|
9/11 Documentary - WATCH it in here
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Cyrus King |
Hey guys... im not one to beleive much in conspiracy theories.. but all of us know there is SOMETHING fishy that happened predating 9/11 and afterwards. Obviously there are way too many conspiracy throries circling the attacks.. however.... most of them center around the US government being involved in the attacks somehow.
I watched this documentary and it caught my attention.
Click the link and watch the film.. its about an 1:20 hrs and goes into detail about many interesting things.
Tell me what you think.
P.S I know this should have gone into that other massive thread.. but i think it deserved a thread of its own.
[[ LINK REMOVED ]]
|
|
|
| donnybrasco |
| quote: | Originally posted by Cyrus King
P.S I know this should have gone into that other massive thread.. but i think it deserved a thread of its own.
[[ LINK REMOVED ]]
|
You couldn't be more wrong. :haha: |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by donnybrasco
You couldn't be more wrong. :haha: |
. if donny and i keep agreeing i might have to top myself.
this movie is boring, clutches at the stupidest of straws and if i wasnt convinced that the govt wasnt behind the attacks this did it for me. |
|
|
| sensorium |
Well, the music selection in this documentary is very poor. And the mixing in the ending credits was horrible! It was just fading out one song and fading in the next one. Very, very bad.
In a more broad view, governments, the ones with the most power, are capable to do what they please and manage to get away with it. Even in these modern days when technology allows you, the skeptical citizen, to do so much, it's impossible to fight against a government. The governments will always have the upper hand. They have arms and they can use them to kill you. They have intelligence, not the ones making the speeches, and can use it to harm you. They can do whatever they want, without a warrant.
It wouldn't surprise me if the US govt. were behind all this 9-11 attack. Unfortunately, there isn't enough evidence to support this idea. So I’ll continue believing strongly that this attack was planned by X. I can live with that.
There is a lot of confusion surrounding this event and will most likely remain like that unless someone invents some type of magical sand that can make a person turn back in time like in the Prince of Persia. If that ever happens, a person could use this sand and take a camera with him so he can tape whatever is necessary. Hey, if this sand is ever invented I'll volunteer to do the taping, for free. I have some stuff I have to change about my past so I might as well kill two birds with one stone and be a hero to be remembered for ages. |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
| quote: | Originally posted by donnybrasco
You couldn't be more wrong. :haha: |
Seriously, there are plenty that are better than that one - you just have to look for them.
Here's a couple:
[[ LINK REMOVED ]]
[[ LINK REMOVED ]]
|
|
|
| Fir3start3r |
Wasn't this link posted before?
I seem to remember the loose change title...:conf: |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
| quote: | Originally posted by Fir3start3r
Wasn't this link posted before?
I seem to remember the loose change title...:conf: |
That was the first revision of the Loose Change series.
I thought that you were more astute than this, Fir3start3r. I guess I just figured that you would have known that, given the your self-assured, outspoken nature on this board. |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
I'd like to hear some people try and refute Mr. Ruppert's arguments. I'm pretty poor right now, but I'd still be willing to give $20 to the first person who can successfully do so. Maybe some other people would be willing to throw some money into the pot as well.
Any takers?
http://www.911busters.com/video/WMV...Morning_911.wmv |
|
|
| Fir3start3r |
| quote: | Originally posted by Trancer-X
That was the first revision of the Loose Change series.
I thought that you were more astute than this, Fir3start3r. I guess I just figured that you would have known that, given the your self-assured, outspoken nature on this board. |
I don't pretend to know everything...:p |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
| quote: | Originally posted by Fir3start3r
I don't pretend to know everything...:p |
Well, you definitely seem pretty self-assured in your constant attempts to refute anyone who doesn't agree with the government's conspiracy theory regarding 9/11 - even though it's riddled with glaring omissions, distortions and inconsistencies which have and will continue to be pointed out all over the web.
I guess I just don't understand how someone could be such a shill - but maybe that's really my fault for not being able to fully empathize.  |
|
|
| Fir3start3r |
| quote: | Originally posted by Trancer-X
Well, you definitely seem pretty self-assured in your constant attempts to refute anyone who doesn't agree with the government's conspiracy theory regarding 9/11 - even though it's riddled with glaring omissions, distortions and inconsistencies which have and will continue to be pointed out all over the web.
I guess I just don't understand how someone could be such a shill - but maybe that's really my fault for not being able to fully empathize. |
?
Not sure what you're getting at since you cut and paste 1000x more than I ever did...(or anyone else here for that matter).
Sorry if I don't subscribe to 100,000 word essay route...THAT IMHO is shrilling...
My posts are never too long nor insipid because I don't believe in wasting others' time when a one (or so) full screen of text will do...
The fact that I don't agree with 9/11 theories or conspiracies, which are also by the way, VERY full of holes and innuendos, doesn't mean I don't entertain the fact that there could have been.
I've never been that close minded. However, because I choose to be on the opposite site of an arguement doesn't surmise ignorance or "shrilling" on my behalf... |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
| quote: | Originally posted by Fir3start3r
?
Not sure what you're getting at since you cut and paste 1000x more than I ever did...(or anyone else here for that matter).
Sorry if I don't subscribe to 100,000 word essay route...THAT IMHO is shrilling...
My posts are never too long nor insipid because I don't believe in wasting others' time when a one (or so) full screen of text will do...
The fact that I don't agree with 9/11 theories or conspiracies, which are also by the way, VERY full of holes and innuendos, doesn't mean I don't entertain the fact that there could have been.
I've never been that close minded. However, because I choose to be on the opposite site of an arguement doesn't surmise ignorance or "shrilling" on my behalf... |
Is it my fault that you're lacking in reading proficiency? Just because you have a short attention span doesn't mean that I'm going to stop posting relevant information and documentation regarding anything that I see fit. If it's looooong, so be it. Just because you're fully content with being dumbed down doesn't mean that I'm ready to accept that same fate.
And so what if I copy and paste a lot? Should I start regurgitating all of that very same info via my own, unique posts - or would my point be more effectively conveyed through a simple copy and paste job? I guess it's subjective, but I often choose the latter mostly because I'm not a big fan of typing, and secondly because I enjoy listening to a multitude of individuals who all seem to share common thoughts and ideas. |
|
|
|
|
