|
free energy and inverse gravity (pg. 6)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| dj_alfi |
| quote: | Originally posted by Dervish
I don't think this comment received enough plaudits. that made me laugh :haha: |
+1 |
|
|
| neovalkyr |
| quote: | Originally posted by Dervish
Hmm I've graduated from 5 unis at hons degree or masters level. I studied where Darwin and Maxwell (the god of electro-magnetics) and the current PM of Britain did. One of my degrees is in Electrical Engineering. And those claims are a pile of e.
Believe me, it's not us, it's you! |
So what exactly is so unbelievable/impossible? its ability to create energy or its ability to produce inverse gravity?
 |
|
|
| Omega_M |
| ^^ what sort of a stupid contraption is this ? Show me the governing physical equations. Then I will tell you why it is impossible. Giving dimensions of some geometric object or showing 15VDC here and there does not prove anything. |
|
|
| Acton |
| quote: | Originally posted by Omega_M
^^ what sort of a stupid contraption is this ? Show me the governing physical equations. Then I will tell you why it is impossible. Giving dimensions of some geometric object or showing 15VDC here and there does not prove anything. |
+1
plus i think the word "inverse gravity" is being missunderstood in this thread, i wish people would use something like anti gravity EFFECT instead. |
|
|
| 3F05Q |
| quote: | Originally posted by neovalkyr
So what exactly is so unbelievable/impossible? its ability to create energy or its ability to produce inverse gravity?
|
You are DONE!!!
That's an air ionizer!
The ion current creates airflow, however slight, downward and propells the unit upward. Think 'Ionic Breeze' from the Sharper Image. There is no 'reverse gravity'. This is still subject to gravity.
So yes, Omega_M... it is capable of flight, but calling it a "Transdimensional Lifter" is so hoakey. And you wonder why their credibilty suffers? |
|
|
| echosystm |
| quote: | Originally posted by Omega_M
^^ what sort of a stupid contraption is this ? Show me the governing physical equations. Then I will tell you why it is impossible. Giving dimensions of some geometric object or showing 15VDC here and there does not prove anything. |
the space dividing the copper wire and foil facilitates the generation of negative ions, hence the balsa wood sticks being applied for isolation. such ions cause some matter in the air to combine, creating a convection-like effect. this causes the unit to rise in the air, so long as current is maintained.
the underlying equation for the generation of these ions is δS = 0, proposed by Balagoj Petrusev, where the proper selection of the form of S articulates a universal principle that stands true in classical mechanics, classical electrodynamics, relativistic mechanics, non-relativistic quantum mechanics and so on. electrons are forced to the right via the Lorenz force law F=q(v^B) and the internal electric field builds up within the copper wire.
obviously, this is indeed not anti-gravity, but adheres to newtons laws of motion strictly; the laws of inertia, acceleration and reciprocal actions. |
|
|
| Acton |
| quote: | Originally posted by echosystm
the space dividing the copper wire and foil facilitates the generation of negative ions, hence the balsa wood sticks being applied for isolation. such ions cause some matter in the air to combine, creating a convection-like effect. this causes the unit to rise in the air, so long as current is maintained.
the underlying equation for the generation of these ions is δS = 0, proposed by Balagoj Petrusev, where the proper selection of the form of S articulates a universal principle that stands true in classical mechanics, classical electrodynamics, relativistic mechanics, non-relativistic quantum mechanics and so on. electrons are forced to the right via the Lorenz force law F=q(v^B) and the internal electric field builds up within the copper wire.
obviously, this is indeed not anti-gravity, but adheres to newtons laws of motion strictly; the laws of inertia, acceleration and reciprocal actions. |
The lorenz force law is F = QvB and not F=q(v^B).
and can you explain this for me....äS = 0, a partial derivitive of S = 0? whats the variable S?
EDIT* the PD symbol wont come up when i post, its been replaced by ä |
|
|
| 3F05Q |
| F=q(E+v x B) (x is cross product) |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| Wow this thread got pretty lame. |
|
|
| nefardec |
| quote: | Originally posted by Meat187
 |
that is the best lolcat ever |
|
|
| leph555 |
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
Wow this thread got pretty lame. |
+onez |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
well, unfortunately i dont have the scientific background to intellectually turd down your windpipe, so i'll just have to stick with "you're a stupid stupid cvnt".
thanks to everyone else with said background who filled up his neck with faeces.
i wonder what all the crazy -knuckles did before the internet? |
|
|
|
|
