return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > DJing / Production / Promotion > Music Producers Promotion

Pages: [1] 2 
[ProgTrance] Glynka feat. Alexander Kostruba - Anyway (Alexander Kostruba remix) FULL
View this Thread in Original format
NTT1
SUBJ

Hi, guys, I have a new stuff exclusive for you from me. Sorry, for my bad English and that I can't help you with some replies (bad internet :( ). I think you understand me and I want you to help me with some replies here... :)

So download it while it still there )

DOWNLOAD
(192 kpbs MP3 44100 Hz 9:53)


Thanks in advance!
Aquarian
I haven't heard the original, so I can't really take that into consideration.

Percussions were awsome. Usually the intro is the boring bit, but this one was made particularly interresting from those organic/fluid sounding synths. Very nice work on that.

(P.S., are those accoustic drums I hear in the breakdown at around 4:45?)

The vocals, I don't like so much. From my first impression, they seemed burried beneath everything else, and when they first come in they sound a bit out of place. After a bit, they seem to take their place a little more, but I still wish I could hear them better.
NTT1
Thanks, Aquarian. I don't want you to hear the original :haha:

Guys, I need your reviews here, sorry that I can't help you with my reviews..

Come on! ;)
eulerfx
- nice percs and really nice use of fx
- that vocals comes in way too suddenly. do some more background vocal fx buildup before the come in, and maybe have them come in during a break down
- the strings and pads in the break around 2:30 ought to be fuller and louder
- after that 1st break, those breaks souns pretty nice, but you need some more bottom end at places
- there should be more melodic elements in the mid frequency range, without it the track seems a bit empty
- the vocals could sound nice if they were as muted. make them more clear, add a touch of processing, and maybe some simple edits
- overall, this song has potential. very energetic and strong percs, but the mid frequencies should be cleaned up, made louder and then you shoud add more melodic elements, or pads or something to fill that gap
TRANcL8R
Hi!
i second what eulerfx said,and there's so much (drums,perc) going on try to remove some and make it cleaner/smoother (I.M.O.),the volume is un-even around 3.57 maybe when the bass came in ...
Cheers!
NTT1
To eulerfx - thanks a lot!
To TRANcL8R - thanks, but i don't know what about volume..
I'll fix mid frequences and vocal details.

More replies )) Please )
NTT1
Ohh thanks a lot, man! If I knew English better, I could say more. Don't want to make a mistakes )) Don't wanna make a mess )

What did you say about Marco and Benjamin? If you can give me some links or something... ;)

And certainly more reviews are very welcome ;)
NTT1
So I made some changes in details and I have a new verion of that track.

DOWNLOAD

And I'd like to see some feedback here, guys ;)

Thanks in advance!
Liquid8
Very nice! Especially the percussions! Didn't like the bass as well as the chord progression. Didn't like the vocals too. :rolleyes:
The best point here is definitly the percs.
NTT1
=Liquid8=
thanks, man..

And what do you think about sending that track on some labels? Is it ready for it? Asking because one guy on a another forum said that it sounds too acute. And I don't see some similar opinions here and from my friends.. So what do you think: is it wrong or not about acute? Or some new advices from you about mastering? Anyway thanks to you all! ;)

Liquid8
I'm not sure about sending a REMIX to some labels :rolleyes: Maybe you'll figure out and make an original track from this one ? Dunno what to say. Anyway you can always try to send it. The worst thing you can expect is a negatve answer from them, nothing more ;)
NTT1
Oops, I've made a mistake..
This track isn't a REmix, it's a MIX, because only voice was taken from the original. So I'm think I should try to send this mix to some djs at least, am I right?
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: [1] 2 
Privacy Statement