|
Gay people artificially inseminating... (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Boomer187 |
my only question is where has it been proven that a child can only be healthy if raised in a stable environment with a man and a womam?
I bet none of you have read BF Skinners Walden 2, in it he creates a community of people that live by his view of behaviorism. Children are reared in a controlled environment, and there are some more changes, but the point of the whoel thing is that we should empirically test our customs and beliefs to see if they are the most efficient ways.
See the only problem I have here is that you just assume being raised by a man and woman makes it a stable environment, well where is your proof? Id suggest looking in the closet ;) |
|
|
| jonSun |
| Im gonna raise my son to be a gay woman. |
|
|
| chojin |
| so its healthy if daddy is rimming daddy in the other room? |
|
|
| jonSun |
| quote: | Originally posted by chojin
so its healthy if daddy is rimming daddy in the other room? |
Only if they are using protection. ;) |
|
|
| chojin |
| quote: | Originally posted by jonSun
Only if they are using protection. ;) |
:rolleyes: |
|
|
| Boomer187 |
| quote: | Originally posted by chojin
so its healthy if daddy is rimming daddy in the other room? |
wtf does healthy mean? im confused. |
|
|
| Aquarian |
| quote: | Originally posted by chojin
so its healthy if daddy is rimming daddy in the other room? |
Why isn't it? Your argument has no logical basis. You're just using circular reasoning here; A is wrong because A is wrong. |
|
|
| chojin |
| quote: | Originally posted by Boomer187
wtf does healthy mean? im confused. |
'Indicative of sound, rational thinking or frame of mind: a healthy attitude. ' |
|
|
| Aquarian |
| quote: | Originally posted by Boomer187
wtf does healthy mean? im confused. |
While we're on that subject, I'd like to see an heterosexual parent who's completely "healthy" and "normal" |
|
|
| chojin |
| quote: | Originally posted by Aquarian
Why isn't it? Your argument has no logical basis. You're just using circular reasoning here; A is wrong because A is wrong. |
child sees man + woman having sex:
logical explanation, you tell the kid where babys come from
child sees man loving:
....
well, theres no easy way of explaining it.
------------------------------------------------------------------
On a seperate note, if they wanna do this then whatever. just bringing a child into that environment is wrong. i dont know what's happening with the world nowadays. |
|
|
| Aquarian |
| quote: | Originally posted by chojin
child sees man + woman having sex:
logical explanation, you tell the kid where babys come from
child sees man loving:
....
well, theres no easy way of explaining it.
|
So why not;
Child sees man lurve:
you tell the kid where babies come from
Besides, what kind of freak lets their kids watch when they're having sex? |
|
|
| Aquarian |
| quote: | Originally posted by chojin
On a seperate note, if they wanna do this then whatever. just bringing a child into that environment is wrong. i dont know what's happening with the world nowadays. |
And again with your circular reasoning. Why is it wrong? |
|
|
|
|
