|
HD-DVD vs Blu Ray: Which one is the best? (pg. 6)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| DarkAngel |
| quote: | Originally posted by kid nyce
da likes shemales LOL |
:stongue:
Nah, that's Psy-T. :haha: |
|
|
| spc |
 |
|
|
| RJT |
| quote: | Originally posted by TheDemon
:rolleyes: whatever. kids will be kids. let me know if you need your diaper changed.:p |
Oh snap! Sick burn - I'll be headed off to the hospital this instant!
:eek: |
|
|
| TheDemon |
| quote: | Originally posted by RJT
Oh snap! Sick burn - I'll be headed off to the hospital this instant!
:eek: |
Dont mess with the best!!:haha: :p |
|
|
| TheDemon |
| quote: | Originally posted by tubby
another potentially interesting discussion goes down the tubes.
|
Yes, I agree highly. |
|
|
| basvh |
| quote: | | those who don't see the benefits of higher image quality, its obvious that you never watched tv in HD. |
For my education I went to several broadcast conferences were all major tech companies show their proffesional equipment. I saw huge Sony HD beamers, HD cameras and HD LED Screens. Espacially those LED screens are amazing. So don't tell me that I never saw HD in full effect. That proffesional stuff I saw is way better then any bravia tv. So I know what HD is capable of. However, at this point, is it worth the investment? I say hell no. I will wait for a few years. |
|
|
| kid nyce |
| quote: | Originally posted by basvh
For my education I went to several broadcast conferences were all major tech companies show their proffesional equipment. I saw huge Sony HD beamers, HD cameras and HD LED Screens. Espacially those LED screens are amazing. So don't tell me that I never saw HD in full effect. That proffesional stuff I saw is way better then any bravia tv. So I know what HD is capable of. However, at this point, is it worth the investment? I say hell no. I will wait for a few years. |
i bought my sony when it was msrp 3500 i paid 2800 and it's now in the range of 1400-2k...how do you think i feel
part of an investment is accepting your dollar value over the longevity of the product. i've had my tv for a year now and i've been quite content the past year to say the least, every penny of that 2800 i spent is still being used, day in day out. |
|
|
| DeRangedMind |
| quote: | Originally posted by TheDemon
The only clueless one here is you. Clueless of your own immature attitude. I read all I needed of what you posted. and trust me, it was a complete disregard for respect. and it doesn't justify what you did, but its ok. You still need growing up to do. LOTS of growing up to do. |
Indeed that kids got some growin up to do |
|
|
| TheDemon |
| quote: | Originally posted by DeRangedMind
Indeed that kids got some growin up to do |
alot of growing up to do:p |
|
|
| TeKnoHe@d2025 |
Wired magazine AV-gear reviewer Daniel Dumas pits PS3 against Xbox 360...
The 360 HD-DVD player
After an easy set-up and navigation via the familiar Xbox 360 dashboard, flicks like Serenity and The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift played lag-free even when in-movie special features were activated. Colors, however, were slightly muddled and fine details were a little fuzzier compared to other HD-DVD drives.
Bottom Line: Among the worst players out there, but what do you expect for only $200 (Stand-alone units cost twice that.)
The PS3 Blu-ray player
The image quality is fantastic - sharper than the 360's HD-DVD counterpart. After subjecting ourselves to the hellish landscapes of Silent Hill and (shudder) Little Man, the color contrasts were nigh flawless - you could almost feel blood splattering in your face. Still, the interface suffers from Sony's counter-intuitive layout, but it's definitely improved from the PS2 as a movie player.
Bottom Line: A good player compared to stand-alone units. |
|
|
| DarkAngel |
| quote: | Originally posted by TeKnoHe@d2025
Wired magazine AV-gear reviewer Daniel Dumas pits PS3 against Xbox 360...
The 360 HD-DVD player
After an easy set-up and navigation via the familiar Xbox 360 dashboard, flicks like Serenity and The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift played lag-free even when in-movie special features were activated. Colors, however, were slightly muddled and fine details were a little fuzzier compared to other HD-DVD drives.
Bottom Line: Among the worst players out there, but what do you expect for only $200 (Stand-alone units cost twice that.)
The PS3 Blu-ray player
The image quality is fantastic - sharper than the 360's HD-DVD counterpart. After subjecting ourselves to the hellish landscapes of Silent Hill and (shudder) Little Man, the color contrasts were nigh flawless - you could almost feel blood splattering in your face. Still, the interface suffers from Sony's counter-intuitive layout, but it's definitely improved from the PS2 as a movie player.
Bottom Line: A good player compared to stand-alone units. |
:D |
|
|
| DjConfessions |
| i've read that both will lose to the 10-layer dvd |
|
|
|
|
