return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Other > Political Discussion / Debate

Pages: [1] 2 
Political Lies
View this Thread in Original format
junebug
There currently isn't a law in Britain to prosecute politicians who deceive the public. In my opinion this means that our votes are essentially worthless because politicians can do whatever they want for four years without having to face any consequences for their actions - the present political system of Britain does not constitute a working democracy. Any thoughts?
ResonantDrag
welcome to our world
Fir3start3r
..and ours.

We simply vote them out of office and hopefully, with total lack of votes, the party gets disbanded.
spiflicated
Since when have subjects in the UK ever thought they lived in a democracy?
Lilith
quote:
Originally posted by spiflicated
Since when have subjects in the UK ever thought they lived in a democracy?


Very few in the US seem to be questioning that lately as well...
'Patriot act'

Aside from that, the UK has old impeachment laws which apply to parliament, while they might be old, are still laws.
junebug
Well, the reason why I'm all fired up about this at the minute is because my politics loving friend introduced me to the following website the other day:

http://mo-truth.blogspot.com/

They have created a law entitled the 'Misrepresentation of the People act'and they are currently seeking an MP who'll help them get it passed through parliament. They've interviewed lots of MPs (&even the Lord Chancellor!) and put up the footage on the site. Today they are discussing how there is a parliamentary 'Committee on Standards in Public Life' but that this committee is essentially controlled by the PM, so it isn't independent. Hmmm, what use is the vote if politicians can do whatever they like as soon as they are in power?
Q5echo
quote:
Originally posted by Lilith
Very few in the US seem to be questioning that lately as well...
'Patriot act'


and it will remain the "very few" fortunately, until the majority feels it's no longer needed. yay democracy.
junebug
Apparently there is a 'Committee on Standards in Public Life' which is the main Parliamentary watchdog for ethics, standards etc. in Parliament. However, the committee reports and makes recommendations to the PM, he then decides whether to act upon them! Not exactly independent policing of parliament, is it?
junebug
By the way, if anyone is interested in discussing this issue I've posted on the beginners guide section of the website. Not had any luck yet, but would appreciate any contributions!
junebug
It is interesting that many people in Britain don't believe Tony Blair over Mahmoud Ahmadinejad when it comes to the capture of the Royal Navy guys 'n' gals...something to do with the government's track record?

shaolin_Z
quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
and it will remain the "very few" fortunately, until the majority feels it's no longer needed. yay democracy.


We're supposed to be a Republic, not a Democracy.
Spirit5
quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
We're supposed to be a Republic, not a Democracy.


Actually a "Republic" implies we are a "Representative Democracy" so we are still a democracy but not a direct democracy, meaning we elect people who are "supposed" to serve their constituients (though they serve special interests more than the people themselves). Who make laws for us. In some cases, we do vote on the laws being passed on local or state ballots like during primaries, but we don't actually make the laws (though we can petition congress to pass a law or create a bill for them to introduce). And that's a no brainer. And almost anyone is able to run for Congress or any office (look at what happened in California in I think 2002 during the election where Arnold got in).
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: [1] 2 
Privacy Statement