Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
oh cant i? so, you're saying this firefighter is lying? provide me with a SINGLE, plausible reason for someone at ground zero and part of the rescue effort for lying about something that they are a relative expert in their field concerning?
Look, he may have in fact been a Blackwater Employee in Firefighter's garb specifically sent there as part of the original plot to misdirect the transmission of reports to a degree indiscernable by the general public or even amateur conspiracy theorists privelaged by internet rumour!
Lilith
Ah come on, their parents pay for them to go to college & school, that makes them perfectly qualified to have an objective criticism on things that happened 1000's of kilometres away and discredit trained personnel on site.
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by wotyzoid
exactly my point. Just like You may not believe me I may not believe the testimonials. Unless they come up with logics that I can't relate too. Ignorance is bliss.
wtf? do you know ANYTHING about constructive debate? sheesh.
i have provided you with part of an interview from one fireman there on the day, speaking to firehouse magazine MORE HERE and detailing his experiences re WTC7.
you, on the other hand, asides from "oh, i dont believe you" have provided nothing to counter this evidence. that's all from me until you can show you really do have a commitment to engaging the topic at hand.
i can see what halycon was saying about you.
nope! no damage or fire here!
eRRaTiK
lol consider this thread...
...
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
schools, probably not. children dont have the capacity to assertain its accuracy. showing it in college or uni is fine imo.
+1, and a documentary with a counter-argument should be shown also.
quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
Look at me, I'm Theresa, I don't understand conversations so I make desperate attempts to curb them back to subjects I am familiar with blah blah blah
LOLLERSKATEZ!
wotyzoid
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
wtf? do you know ANYTHING about constructive debate? sheesh.
i have provided you with part of an interview from one fireman there on the day, speaking to firehouse magazine and detailing his experiences re WTC7.
you, on the other hand, asides from "oh, i dont believe you" have provided nothing to counter this evidence. that's all from me until you can show you really do have a commitment to engaging the topic at hand.
i can see what halycon was saying about you.
nope! no damage or fire here!
Well I supposed you saw when building 7 collapsed.
If you didn't here it is:
Maybe I'm not good at detail, but to me it looked a lot like this one but without the explosions in the inner columns.
"when we work for the government we're not THAT good at our jobs."
pkcRAISTLIN
anyway, im out of here. your initial comment that started this debate was clearly dishonest and disingenuous, and im not getting stuck into this with yet another ing idiot who think their "internet sleuthing" is somehow superior to all the investigations by real experts.
i hope you and your father enjoy your deep-seated stupidity.
SuspicionVandit
the WTC fell on JFK's head
wotyzoid
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
anyway, im out of here. your initial comment that started this debate was clearly dishonest and disingenuous, and im not getting stuck into this with yet another ing idiot who think their "internet sleuthing" is somehow superior to all the investigations by real experts.
i hope you and your father enjoy your deep-seated stupidity.
Experts? Where? You only came up with some firefighter testimonials. And lets clear this out. This is what my dad believes, not me. I also love how you appeal to insults when you state you aren't a rude person. Insults are a sign of weakness and defense if you didn't know. Hope you feel better.
venomX
quote:
Originally posted by wotyzoid
Experts? Where? You only came up with some firefighter testimonials. And lets clear this out. This is what my dad believes, not me. I also love how you appeal to insults when you state you aren't a rude person. Insults are a sign of weakness and defense if you didn't know. Hope you feel better.
If you really want to know more on this, there's plenty of debate that has gone on at the PDD. PKC is just usually rude and aggressive when it comes to WTC conspiracy theories. If you go read the PDD threat you'll understand why. He has documented his arguments better in the PDD thread, so if you are truly interested go read them there.
Taranis
quote:
PKC is just usually rude and aggressive when it comes to WTC conspiracy theories.
Only when it comes to WTC conspiracy theories :conf:
venomX
quote:
Originally posted by Taranis
Only when it comes to WTC conspiracy theories :conf:
Well mostly I would say :p
Lilith
WTC theories are enough to make anyone swear and curse.
Pro Tip:
America, after 60 years of bollocking the rest of the world, some people hate you quite a lot and are willing to fly planes into your cities and blow them up.
Because you keep electing idiots into power, regardless of party preference.
It is not your government, they're too busy invading people for oil, playing footsies in airport toilets and cheating on their wives. Actually giving them credit for having the intelligence managing to pull it off is about as believable as the easter bunny.
They aren't that smart.
