|
the terror threat (pg. 7)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| DaveBegic |
| Thanks for the info Alex, Trance nutter for the wicked pic, and scott bateman for lookin the goodz. |
|
|
| eROs.au |
Come to Dandenong if you want terrorist, as a matter of fact come check out the south eastern suburbs its full of them around here.
lol.
all jokes aside. the only reason they are doing these raids is only to scare people so the anti terror laws pass.
imo i dont think there ever would be a attack in australia.
and even if they do attack us, with our CS skills we all know we would own them. |
|
|
| alex_cooke |
| quote: | Originally posted by eROs.au
Come to Dandenong if you want terrorist, as a matter of fact come check out the south eastern suburbs its full of them around here. |
Guess where I'm moving to soon??? Well, not Dandenong but close enough. I'm pretty sure it would be classified as Sth Eastern Suburbs...
AC -x0x- |
|
|
| narcism |
andrew bolt had a good article in the paper yesterday he raised some real valid points relating to what this could turn into.
- Two weeks of riots in france where cars and schools have been torched. Sources say they are protesting in relation to living in "ghetto" style living and are jobless.
Unemployment rate among muslims is at least twice that of other frenchmen.
- In denmark, youths have rampaged Aarhus after a danish paper printed cartoons mocking the prophet.
- In Holland mourners have marked the first anniversary of the murder of dutch director theo van gogh, who was almost decapitated by a muslim extremist for making a film mocking islam.
- Here in australia lebanese muslims are also twice as likely to be unemployed and in jail.
He also goes on to name some sheik's views on things (only highlights the extreme views) but still these people are so called leaders of the muslim people.
One said "goes on to call suicide bombers heroes, and the attack on sep 11 as gods work against the oppressors"
One has to think if these people are oppressed, jobless, poor... the possibility of them turning to violence would be quite high.
Allah will love them long time if they blow themselves up, but not if they are on the dole. |
|
|
| Trance Nutter |
| quote: | Originally posted by eROs.au
imo i dont think there ever would be a attack in australia.
|
nothing quite like denial is there?
Its happened before and it sure as hell will happen again. |
|
|
| Trance Nutter |
Can someone please bomb MissyM's caps lock key?
kthxbye |
|
|
| charlee |
| quote: | Originally posted by Trance Nutter
Can someone please bomb MissyM's caps lock key?
kthxbye |
Is that the new terror threat? |
|
|
| MiSSyM |
ahhahaha
Trance Nutter you're funny.
You use kthxbye?
well lets agree then I wont use CAPS and you dont use kthnxbye coz I think kthnxbye should plzdie.
Back to the topic,
Check out the Herald Sun website, there are picture profiles of some of the accused. One is only 20 years old........tsk tsk tsk.
:wtf: |
|
|
| Antistatic |
| quote: | Originally posted by MiSSyM
I think kthnxbye should plzdie.
|
LOL!
| quote: | Originally posted by Trance Nutter
nothing quite like denial is there?
Its happened before and it sure as hell will happen again.
|
+1 |
|
|
| Trance Nutter |
| quote: | Originally posted by MiSSyM
Trance Nutter you're funny.
|
I know
| quote: | Originally posted by MiSSyM
You use kthxbye?
|
nope, first time I've ever used it. |
|
|
| DIDI |
Another view http://media.theage.com.au/?categor...53&flash=0&ie=0
22. The Media v the Mob: who did what, when, first?
Monash University law graduate Mezwyn D'Junus writes:
The Herald Sun is today still banging on about their precious cameramen. Over at Spencer St, The Age has put footage of Tuesday's clash outside Melbourne Magistrates Court up on its website, so we can glean an insight into the press gang's modus operandi. Check it out in slow motion and replay a few times, and you will find an interesting point the media has so far ignored in its hysterical coverage – one of the cameramen hits one of the Muslim boys, an old trick so he can capture that moment of anger. And, of course, one thing leads to another.
Take a close look at the bald cameraman with the light blue shirt. If I'm not mistaken, when a woman begins yelling ahead in front of the boys, the Muslim boy in the beige hooded top wearing a black cap starts walking fast towards the commotion.
Now check out the cameraman who follows him from behind – he “taps” or “hits” the boy on the head or shoulders to get his attention to turn around so he can capture the boy's picture in anger. Of course, this works a treat, as the boy probably feels he's being attacked from behind. He falls for it, adding in turn to the fight. Also, note the fact that the boys yell at the paparazzi to “STAY AWAY!" Why would you yell “stay away” unless you feel you are being attacked?
It's a pity the scene starts too early to show how the media horde assists in instigating the fight. It's reminiscent of how the paparazzi would annoy their prey (insert name of movie star here) to provoke some reaction from them, to get the "money shot."
The media is not as innocent as they would like to portray themselves. They've successfully created a picture of young Muslim boys being violent in public, when the truth is the media instigated or at least helped create the havoc.
I don't condone any violence, but just listen to that cameraman at the end of the brawl before the boys walk away – he swears and yells: “You have no idea guys.”
What? Like no idea that the pictures he took would have set the boys up to look like terrorists from the Middle East?
Back to Top |
|
|
| Paulie |
| quote: | Originally posted by DIDI
Another view http://media.theage.com.au/?categor...53&flash=0&ie=0
22. The Media v the Mob: who did what, when, first?
Monash University law graduate Mezwyn D'Junus writes:
The Herald Sun is today still banging on about their precious cameramen. Over at Spencer St, The Age has put footage of Tuesday's clash outside Melbourne Magistrates Court up on its website, so we can glean an insight into the press gang's modus operandi. Check it out in slow motion and replay a few times, and you will find an interesting point the media has so far ignored in its hysterical coverage – one of the cameramen hits one of the Muslim boys, an old trick so he can capture that moment of anger. And, of course, one thing leads to another.
Take a close look at the bald cameraman with the light blue shirt. If I'm not mistaken, when a woman begins yelling ahead in front of the boys, the Muslim boy in the beige hooded top wearing a black cap starts walking fast towards the commotion.
Now check out the cameraman who follows him from behind – he “taps” or “hits” the boy on the head or shoulders to get his attention to turn around so he can capture the boy's picture in anger. Of course, this works a treat, as the boy probably feels he's being attacked from behind. He falls for it, adding in turn to the fight. Also, note the fact that the boys yell at the paparazzi to “STAY AWAY!" Why would you yell “stay away” unless you feel you are being attacked?
It's a pity the scene starts too early to show how the media horde assists in instigating the fight. It's reminiscent of how the paparazzi would annoy their prey (insert name of movie star here) to provoke some reaction from them, to get the "money shot."
The media is not as innocent as they would like to portray themselves. They've successfully created a picture of young Muslim boys being violent in public, when the truth is the media instigated or at least helped create the havoc.
I don't condone any violence, but just listen to that cameraman at the end of the brawl before the boys walk away – he swears and yells: “You have no idea guys.”
What? Like no idea that the pictures he took would have set the boys up to look like terrorists from the Middle East?
Back to Top |
LOL DIDI, watch the footage buddy... instigated or not 5 on 1... en gypsies, end of story... |
|
|
|
|
