|
This forum could quite possibly contain the biggest amount of stupid people (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| ohbeone |
| quote: | Originally posted by zabrak
Actually no, it is an undisputable fact that the beatles are the most revolutionary, influential, yadda yadda band of all time. It's not a subjective opninion, buddy. I can't just CHOOSE for the beatles to not be influential, oh god your logic is so horrendouse it makes me laugh. |
Okay...facts bases on what data? Most people used to think the world was flat. Did that make it flat? Nope. A lot of people think the beatles are the most revultionary etc etc ad nauseum band ever. Does that make it fact? No...it makes them popular and well accepted and thought if. There is no way to measure the things you are speaking of...it is not indisputable...if it were, would people here not be disputing it? If there were some end all be all way to prove it, it would be indisputable. |
|
|
| Palladium |
| quote: | Originally posted by ohbeone
Okay...facts bases on what data? Most people used to think the world was flat. Did that make it flat? Nope. A lot of people think the beatles are the most revultionary etc etc ad nauseum band ever. Does that make it fact? No...it makes them popular and well accepted and thought if. There is no way to measure the things you are speaking of...it is not indisputable...if it were, would people here not be disputing it? If there were some end all be all way to prove it, it would be indisputable. |
didn't you post this same kind of thread? didn't you say goodbye? |
|
|
| Darkarbiter |
Wow epic alt
on topic: right off... it is clear you were in a sexual relationship with several members of the beatles. Just because they all hated you because it turns out your not a real classic rock fan and really a trance fan doesn't mean you have to try and prove it to yourself by making classic rock threads on a trance forum. You have serious mental issues.
Also your anal sex skill sucks... learn some technique ffs
Just because they were the most influential on your ass does not mean they were the most influential on music in history. |
|
|
| ohbeone |
| quote: | Originally posted by Palladium
didn't you post this same kind of thread? didn't you say goodbye? |
I said goodbye. Then I took a deep breath, thought through some things and decided to stay.
No I didn't post this type of thread. My thread was about people having nothing better to do than to just insult others who have a different opinion than them. Way different. And let me just add to those who are telling the thread starter of this thread 'oh you're saying I'm stupid now' he actually didn't. He said that this forum has a lot of stupid people. Not everyone on this forum is stupid.
I don't agree with the thread starter getting so pissed about people being misinformed or stupid because that is something some people just can't help. Being jerks and doing nothing but insulting people...that can be controlled and that is what my issue was. But I choose now to ignore it. |
|
|
| zabrak |
| quote: | Originally posted by ohbeone
Okay...facts bases on what data? Most people used to think the world was flat. Did that make it flat? Nope. A lot of people think the beatles are the most revultionary etc etc ad nauseum band ever. Does that make it fact? No...it makes them popular and well accepted and thought if. There is no way to measure the things you are speaking of...it is not indisputable...if it were, would people here not be disputing it? If there were some end all be all way to prove it, it would be indisputable. |
this has got to be the most ill-concieved piece of garbage logic I've read all day. Sorry buddy, but every music scholar, critic, magazine, dvd documentary, book, you name it claime the beatles as the most important band in history. I'd love to see you dispute this. Only un-informed people dispute this. |
|
|
| MrJiveBoJingles |
| quote: | Originally posted by zabrak
Let's put it this way, released less than eight years ago, The Beatles' greatest hists album "1" (a very decent album by the way) sold almost 30 million copies. Led Zeppelin's one-off reunion managed to get
:eyes: ONE MILLION :eyes: people to register for tickets, easily making it the biggest concert by any single band in history. |
I wonder how many concert tickets 50 Cent sells on an average tour. Probably quite a few. Does that make him a brilliant musician?
By the way, I'm not saying that the Beatles or Led Zeppelin made bad music. I'm just casting some doubt on your assumption that popularity and quality have any necessary connection.
But the biggest point to address here is that you never really explained what you mean by "taking a type of music seriously." What do you mean when you say that you don't see how people can "take trance seriously" compared to something like the Beatles?
I hope you know that a number of people, many of whom know quite a bit about music, see the Beatles as nothing more than featherlite pap, stupid pop unworthy of being "taken seriously." But I'm sure that you would dismiss their opinions, right? And if you would do that, you have to ask yourself, why should we heed your opinion when you effectively call trance "lightweight" music? |
|
|
| zabrak |
| I'm sorry but there will be no other band within any of our lifetimes that will come close to the prodigiously astrnomical impact the beatles had on music and popular culture as a whole. |
|
|
| Ted Promo |
| quote: | Originally posted by zabrak
this has got to be the most ill-concieved piece of garbage logic I've read all day. Sorry buddy, but every music scholar, critic, magazine, dvd documentary, book, you name it claime the beatles as the most important band in history. I'd love to see you dispute this. Only un-informed people dispute this. |
Until influence can be given a viable form of measurement it can be disputed. |
|
|
| zabrak |
| quote: | Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
I wonder how many concert tickets 50 Cent sells on an average tour. Probably quite a few. Does that make him a brilliant musician?
By the way, I'm not saying that the Beatles or Led Zeppelin made bad music. I'm just casting some doubt on your assumption that popularity and quality have any necessary connection.
But the biggest point to address here is that you never really explained what you mean by "taking a type of music seriously." What do you mean when you say that you don't see how people can "take trance seriously" compared to something like the Beatles?
I hope you know that a number of people, many of whom know quite a bit about music, see the Beatles as nothing more than featherlite pap, stupid pop unworthy of being "taken seriously." But I'm sure that you would dismiss their opinions, right? And if you would do that, you have to ask yourself, why should we heed your opinion when you effectively call trance "lightweight" music? |
No no. I never said popularity=quality. I dismissed their idiotic claime that people do not even care about led zeppelin or the beatles etc. aynmore.
Also about the beatles 'pop music'. Their earliest compositions were mainly rock ‘n’ roll or R&B-rooted pop songs with the occasional ballad. But they grew increasingly eclectic as composers, arrangers and performers over the years. They composed songs and arranged them in a wide array of musical styles – occasionally fusing genres. |
|
|
| MrJiveBoJingles |
Okey doke.
But what do you mean by "taking trance [or classic rock] seriously?"
You still haven't explained that. |
|
|
| zabrak |
| quote: | Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
Okey doke.
But what do you mean by "taking trance [or classic rock] seriously?"
You still haven't explained that. |
nothing really. I was bored out of my mind so i decided to troll. I wanted to reply to those posts in that thread but I was away in Texas |
|
|
| Ted Promo |
| quote: | Originally posted by zabrak
nothing really. I was bored out of my mind so i decided to troll. I wanted to reply to those posts in that thread but I was away in Texas |
...
[/thread]
? |
|
|
|
|
