|
Oh Terrorism attacks... (pg. 5)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| DJDan-B |
| USA needs oil. I c it this way; if there is no oil, US reserves will go low in about 40 years or so (you may correct me on this one) and what then? How can u start a war, you get "attacked" and convince everyone to "fight back" You feel it? 3000 people... it's not that big as a number if you think about it (when it comes to scales of war). |
|
|
| Lopitrance |
Ya but unfourtunately, the United States for example does not START wars by attacking civilians... Of course there are casualities DURING war which is awful and its sad they arent remembered like the people of sept 11 are or the ones from the recent tragedy in London.
The United States does not fight it's wars by SPECIFICALLY going after average joes on their way to work... Or sitting at their desks already at work. |
|
|
| gd_nimrod |
| quote: | Originally posted by malek
what hard evidence do you want?? even if you do get, you won't believe it.
|
Though i respect your posts, i really do, i have to call you a newbie.
Heres the evidence we want:
1. Why is there NO footage of the plane that crashed into the Pentagon? There are 4 video stills rlsed which show NOTHING that resembles an airplane, merely a rocket (which it very well could have been). And dont say theres no footage available, because around the highway and the depanneurs (or, convenience stores) around the pentagon CBC did an investigation which showed there actually WAS footage of the whole plane crash....BUT the FBi came within minutes to the places to remove the vides.
2. WTC Tower #7. How/why did it collapse? The Fifth Estate once again showed that not only the actual TOWERS shouldnt have collapsed from the fire because the steel could withstand the heat, but for the buildings NEXT to the WTC to collapse...thats a mystery.
3. How about revealing that censored parts of the infamous 911 report? Over 30 pages out of a 100 (?) were censored for some reason...noone knows! But it clearly has something to do with the TRUTH.
4. Bin Ladin's family getting a ing ticket out of the us. Imagine Timothy Mcveighs relatives getting a ticket out from the us to the .eu right after having bombed the buildings. Would the us citizens stand for that? NO! Why did they now??
Note that i dont care about how the us resolves their many many problems, its just fun to analyze this. |
|
|
| Marcus007 |
| quote: | Originally posted by gd_nimrod
Though i respect your posts, i really do, i have to call you a newbie.
Heres the evidence we want:
1. Why is there NO footage of the plane that crashed into the Pentagon? There are 4 video stills rlsed which show NOTHING that resembles an airplane, merely a rocket (which it very well could have been). And dont say theres no footage available, because around the highway and the depanneurs (or, convenience stores) around the pentagon CBC did an investigation which showed there actually WAS footage of the whole plane crash....BUT the FBi came within minutes to the places to remove the vides.
2. WTC Tower #7. How/why did it collapse? The Fifth Estate once again showed that not only the actual TOWERS shouldnt have collapsed from the fire because the steel could withstand the heat, but for the buildings NEXT to the WTC to collapse...thats a mystery.
3. How about revealing that censored parts of the infamous 911 report? Over 30 pages out of a 100 (?) were censored for some reason...noone knows! But it clearly has something to do with the TRUTH.
4. Bin Ladin's family getting a ing ticket out of the us. Imagine Timothy Mcveighs relatives getting a ticket out from the us to the .eu right after having bombed the buildings. Would the us citizens stand for that? NO! Why did they now??
Note that i dont care about how the us resolves their many many problems, its just fun to analyze this. |
Someone saw IN PLANE SIGHT... ;) |
|
|
| zoogla |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lopitrance
Actually they did claim responsibility given Osama said himself "The towers falling down was a bonus for us". |
That's exactly what I was referring to. "bonus for us" doesn't even come CLOSE to IMPLYING responsibility. "BONUS" means it was EXTRA; something that they didn't have to do; it was GIVEN to them (from someone else)...anyway, that's my and Layloula's interpretation! ;)
| quote: | Originally posted by malek
what hard evidence do you want?? even if you do get, you won't believe it. |
Wallah if given worthy evidence, I would believe it. Not the kind of evidence that proved there were WMDs in Iraq, of course, that Bush and Blair tried to pawn off to the world...anything better than that (also better than the evidence of finding a passport belonging to one of the plane hijackers buried under the rubble--I question that too)...
| quote: | Originally posted by malek
its like people saying I need to see god to believe in him. and if you do see him, you will think its a hoax. |
It's nothing like that because I have no faith in al-Qaeda whatsoever. I would love to blame them; it's just I need something to do so. Something that a literate, rational person needs, of course (i.e. not Bush) :p
| quote: | Originally posted by malek
(ps: i'm god) |
That may be true, still, ALLAH PWNS YOU...:p |
|
|
| gd_nimrod |
| quote: | Originally posted by Marcus007
Someone saw IN PLANE SIGHT... ;) |
LMAO. Hehehe.
I think more ppl should as well:) |
|
|
| gd_nimrod |
| quote: | Originally posted by slippy
poor |
wrong forum? |
|
|
| Falcon-X |
| quote: | Originally posted by fayraree
It's nothing like that because I have no faith in al-Qaeda whatsoever. I would love to blame them; it's just I need something to do so. Something that a literate, rational person needs, of course (i.e. not Bush) :p
That may be true, still, ALLAH PWNS YOU...:p |
Yet you have even less proof that it was the US themselves but you blame them :rolleyes: |
|
|
| Marcus007 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Falcon-X
Yet you have even less proof that it was the US themselves but you blame them :rolleyes: |
So them claiming the attacks their own repeatedly isn't enough proof for you? :o :P |
|
|
| Falcon-X |
| quote: | Originally posted by Marcus007
So them claiming the attacks their own repeatedly isn't enough proof for you? :o :P |
What???? the US claimed responsability???? lol reread my post and the whole thread for that matter :p |
|
|
| Marcus007 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Falcon-X
What???? the US claimed responsability???? lol reread my post and the whole thread for that matter :p |
No, no, I meant AlQaeda:
| quote: | | It's nothing like that because I have no faith in al-Qaeda whatsoever. I would love to blame them; it's just I need something to do so |
(edit: ahh I see now what went wrong. I meant to quote Fayree's post, not yours. My bad. :P) |
|
|
|
|
