracklisting
|
View this Thread in Original format
| meneedit |
| good... so Juno had it wrong? |
|
|
| Aiwendil |
| the ordering of the tracks looks congruous, but the spelling on juno is not perfect. |
|
|
| TwoPlow |
| Juno is better than some places, but Discogs is pretty much the holy writ. |
|
|
| r5a |
| quote: | Originally posted by TwoPlow
Discogs is pretty much the holy writ. |
Agreed. BTW, that set looks pretty in tight. |
|
|
| meneedit |
| Nah, i'm talking about "Bunker - Decent" I cant find any record of the song on discogs, but, I can however find "Bullet In The Gun 2000" |
|
|
| flavdave |
| I don't think Bunker - Descent was ever given a proper release. |
|
|
| Armin |
| Juno for covers, DiscoGS for infos and tracklists ;) |
|
|
| GrimReaper |
| quote: | Originally posted by meneedit
Nah, i'm talking about "Bunker - Decent" I cant find any record of the song on discogs, but, I can however find "Bullet In The Gun 2000" |
If you were talking about that, why didn't you say it in the opening post then? Do you think people here can read your mind or something? :p
There are loads and loads more tracks on various compilations and mix CDs which never got properly released in full.
And yes, lots of record stores along with Juno, have occasional errors in tracklists and such but so does Discogs. We are only human so errors might occur. |
|
|
| meneedit |
| so what is it!? is it decent or bullet in the gun!? |
|
|
|
|
