return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Local Scene Info / Discussion / EDM Event Listings > Canada > Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 
POLL: Should the Internet be policed by a regulatory body? (pg. 3)
View this Thread in Original format
sticky_shoes
quote:
Originally posted by EvilTree
Best way to combat child predators are to educate kids about dangers of internet and talking to strangers online.

Kiddy porn... Well, you can't stop that but there is already a policing organ devouted to tracking down child porn. But like all criminal activities, you can't stop all of it.

Because of actions of few bad ppl, the whole society shouldn't be punished.


I agree with you to some extent...but trying to track down these online predators wouldn't hurt either along with educating the children...

Currently there are individuals in law enforcement that are working to track down these online predators...

But if tracking these people would be done at the expense of our privacy then that would not be cool at all...

I think I've just made up my mind :)
EvilTree
quote:
Originally posted by dallastar
it should be YES, but it never will be!:nervous:

YES b/c of
*pedophiles


Ok. Just what percentage does pedophiles make up of internet users? Very, very, very fraction of 1 percent?

So you're in favour of restricting everyone else's privacy so that the police can go after that very fraction of 1 percent of sickos?

Needs of many outweigh the needs of few in this case, no?
dallastar
quote:
Originally posted by EvilTree
Ok. Just what percentage does pedophiles make up of internet users? Very, very, very fraction of 1 percent?

So you're in favour of restricting everyone else's privacy so that the police can go after that very fraction of 1 percent of sickos?

Needs of many outweigh the needs of few in this case, no?


I suppose you can think no to that but what I was mostly talking about was children pretors , that is more like what I was aiming at - haven't you seen that DATELINE special thats on every couple of weeks/months where these fukkin creeps talking over the internet to a supposed 14 year old on myspace website and these creepy men that show up to the girls house with condoms in their pockets, beer & liquor (when she is supposedly underage?), and other things such as pornography..ect. There is absoultly no way that they internet could EVER be monitored. The concept is just not feasible in any regard.

I recently saw on CTV on Septemeber 11th night news that there are so many conspircy theories on the net too, for example the recently the 9/11, people where claiming that the USA was behind the terrorist attacks. Which I think that's complete bull - and supposedly 1 out of 5 americans believe it! that's what ultimatly astounded me!

Anyways, it's can't be done, but it would be nice if it could be... Who knows what the freakin' net will be like in 2016? I can't wait to see........
ShadoWolf
We need less regulation of the internet, not more. What we need more of is PLUR.


Please don't mix regulation of the internet (ideas) with airport security; they're very different issues .
dallastar
quote:
Originally posted by ShadoWolf
. What we need more of is PLUR.


I think that's why I am here! ;) hey shadoWolf!
EvilTree
quote:
Originally posted by dallastar
I recently saw on CTV on Septemeber 11th night news that there are so many conspircy theories on the net too, for example the recently the 9/11, people where claiming that the USA was behind the terrorist attacks. Which I think that's complete bull - and supposedly 1 out of 5 americans believe it! that's what ultimatly astounded me!


Don't put too much faith in polls.

I bet ya if you run a poll with a question 'do you believe Bush ed Ghandi in the ass' 6% will say yes.
Cosmic Fur
Dallas, are you implying that people coming up with conspiracy theories shouldn't be allowed to do so?
dallastar
quote:
Originally posted by Cosmic Fur
Dallas, are you implying that people coming up with conspiracy theories shouldn't be allowed to do so?


not at all -

quote:
Originally posted by EvilTree
Don't put too much faith in polls.

I bet ya if you run a poll with a question 'do you believe Bush ed Ghandi in the ass' 6% will say yes.


HAHA :wtf:
Cosmic Fur
quote:
Originally posted by dallastar
not at all -


Then I'm missing the point of the whole story about 1/5 americans believing the 9/11 conspiracy theory
dallastar
quote:
Originally posted by Cosmic Fur
Then I'm missing the point of the whole story about 1/5 americans believing the 9/11 conspiracy theory


I said I watched it on CTV apart of the newscast that evening on sept 11th.... anyways, I never said any personal comment on any conspiracy theory, i just think it's bull that american government had anything to do with the terrorist attacks on Sept 11th... that's all, people can think what ever theories they want and post them on the net with videos/photo's/ect and the internet can not monitor these activities....

THE END

dallastar
[[ LINK REMOVED ]]
Jem_hadar
quote:
Originally posted by EvilTree
Ok. Just what percentage does pedophiles make up of internet users? Very, very, very fraction of 1 percent?

So you're in favour of restricting everyone else's privacy so that the police can go after that very fraction of 1 percent of sickos?


Agree.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 
Privacy Statement