|
America, UK, france military vs the rest of the world, who will win? (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Aiwendil |
| quote: | Originally posted by XRVOL
China 1.2 billion people
India 1 billion people
with the right transportation they will destroy all before them. |
Yeah they're going to have to order up a lot of these babies:
Together they have like four ships made out of metal, all at least 20 years old. I think they finally got the plans to commission a modern tri-plane air force. |
|
|
| XRVOL |
Dont forget theyre in an alliance with the rest of the world. their old enemy japan will supply them.
anyways china already has a decent army and now with the EU lifting an arms embargo and china's economy growing rapidly they will become a huge power very soon. |
|
|
| Aiwendil |
| France and the UK would be overrun quickly. After that the US would fall soon enough as it would be attacked from all sides: Canda/Mexico/Pacific Ocean/Atlantic Ocean. |
|
|
| XoxidE |
I would think that the US would lose their control of the country and poeple would create chaos and violence and we would end up destroying ourselves...
thats what I would do lol |
|
|
| XRVOL |
my arse:) |
|
|
| XoxidE |
| lol...not to make fun...but the eagle is crying :wtf: |
|
|
| Tranceplant |
| The US, UK and France would win by nuking their closest non nuclear neighbors right away so that would only leave nuclear enemies Russia, Pakistan, India, China and Israel left. Countries with nukes would NOT nuke each other. US, UK and France technology and well trained military would win against the world. |
|
|
| Michael19 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Tranceplant
The US, UK and France would win by nuking their closest non nuclear neighbors right away so that would only leave nuclear enemies Russia, Pakistan, India, China and Israel left. Countries with nukes would NOT nuke each other. US, UK and France technology and well trained military would win against the world. |
brilliant. |
|
|
| CleverName |
| quote: | Originally posted by XRVOL
Russia never surrendered and they kicked the nazi's ass in Stalingrad. They practically won the war for the allies. |
Yeah, and they lost 1.5 million men, women, and children in the process. I wouldn't quite call that "victory" per se. |
|
|
| gouuryella |
| France would never be allies with the U.S and U.K, because they follow different politics, but if this ever would happend (which is even stupid to discuss) i think the rest of the world would win because the rest of the world has more people which means more soliders, if you add all the weapons together, they would equal more then the 3 allies have. But if you put U.S vs any other country in the world, i think U.S would be because of the advance millitary that they have. I would rank England number 2 in Millitary. |
|
|
| Aiwendil |
Superior technology is nothing against numbers. For every man we'd have, they'd have 10 or more? 20?.
The key for the world is to take each of the three countries one at a time. France first, then the UK, then the US. Overwhelm France, overwhelm the UK, then crush the US.
Now the first thing Canada would do is capture all oil fields in Alaska. No oil from Alaska and no oil from overseas would severely cripple the US economy. This coupled with wave after wave after wave of attacks from the seemingly limitless supply of enemy troops over the Pacific and over land, constantly whittling away at our limited troops, would have a severe impact on the civilian population. Revolution maybe? Who knows. Again, France falls easily: Just send a million Chinese across the border. When continental Europe falls and the US is occupied with Japan/Canada/Mexico/Australia not to mention dealing with the unrest of its population, the UK is on its own against Asia, Australia, Africa, and Continental Europe. Armada after armada come across the Channel. The UK falls easily. And after that, as I said before, down goes the USA when it is bombarded on all sides by land, sea, and air with innumerable amounts of enemy. Because after (or maybe before) France falls India and China simply split up their forces, one half sent to the UK and one half shipped en masse to Mexico and Canada to attack the US by land.
And in all this Australia sits back and is used whenever it is needed in any part of the world's battle that might get a little sticky. I'd assume their main goal would be to fortify Canadian-held positions in Alaska, and send assistance in fighting Britain and distracting the US when needed. They'd help ship Chinese/Indian soldiers to Canada/Mexico and so on. |
|
|
|
|
