|
Drugs companies 'inventing diseases to boost their profits'
|
View this Thread in Original format
| arek |
PHARMACEUTICAL companies are systematically creating diseases in order to sell more of their products, turning healthy people into patients and placing many at risk of harm, a special edition of a leading medical journal claims today.
The practice of “diseasemongering” by the drug industry is promoting non-existent illnesses or exaggerating minor ones for the sake of profits, according to a set of essays published by the open-access journal Public Library of Science Medicine.
The special issue, edited by David Henry, of Newcastle University in Australia, and Ray Moynihan, an Australian journalist, reports that conditions such as female sexual dysfunction, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and “restless legs syndrome” have been promoted by companies hoping to sell more of their drugs.
Other minor problems that are a normal part of life, such as symptoms of the menopause, are also becoming increasingly “medicalised”, while risk factors such as high cholesterol levels or osteoporosis are being presented as diseases in their own right, according to the editors.
“Disease-mongering turns healthy people into patients, wastes precious resources and causes iatrogenic (medically induced) harm,” they say. “Like the marketing strategies that drive it, disease-mongering poses a global challenge to those interested in public health, demanding in turn a global response.”
Doctors, patients and support groups need to be more aware that pharmaceutical companies are taking this approach, and more research is needed into the changing ways in which conditions are presented, according to the writers.
Disease-awareness campaigns are often funded by drug companies, and “more often designed to sell drugs than to illuminate or inform or educate about the prevention of illness or the maintenance of health”, they say.
Particular conditions that are highlighted in the journal include sexual function in both men and women. The prevalence of female sexual dysfunction, one paper claims, has been highly exaggerated to provide a new market for drugs, while the makers of anti-impotence medicines, such as Viagra and Cialis, have been involved with their presentation as lifestyle drugs that can boost the sexual prowess of healthy men.
Ordinary shyness is routinely presented as a social anxiety disorder and treated with antidepressants, while newly identified conditions such as “restless legs syndrome” — a constant urge to move one’s legs — are presented as being much more common than they really are.
Richard Ley, of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, rejected the accusations, pointing out that Britain has firm safeguards against disease-mongering. Many of the authors’ criticisms, he said, were aimed squarely at countries such as the United States, where pharmaceuticals can be openly advertised directly to patients.
“Drug companies are not allowed to communicate directly with patients, and we do not invent diseases,” he said.
“We provide information that there are treatments out there that might help certain conditions, but at the end of the day it is down to health professionals to decide if they are appropriate.
“The best safeguard is that the doctor who knows the product and knows the patient’s history is the one who decides what to prescribe.”
TRICK OR TREAT?
MENOPAUSE
Symptoms include hot flushes, night sweats and loss of libido
Criticism too often “medicalised” as part of a “disorder” when it is a normal phase of life
IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME
Symptoms include constipation, cramps and diarrhoea
Criticism promoted by drug companies as a serious illness needing therapy, when it is usually a mild problem
SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION
Symptoms impotence in men, lack of libido or difficulty becoming aroused in women
Criticism drugs such as Viagra marketed not only for treating genuine erectile dysfunction caused by medical problems but as lifestyle improvers
OSTEOPOROSIS
Symptoms thinning of the bones, particularly among postmenopausal women
Criticism portrayed as a disease in its own right, when it is really a risk factor for broken bones
RESTLESS LEGS
Symptoms urge to move legs because of unpleasant feelings, often at night
Criticism prevalence of a relatively rare condition exaggerated by the media, along with the need for treatment
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/articl...2128371,00.html |
|
|
| rabbitjoker |
| Conspiracy theory. |
|
|
| spazzilla |
Beware the government and aliens are also involved. I heard it from a friend of a friend.
I'm wearing my tinfoil underwear.
P.S.
Just for the record. I believe they do this and the doctor's help them. You go in with a cold and the next thing you know you're taking morphine. I love my doctor... |
|
|
| milos |
watch the movie The Constant Gardener
it's the same type of deal, and i'm sure it really happens in the world. |
|
|
| Floorwhore |
| quote: | Originally posted by spazzilla
I'm wearing my tinfoil underwear.
|
lol |
|
|
| Tordan |
| quote: | Originally posted by milos
watch the movie The Constant Gardener
it's the same type of deal, and i'm sure it really happens in the world. |
that movie was about illegal drugs tests and not about disease-mongering from what i remember. good movie nontheless, i highly recomend it.
this article is pretty believable but it offers no proof.
why is it that the US allows drug companies to advertise directly to the consumer? i agree with the policy of letting the healthcare professional decide what medication the patient needs. |
|
|
| cono_sur |
| quote: | Originally posted by Tordan
why is it that the US allows drug companies to advertise directly to the consumer? i agree with the policy of letting the healthcare professional decide what medication the patient needs. |
And what will happen then? The healthcare professional will push the ones that they are paid to push. :conf: |
|
|
| Tordan |
| quote: | Originally posted by cono_sur
And what will happen then? The healthcare professional will push the ones that they are paid to push. :conf: |
they need to adhere to a strong code of ethics but there are a few that do this sort of thing. the rest can be influenced though by the tactics of pharmaceutical sales ppl. they are only human after all. but still, they are more educated and informed on these drugs than the general patient and should make the call on which drug to go with depending on the case. patients on the other hand see it being advertised on TV and think it’s the best drug out there for their condition. this could be true, but they don't know any better. |
|
|
| 7-4-7 |
| quote: | Originally posted by rabbitjoker
Conspiracy theory. |
do elaborate...cause that response seems like a cop-out. |
|
|
| Vivid Boy |
| since we're on the subject. i hate GNC. |
|
|
| infinity HiGH |
| quote: | Originally posted by rabbitjoker
Conspiracy theory. |
I disagree. |
|
|
| DJ_Elyot |
I think that in an ideal world, all drug research and manufacturing would be run by the government... kinda like Canada post. Not 100% paid out of tax dollars, but run by the government.
To me, it's really dangerous when private enterprise is in a position where it makes more money when the public is sicker. No matter how many rules the government puts in place, they always find new ways of screwing people over.
But there's a problem with the public too... anybody who buys viagra because they think it's gonna make them a better man in bed is on crack. Sadly enough though, that kind of ty marketing must work on some non-empty subset of the human population, otherwise they wouldn't put the cash into it. |
|
|
|
|
