|
Xone62
|
View this Thread in Original format
| serban |
Hi,
I'm just wondering of the people who have used this mixer or own it what you think of it and whether it was worth the investment.
Thanks.... |
|
|
| Fearless One |
| i don't have it and i haven't used one but belive me it's worth :p |
|
|
| DOOMBOT |
| quote: | Originally posted by Fearless One
i don't have it and i haven't used one but belive me it's worth :p |
What? |
|
|
| Fearless One |
| quote: | Originally posted by DOOMBOT
What? |
nuffin |
|
|
| Basstard |
| it sucks to be honest. you'd be better off investing in a T1000 or a T101 |
|
|
| serban |
| whats a T1000 or T101?? |
|
|
| Low Profile |
Personally I've never used one, but I feel that for the price of this mixer you can get something with more features. I mean, having the filters is great and all, but for well over a grand you MUST be able to get more...
(I know A&H are some of the best mixers in the world, and if I could I'd sell my mother for a Xone 92 :p ... But they're just so rediculously expensive).
If you got the capital, go for it, if money is an issue, there are other mixers that offer similar features for half the price. (that's a figure of speech, btw :p ... ) |
|
|
| Basstard |
| quote: | Originally posted by serban
whats a T1000 or T101?? |
n00b :rolleyes: |
|
|
| serban |
| quote: | Originally posted by Basstard
n00b :rolleyes: |
maybe it would be nice to explain what they are... sorry i dont know all the mixers out there thats why i posted in the first place... |
|
|
| DOOMBOT |
| quote: | Originally posted by Basstard
n00b :rolleyes: |
ass :rolleyes: |
|
|
| Basstard |
| quote: | Originally posted by serban
maybe it would be nice to explain what they are... sorry i dont know all the mixers out there thats why i posted in the first place... |
google is your buddy. and im trying to be helpful sorry if i come off differently. i stand by my first post tho - id rather have a T1000 or a T101 over a Xone62 ANYDAY. Better build quality, better features, depending on one's taste - better on the eyes |
|
|
|
|
