|
TranceAddict Top 250 DJs Poll 2007 Results (pg. 27)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Ghost Raver |
| quote: | Originally posted by element-y
Just my take. I think the production of a song is harder and more talent then djing strictly. So many like myself support the artists who produce and not just artists who play them.
So thats how they get our votes. They make killer tracks and play them at a club - dj them. If they do it well, they make our top ten. |
If there would be a Producer poll, would you vote the producers on it and vote the DJ's on a DJ poll? And maybe even actually vote the DJ's based on their DJ'ing skills and the producers based on their production skills? |
|
|
| Alex |
| quote: | Originally posted by element-y
how do i contradict myself? Producers get my vote above anything. I said beforehand, if a dj (producer) plays their tracks with other good tracks with no progression bull, just good song after good song, they own the dancefloor and therefore own the votes. |
:stongue: :stongue: :stongue: :stongue: :stongue: |
|
|
| isoterra |
| quote: | Originally posted by element-y
But, what am i saying, your all so right. Maybe im looking at the wrong dj polls. Djmag, tranceaddict, thedjlist... they must be all wrong. Thousands of idiots like me must be voting wrong. So in reality polls dont mean and number 1,000 is just as good as number 1.
GOD, how could i have been so retarded. |
nail on head ;) |
|
|
| SMC |
| quote: | Originally posted by element-y
Just my take. I think the production of a song is harder and more talent then djing strictly. |
Climbing the mount everest is harder than producing, do i become a better dj if i climb the mount everest?
Your take = fail. |
|
|
| bas |
| quote: | Originally posted by miketg23
...this is because house fans are generally stuck up people. House parties are loaded with posers, "VIPin" it,
dressing, and pretending to act in a fashion that far exceeds the majority of their modest, at best, salaries. |
Riiiigghhtt :stongue: |
|
|
| RebeL9 |
| quote: | Originally posted by element-y
Tracklist is the most important thing in polls and picking a dj. Not how they mix the tracks with filters and effects. |
yes but what does that got to do with producing?
I know DJs who never produced a track in their life but still are appriciated DJs. Your logic amazes me. But then again you are not alone. There are so many of your kind of fools which is why there are so many producers in every damn poll. |
|
|
| RJT |
| quote: | Originally posted by element-y
But, what am i saying, your all so right. Maybe im looking at the wrong dj polls. Djmag, tranceaddict, thedjlist... they must be all wrong. Thousands of idiots like me must be voting wrong. So in reality polls dont mean and number 1,000 is just as good as number 1.
GOD, how could i have been so retarded. |
Congratulations on your first intelligent contribution to this thread. http://img.tranceaddict.com/images/icons/icon14.gif |
|
|
| isoterra |
| i love this place sometimes :D |
|
|
| bas |
| quote: | Originally posted by element-y
how do i contradict myself? Producers get my vote above anything. I said beforehand, if a dj (producer) plays their tracks with other good tracks with no progression bull, just good song after good song, they own the dancefloor and therefore own the votes.
Tracklist is the most important thing in polls and picking a dj. Not how they mix the tracks with filters and effects. |
This doesn't make any sense. Like...at all :wtf: |
|
|
| element-y |
| producers are on because they dj. Therefore... they are djs. ANd if they have good sets, then they make top 10. Sets doesnt mean dj skills in effects and filters, its having a good tracklist. Transitions are the last thing on most peoples mind. So if a good producer plays their hits one by one and other good hits, with crappy transitions, the music is still great and people still dnace, making them top 10 djs. |
|
|
| RJT |
| quote: | Originally posted by element-y
producers are on because they dj. Therefore... they are djs. ANd if they have good sets, then they make top 10. Sets doesnt mean dj skills in effects and filters, its having a good tracklist. Transitions are the last thing on most peoples mind. So if a good producer plays their hits one by one and other good hits, with crappy transitions, the music is still great and people still dnace, making them top 10 djs. |
You thick , the whole point of this conversation is that we're talking about producers who DON'T DJ appearing on the list.
s sake, you truly are the definition of idiocy. http://ampprod.com/forum/Smileys/default/smileylaugh.gif |
|
|
| isoterra |
| quote: | Originally posted by element-y
producers are on because they dj. Therefore... they are djs. ANd if they have good sets, then they make top 10. Sets doesnt mean dj skills in effects and filters, its having a good tracklist. Transitions are the last thing on most peoples mind. So if a good producer plays their hits one by one and other good hits, with crappy transitions, the music is still great and people still dnace, making them top 10 djs. |
by that logic you could get booked anywhere just by handing in this as your demo cd |
|
|
|
|
