|
Texas school district to let teachers carry guns (pg. 13)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| PETRAN |
| I'm with pkc here. ing American south-KKK and all the crazy white-trash cowboys lol. |
|
|
| Zild |
| quote: | Originally posted by diggerz
I also think Zild is speaking for alot of people that have decided to remain silent, yet their prescence is thicker than air. |
I speak only for myself but I guarantee you if a majority didn't feel the same way as I do that the laws would change. But they don't because Americans value their right to bear arms. The statistics on being murdered or commiting suicide as posted earlier are so miniscule they pale in comparison to the idea that Americans would give up their rights so easily. So nine out of a hundred thousand die instead of three out of a hundred thousand. Oh noes!
I guess though if you're never had a weapon save your life you wouldn't understand. |
|
|
| bigsnail |
| 13 pages woot woot. |
|
|
| jonas |
| quote: | Originally posted by Fledz
Can the US get more retarded? Apparently yes :rolleyes: |
Can Croatian comments become any more asinine? Apparently yes:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: |
|
|
| bigsnail |
enough is enough. can everybody plz stop talking about Nazis, Iraq, and whatever else crap youre talking about that has nothing to do w/ the thread title. its entertaining and everything, but damn.
The question is, should teachers be able to bring guns to school?
I say hell no. i dont even like guns to begin with. plus i was always pissing my teachers off.....wouldnt want one of them to pop a cap in my ass :D |
|
|
| david.michael |
| quote: | Originally posted by Zild
Americans value their right to bear arms. |
UNGA UNGA!
 |
|
|
| Beat Blog |
| quote: | Originally posted by bigsnail
enough is enough. can everybody plz stop talking about Nazis, Iraq, and whatever else crap youre talking about that has nothing to do w/ the thread title. its entertaining and everything, but damn.
The question is, should teachers be able to bring guns to school? |
No one bought up Nazis, and I mentioned Iraq once in relation to certain neighbourhoods being more dangerous than a war zone, which is entirely relevant to the topic.
If you don't know how to hold a legitimate discussion, then don't. |
|
|
| Zild |
| quote: | Originally posted by david.michael
UNGA UNGA!
|
LOL ok nice argument there. You must have been the captain the debate team in preschool. |
|
|
| Beat Blog |
| quote: | Originally posted by Zild
LOL ok nice argument there. You must have been the captain the debate team in preschool. |
That does NOT make sense! |
|
|
| Zild |
| Yeah i know it was a stereotype not an argument, but did you have to break out the Chewbacca defense? Not fair. |
|
|
| PETRAN |
| quote: | Originally posted by bigsnail
enough is enough. can everybody plz stop talking about Nazis, Iraq, and whatever else crap youre talking about that has nothing to do w/ the thread title. its entertaining and everything, but damn.
The question is, should teachers be able to bring guns to school?
I say hell no. i dont even like guns to begin with. plus i was always pissing my teachers off.....wouldnt want one of them to pop a cap in my ass :D |
Ofcourse they should NOT be able to carry guns, the people who thought of the current policy possibly suffer from heavy mental disabilities (or plane stupidity!).
If we take into account the classic behavioural psychology of Albert Bandura and the important effects of "modeling" processes and "observational learning" on children's social development, we can predict thet the current policy could have catastrophic effects. In simple words, if children and teenagers observe their own teachers carry guns they could easily deduce that gun carriage "must be a correct thing to do" and that carrying a gun "For the purposes of self-defense is correct". Ofcourse the boundaries between "self-defense" and "aggression" is generally thin and gets even thinner in the younger minds in which higher mental processes (such as moral issues, the identity of the self, the role of the self within a complex social environment etc.)haven't matured and testosterone runs wild.
I don't think that one ever needs to draw from basic psychological processes in order to understand the common sense:
That more violence leads to more violence, more aggression leads to more aggression and that an increase in the number of people who support such policies would inevitably lead to an increse in the number of people who shoot other people for whatever reason-be it for "Self-protection" (although this is a very vague concept which can be distorted) or a typical bank-robbery.
These social processes emerge in vicious circles and it is surprising (i would say "Crazy") how goverments can't see that. I guess that even goverments are part of their own system. |
|
|
| bigsnail |
| quote: | Originally posted by Beat Blog
No one bought up Nazis, and I mentioned Iraq once in relation to certain neighbourhoods being more dangerous than a war zone, which is entirely relevant to the topic.
If you don't know how to hold a legitimate discussion, then don't. |
taken from someone who posted in this thread...
no, he never assumed that in the first place. We all know that the Nazis were responsible for igniting the war. Oppressive? Germany was a great place to live in if you were not a Jew.
learn to read douche |
|
|
|
|
