|
Oh Terrorism attacks... (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| PIPER3112 |
| it was really terrible to see an attack in the metro of london :mad: |
|
|
| Marcus007 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lopitrance
England is such a powerful country, I hope they don't retaliate in some rash way and start more of a conflict...
|
rofl, this is EXACTLY the problem with terrorism, there is no one country to retaliate against. It's nothing more than a global syndicate with small forces set up in almost every country INCLUDING Montreal... |
|
|
| malek |
what do bush and blair have to do with these bombings!?!?
islamist radicals have been bombing up way before these two came to power. and it won't stop. |
|
|
| Lopitrance |
You're right it wont, and even if it does there will be others bombing for other reasons.
And Marcus you cant retaliate against one country you're right, but you can at the VERY LEAST bring those to justice who were responsible. |
|
|
| Marcus007 |
I found this caption to be a tad interesting. I wonder if Iraq said that when bombs first started going off... |
|
|
| malek |
| quote: | Originally posted by Marcus007
I wonder if Iraq said that when bombs first started going off... |
of course. |
|
|
| Marcus007 |
| I checked out your Syria pics today, Malek. Incredible stuff, man. :o |
|
|
| gd_nimrod |
| quote: | Originally posted by Bronze
Voilà des raisons pour continuer la guerre au terrorisme |
I cant believe im reading this, coming from a smart Canadian.
The war is a war on TERROR. Terror = noun. Every time the US has tried to fight a war on a noun (drugs, poverty) they have FAILED. Just as they will with this, you cannot fight a war on a noun, simple as that.
When you see hundreds and hundreds of dead Iraqis...noone says anythiing, cause they are in the less civilized part of the world. And dont tell its only a few dying cause every day there are attacks we dont hear about.
I am however, sorry that innocents had to die in England.
BTW, political threads on a forum? Big no-no. There are always ppl like Bronze who are misinformed and will turn the discussion into a flame. |
|
|
| fastmp3 |
you guys said it all, i won't add a word.
i'm sorry for all innocents dying (wether they are british, iraqis, afghan, africans, etc ...).
ZinG : nice coordination, you better come back before they catch your ass |
|
|
| morsy |
| quote: | Originally posted by Bronze
Cé pas de Nick qu'on a besoin
Mais de plus de bombes pour anéantir les forces terrorismes
Sfini les bombes dans les grandes villes du monde
c'est tellement terrible... |
on dit forces terroristes MEC
et Ben laden et le reste des terroristes c'est le meilleur ami a ton president favoris Big bush car il lui ouvre les portes pour agir comme un imbecile |
|
|
| Marcus007 |
| quote: | Originally posted by fastmp3
ZinG : nice coordination, you better come back before they catch your ass |
rgr, he was a sneaky mother****** wasn't he? |
|
|
| zoogla |
| quote: | Originally posted by gd_nimrod
I cant believe im reading this, coming from a smart Canadian.
The war is a war on TERROR. Terror = noun. Every time the US has tried to fight a war on a noun (drugs, poverty) they have FAILED. Just as they will with this, you cannot fight a war on a noun, simple as that.
When you see hundreds and hundreds of dead Iraqis...noone says anythiing, cause they are in the less civilized part of the world. And dont tell its only a few dying cause every day there are attacks we dont hear about.
I am however, sorry that innocents had to die in England.
BTW, political threads on a forum? Big no-no. There are always ppl like Bronze who are misinformed and will turn the discussion into a flame. |
Wow, very well said...sounds like something Epi would say with his obsession with grammar LOL :p
Political threads, prostitution threads, mother****** threads, anything goes, man, but Bronze isn't half the flamestarter Shadowolf is...(hint, hint)
Anyway, I have to re-emphasize how much I agree with your point!!! War on a noun when you say it like that doesn't even make SENSE!!!! LOL!!!
Malek, it was Bush, not his predecessors, that decided that the root to the terrorism that hit NYC was planted in Afghanistan. Occupying other countries and nation-building isn't the answer unless you kill off every single person that would hold a grudge.
What ticks me off so much more is the preferential treatment that Saudis were given right after 9/11 (yes I believe every word that Michael Moore tells me) that shows how BUSH prefers one Arab country over the other, ESPECIALLY when (I can't prove this, but the secretive way in which the Saudi government works--I witnessed this--makes me paranoid) probably the planning and money comes from Saudi Arabia. Case in point: Osama Bin Laden.
I very much hold Bush's cavalier attitude to such a sensitive and complex issue partially responsible for this.
What happened to the days of fostering TRUE PEACE (Clinton with Rabin and Arafat?) |
|
|
|
|
