|
Disconnected with Trance Music lately (pg. 7)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| basd |
| quote: | Originally posted by djmetatron
I have yet to hear of one reason why trance isn't supposed to be superficial. |
Can't you read?
It has been said already that the type of music should put you IN A TRANCE.
Superficial music just does not do that. |
|
|
| SYSTEM-J |
| quote: | Originally posted by djmetatron
obviously I'm talking to the people who are bitching about trace and how it's in some 'crisis'. |
And you're lumping them all in with the same complaint?
I have no problem with epic or anthem trance provided it's creative and interesting. The bland soft-synth stuff you get today is neither. Producers simply don't want to mess around with the formula anymore, and the result is stagnation. Argue with that all you like, but it won't go away. |
|
|
| djmetatron |
| quote: | Originally posted by basd
Can't you read?
It has been said already that the type of music should put you IN A TRANCE.
Superficial music just does not do that. |
Wow, your meaning of the word superficial must be different than mine. Superficial music can VERY MUCH put you ‘into a trance'. You don't have to think too much tdo be in a trance, you just hear the rhythm and the sound and become entranced, not much below the surface. That is what I mean. If you have a different view point then please do share.
The sounds themselves can be very complicated (high amount of layers/channels) and the quality of the recording can be top notch; but if it's successful trance (or any EDM tune really), it's still superficial and two dimensional. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just mean that you must accept this fact and weigh your criticisms accordingly. |
|
|
| djmetatron |
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
And you're lumping them all in with the same complaint?
I have no problem with epic or anthem trance provided it's creative and interesting. The bland soft- around with the formula anymore, and the result is stagnation. Argue with synth stuff you get today is neither. Producers simply don't want to messthat all you like, but it won't go away. |
Well you are right that there is a small amount of producers that have not improved apon any formula and are producing tracks with only a success-rate in mind. I can think of a few, but this to me is not as hate-inspiring as it may be to you.
And I think we differ on one clear view-point. This section of trance producers to me is hardly worth noticing or thinking about (e.g. it's small); whereas you thiink it is the deadly leech that is sucking away at the soul of trance and is its ultmate demise. Which do you think is more delusional? |
|
|
| SYSTEM-J |
| quote: | Originally posted by djmetatron
Wow, your meaning of the word superficial must be different than mine. Superficial music can VERY MUCH put you ‘into a trance'. You don't have to think too much tdo be in a trance, you just hear the rhythm and the sound and become entranced, not much below the surface. That is what I mean. If you have a different view point then please do share.
The sounds themselves can be very complicated (high amount of layers/channels) and the quality of the recording can be top notch; but if it's successful trance (or any EDM tune really), it's still superficial and two dimensional. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just mean that you must accept this fact and weigh your criticisms accordingly. |
I have to disagree. As in totally. I think you don't listen to the right trance. Good trance can have things going on that you detect unconsciously, and only really pick up on a noticable level when you cut some of the frequency away.
Oh, and you can believe that there is still innovative, original trance being made if you want. |
|
|
| arwoo |
1998/99
The golden years for me. Nothing will ever be like that again. So many tracks coming out of amazing quality that still sound amazing.
trance after 2003 seems to not have the same spirit or energy or something is missing. I cant put my finger on it.
alternate - alternate mr raw remix
Is about the only thing from 03 that i would say had the spirit and energy im talking about. |
|
|
| basd |
| quote: | Originally posted by djmetatron
Wow, your meaning of the word superficial must be different than mine. Superficial music can VERY MUCH put you ‘into a trance'. You don't have to think too much tdo be in a trance, you just hear the rhythm and the sound and become entranced, not much below the surface. That is what I mean. If you have a different view point then please do share. |
The only 'trance' that most of the music I regard as superficial puts me in, is sleep. To me, proper trance consists of layers and layers of subtleties, slowly progressing music that keeps your attention and makes you forget about time.
Superficial trance, on the other hand, reminds me about time every other minute or so because of some stupid crash-breakdown-buildup structure. Also, to me, vocals are a key indicator of superficial trance. Really, they're useless in this genre. |
|
|
| djmetatron |
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
I have to disagree. As in totally. I think you don't listen to the right trance. Good trance can have things going on that you detect unconsciously, and only really pick up on a noticable level when you cut some of the frequency away. |
Yes but 'unconcious' or rather subconsious messages that you can recieve are to me categorized under the superficial type. They are created by the producer as sounds that are supposed to be heard but on a differen't level than the consious level. What I mean is actual sceptisism and consious thought being required for most EDM is pretty much non-existent.
Example: Listening to an Elliot Smith album and 'consciously' empathising with his lyrics and 'consciously' processing his particular situation (he tried commiting suicide severel times and 2 years ago succeeded). This kind of thinking is hardly present in most EDM, especially trance.
It's an extreme case but I hope you are getting my point; EDM does not require you to be consiously present to enjoy or be 'entranced by' it's sounds.
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
Oh, and you can believe that there is still innovative, original trance being made if you want. |
Yep I do, and if you don't maybe you should check out:
Kosmas Epsilon
Mannel
Hydroid
Mike Foyle
Benz & MD
Delikate Imposters
Niklas Harding
Pig & Dan
Ava Mea
James Holden
Nathan Fake
If none of these guys do it for you, I don't know what will.:rolleyes: |
|
|
| SYSTEM-J |
| Jesus Christ. So, of all things, you consider lyrics not to be superficial? And that subtle, deep-set elements in track are superficial? I think you need to get the dictionary out on what the word means. |
|
|
| Psy-T |
| quote: | Originally posted by djmetatron
It's unbelievable how pretenious and just plain picky you all are. Just enjoy the music for what it is! Appreciate what Andy Moor and Adam White are trying to do with the sound. The root of my love for electronic stems from the love of the use of tecnology to express feelings and experiences.
I have yet to hear of one reason why trance isn't supposed to be superficial. You just say.. "wrong." or "he's right though". But nothing to actually support your opinion.
Maybe I should make one caveat clear. I don't persoanlly think that the superficiality of the genre is a good thing; but what I'm saying is that getting agry over the superficiality of trance is like hating for smelling bad. You can do it all you want but it's still gonna stink.
So your tastes have become more refined/picky. Good for you, whoopidy doo dah! Doesn't change the fact that you used to love what you now hate. ;) |
without reading the posts following your's (i'll get to em after posting this), the evidence for how trance wasn't superficial in the begining exists, that's why no one is bothering to give you 'reason' and instead just say "he's right though", it exists in the form of music, (nearly) all trance music 'trance' music that was released in the early nineties.
and even though my tastes have gotten more refined, i dont hate something i used to love.
both because i never loved what you're thinking about to begin with
and because i dont hate any genre of music. |
|
|
| Psy-T |
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
Jesus Christ. So, of all things, you consider lyrics not to be superficial? And that subtle, deep-set elements in track are superficial? I think you need to get the dictionary out on what the word means. |
exactly.
based on metatron's last post i can see his definition is the complete opposite of superficiality. |
|
|
| djmetatron |
bah, whatever.. agree to disagree.
I think I am using the word 'superficial' in a differen't way than you though.
Of course there are many productions in EDM that can hardly be considered simply 'superficial'. What I am saying is that the roots of EDM are about the immediate sound. I hate to put down your precious music as being 'superficial' but I'm not being negative at all when I am saying this. I simply mean that EDM is meant to be heard and not thought about is all. |
|
|
|
|
