|
Evolution question..................... (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| colonelcrisp |
| Theresa is a creationist????? |
|
|
| Vlad |
| quote: | Originally posted by dcougar99
i happen to think we came from God... not apes |
Really? Prove it in another way other than... its in a book written by man.
Here are the recovered bones from a 4 million year old hominid.
Also, if humans were created by god, why are all fossils discovered by anthropologists of apes?
Also, why are we all so genetically similar with all living things, and Im not talking 30-40%... Im talking 80-90%. |
|
|
| Cloudburst |
| quote: | Originally posted by Vlad
Really? Prove it in another way other than... its in a book written by man.
Here are the recovered bones from a 4 million year old hominid.
Also, if humans were created by god, why are all fossils discovered by anthropologists of apes?
Also, why are we all so genetically similar with all living things, and Im not talking 30-40%... Im talking 80-90%. |
We have 95 - 99,4% same genes as the chimps. |
|
|
| weymouth |
| I agree with microevolution(mutation, recombination, natural selection) but macroevolution(changes in body design, species, new phyla) has way too many problems to be considered proven or scientific and is thus still a theory. |
|
|
| Aquarian |
| quote: | | Originally posted by weymouth ...has way too many problems to be considered proven or scientific and is thus still a theory. |
There are so many things wrong with that sentence... :wtf: |
|
|
| Subey |
| quote: | Originally posted by weymouth
I agree with microevolution(mutation, recombination, natural selection) but macroevolution(changes in body design, species, new phyla) has way too many problems to be considered proven or scientific and is thus still a theory. |
Why do you think others are incapable of seeing those "too many problems"? |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by colonelcrisp
Theresa is a creationist????? |
That's the only bit I paid attention to :p
It amazes me how popular creationism is in North America, though. |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by weymouth
I agree with microevolution(mutation, recombination, natural selection) but macroevolution(changes in body design, species, new phyla) has way too many problems to be considered proven or scientific and is thus still a theory. |
Different species, you say?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1123973.stm
Would this suffice, perhaps? |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Theresa
I personally believe the evolution theory is total B.S. However, I will openly admit that I don't know a whole lot about the specifics in regards to this theory. |
thats the way! have an opinion about something you know all about. good thinking there. cretin :rolleyes: |
|
|
| Theresa |
No, I am not a creationist.
LOL, and why would it be so shocking if I was? |
|
|
| Cloudburst |
That's what I was talking about earlier. Thanks for link. :p |
|
|
| Theresa |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
thats the way! have an opinion about something you know all about. good thinking there. cretin :rolleyes: |
I only believe it is B.S. because I believe something else to be true. Yeesh, I even said I didn't know a lot about the evolution theory, so take your meds and relax little buddy. |
|
|
|
|
