|
Vinyl Purists Go To Hell (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Thriller |
| quote: | Originally posted by jethro
/cell phone/etc. |
How much could you charge for that lol? |
|
|
| jethro |
| quote: | Originally posted by Thriller
How much could you charge for that lol? |
if you have the skills to make use of it whatever is the standard rate.
anyone here besides me old enough to remember kraftwerk using pocket calculators in their live performances back in the day? |
|
|
| Junior Chavez |
| quote: | Originally posted by dj_bas
guess it doesn't matter either way, but ALL cds could get just a little un-fun |
i agree vinyl is simply way more fun. nothing wrong with digital, but vinyl is king in my book :happy2: |
|
|
| St. Michael |
| Did anyone notice that Audiojelly has started to charge £2.40 for 320kbps tracks? That's $4.33 per track. Digital compressed files are starting to catch up to vinyl pricing. |
|
|
| dj_bas |
| quote: | Originally posted by St. Michael
Did anyone notice that Audiojelly has started to charge £2.40 for 320kbps tracks? That's $4.33 per track. Digital compressed files are starting to catch up to vinyl pricing. |
they sell different compression rates for different prices? why wouldn't someone just get the lowest one and recompress? |
|
|
| Junior Chavez |
| quote: | Originally posted by dj_bas
they sell different compression rates for different prices? why wouldn't someone just get the lowest one and recompress? |
lol you're lame. the lowest bit rate tracks ARE MISSING DATA... you don't understand compression very much do you? :thepirate |
|
|
| St. Michael |
| Once the file is compressed, the quality is degraded/compromised forever. |
|
|
| Junior Chavez |
| quote: | Originally posted by St. Michael
Once the file is compressed, the quality is degraded/compromised forever. |
precisely. |
|
|
| dj_bas |
| quote: | Originally posted by Junior Chavez
lol you're lame. the lowest bit rate tracks ARE MISSING DATA... you don't understand compression very much do you? :thepirate |
oh, i used the wrong words then
lets say you buy the 192 kbps version, you can always convert to a higher compression. then the computer magically finds this missing data which is actually stored in a meta file that comes with the mp3
trust me i'm a doctor |
|
|
| DJ Shibby |
| quote: | Originally posted by St. Michael
Did anyone notice that Audiojelly has started to charge £2.40 for 320kbps tracks? That's $4.33 per track. Digital compressed files are starting to catch up to vinyl pricing. |
No problem, let them get greedy and destroy their market just like the RIAA did.
What a shame.. |
|
|
| Junior Chavez |
| quote: | Originally posted by dj_bas
oh, i used the wrong words then
lets say you buy the 192 kbps version, you can always convert to a higher compression. then the computer magically finds this missing data which is actually stored in a meta file that comes with the mp3
trust me i'm a doctor |
lol yeah you can get a 192kbps and recompress to a 392kpbs... but it just magnified the ty sound cuz it already had data missing....
so you could in theory DO THAT. but it still sounds like a crappy 192.... cuz the same data is present. |
|
|
| Orbital32 |
| I love my technics. I also love my CDJ :) |
|
|
|
|
