|
The dogs bollocks? Not anymore...
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Tech0rz |
My mum took our dog Sam for his claws clipped and came back having booked an appointment to have the poor creatures bollcocks chopped off.
I'm no expert but it certainly doesn't sound fair to me. Do vets just love chopping off defensless animals love-spuds or is there a real reason to go to such extremes? It's costing £85 and I said I don't think it's politically correct or fair to have it done, but obviously theres some medical reason that justifies it (if that's possible).
I know that it calms the animal down, but he's not really that wild anyway. He's about 6 years old, middle-aged?
So is this really neccessary? :nervous:
|
|
|
| Vivid Boy |
| quote: | Originally posted by Tech0rz
My mum took our dog Sam for his claws clipped and came back having booked an appointment to have the poor creatures bollcocks chopped off.
I'm no expert but it certainly doesn't sound fair to me. Do vets just love chopping off defensless animals love-spuds or is there a real reason to go to such extremes? It's costing £85 and I said I don't think it's politically correct or fair to have it done, but obviously theres some medical reason that justifies it (if that's possible).
I know that it calms the animal down, but he's not really that wild anyway. He's about 6 years old, middle-aged?
So is this really neccessary? :nervous:
|
i suggest u get in as much dog loving as u can before the operation.
get the skippy peanut butter now! |
|
|
| paranoik0 |
| hey, what about glueing them back after the operation? |
|
|
| dinoXpress |
| it will make your dog more docile.. :) less tempermental as well. |
|
|
| Boomer187 |
| and will will decrease the chances of it either having pups or spreading pups everywhere. |
|
|
| Vivid Boy |
| quote: | Originally posted by Boomer187
and will will decrease the chances of it either having pups or spreading pups everywhere. |
and reduce the risk of u suckin his weiner |
|
|
| ::TranceVanDyk:: |
| quote: | Originally posted by Tech0rz
My mum took our dog Sam for his claws clipped and came back having booked an appointment to have the poor creatures bollcocks chopped off.
I'm no expert but it certainly doesn't sound fair to me. Do vets just love chopping off defensless animals love-spuds or is there a real reason to go to such extremes? It's costing £85 and I said I don't think it's politically correct or fair to have it done, but obviously theres some medical reason that justifies it (if that's possible).
I know that it calms the animal down, but he's not really that wild anyway. He's about 6 years old, middle-aged?
So is this really neccessary? :nervous:
|
lets see. dogs who have their bollocks mate. unless your planning on having a litter of puppies, they shouldnt be breeding. and the way to prevent that is through nuetering the animal, which after the inital recovery period, they are perfectly fine. they actually are less inclined to spray their territory and are less aggresive.
nobody needs a stray dog problem like many cities have. and they just breed like rats. |
|
|
| Boomer187 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Vivid Boy
and reduce the risk of u suckin his weiner |
actually no it doesn't. |
|
|
| Tiger777 |
Really necessary no, but it'll reduce the chances of very agressive cancers, especially for older dogs, this is a pretty good reason to have it done. A dog isn't a human being, he doesn't care about his balls being chopped off or not. My adivce: chop'em!
85£ is the normal price to have it done. |
|
|
| Tech0rz |
I wouldn't get them reattached, but apperently you can have fake ones put back in. I wonder if they'll notice? I'm guessing the amount of time they spend licking and staring at them, they're bound to know someone replaced them with 2 of those capsules you find inside Kinder Eggs.
My dog isn't tempermental or doesn't need calming down though, and although he will shag anything with a pulse, he never gets chance these days. So there's no worries about him spreading his seed.
Why would him having no balls put be off sucking his weiner? He probably wouldn't enjoy it as much anyway so there's probably no point, seeing as I would get nothing from it.
|
|
|
| Tech0rz |
| quote: | Originally posted by Tiger777
Really necessary no, but it'll reduce the chances of very agressive cancers, especially for older dogs, this is a pretty good reason to have it done. A dog isn't a human being, he doesn't care about his balls being chopped off or not. My adivce: chop'em!
85£ is the normal price to have it done. |
You're not a vet are you? :nervous:
|
|
|
| Tiger777 |
Almost a vet ;)
| quote: | Originally posted by Tech0rz
My dog isn't tempermental or doesn't need calming down though, and although he will shag anything with a pulse, he never gets chance these days. So there's no worries about him spreading his seed.
Why would him having no balls put be off sucking his weiner? He probably wouldn't enjoy it as much anyway so there's probably no point, seeing as I would get nothing from it.
|
This is like with humans, if I chop your balls off, you'll stay masculin cuz you're brain is 'programmed' by testosterone when you were young to think as a male. He'll still be able to get orgasms, and therefor he'll still be licking his weiner...
They might lose the ability to smell horny lady-dogs, and that will decrease the risk of them running away from home in the search for females (and getting hit by a truck or being shot by your neighbour).
Reattaching balls? Never heard anything about that :p |
|
|
|
|
