|
RJT: 1, 21 Credit Semester: 0 (pg. 11)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Zild |
| Dude you suck balls at math. You forgot to collect like terms. X = 0. Give me a tougher one I like math. |
|
|
| Psy-T |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
Well evolution is based upon organisms adapting to a natural environment. Now If the environment is being altered by teh organism, natural selection is affected and thus evolution is affected by a non natural environment. |
do you realize you're saying that an organism is unnatural? lol
nature's effects being unnatural towards itself. :wtf: |
|
|
| Zild |
| Everything is made up of chemicals. |
|
|
| Psy-T |
| quote: | Originally posted by RJT
Fair enough, but I'll only conede the point to you based on the technicality that anything trying to prove something either "is" or "is not" would conform to your definition of quantification. |
you already conceeded that 'impurity' occurs with philosophers aswell, hence there's obviously more than 2 modes of being in your comparison :p |
|
|
| RJT |
| quote: | Originally posted by Psy-T
you already conceeded that 'impurity' occurs with philosophers aswell, hence there's obviously more than 2 modes of being in your comparison :p |
Which was clearly implied throughout this entire discussion. It's not as if this bears any significant impact on my philosophical construct of science. |
|
|
| Psy-T |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
6x+3=3x+3
6x-3x=3-3
3x=0
x=0
:eek: |
fixed :gsmile: |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by Zild
Dude you suck balls at math. You forgot to collect like terms. X = 0. Give me a tougher one I like math. |
here im working on this one now.
 |
|
|
| Psy-T |
| quote: | Originally posted by RJT
Which was clearly implied throughout this entire discussion. It's not as if this bears any significant impact on my philosophical construct of science. |
so why did you keep denying it? for my entertainment? :D |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by Psy-T
do you realize you're saying that an organism is unnatural? lol
nature's effects being unnatural towards itself. :wtf: |
no but im saying that compounds that cannot be easily recycled into the environment are not natural. Think about plastic that doesnt decompose into the soil easily. Or CFCs which make holes in the ozone layer.
Evolution is suppose to take time. hundreds of thousands of years. The environment is suppose to change gradually. Nature is not natural anymore due to the way us humans are treating the environment.
Thus the natural selection by definition is not based on a natural environment. |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by Psy-T
fixed :gsmile: |
thanks einstein ;) |
|
|
| Psy-T |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
no but im saying that compounds that cannot be easily recycled into the environment are not natural. |
how so? |
|
|
| Zild |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
here im working on this one now.
|
Ohhh thats a really good one triple integrals. I knew you had a good one for me. This will probably take me awhile as I'm just beginning my study of multivariable.
did you forget the differential in that integral or am I missing something? |
|
|
|
|
