Originally posted by Frequency Frank
i'm definitely not smart
making references abouthe mk etc is pointless the
main issue is the establishment being a reflection of
thelite nothe public's interestsimple, taking courses
in sociology and economics might improve your
perception and perspective...
Frequency Frank
quote:
Originally posted by colibri
correct, stop making references abouthe mk etc the
main point is the establishment being a reflection of
thelite nothe public's interestsimple, taking curses
in sociology and economics might improve your
perception
lol
Where exactly in your "sociology and economics" classes did it say that personal attacks are an effective debating technique? Since most people have their retirement plans based on 401(k)'s, which are invested in the stock market, it is absolutely in the public's interest to be aware of results on the Street.
typing in smallight blue font and
sharing lettersimply to appeartistic
unfortunately
does not expressensibility.
colibri
quote:
Originally posted by Frequency Frank
...
y r still missing the point naive pal retirees and most
are making crumbs in comparison to the toplayers...
Frequency Frank
quote:
Originally posted by colibri
y r still missing the point naive pal retirees and most
are making crumbs in comparison to the toplayers...
I was talking about a corporation's right to make money, and how it can benefit society. Now you are talking about individuals within a corporation. 2 different discussions.
As your title states though, this is an opinion based discussion. It is probably best to agree to disagree ;)
colibri
quote:
Originally posted by Frequency Frank
...different discussions
not really i am not making distinctions of any kind as
all parties involved are humans however the distinction i
am conveing refers to the affiliation of persons to privilaged
self-given rights and advantages by the virtue of their
social standing and ability to legislate on their behalf
athexpense of the public...
Frequency Frank
quote:
Originally posted by colibri
not really i am not making distinctions of any kind as
all parties involved are humans however the distinction i
am conveing refers to the affiliation of persons to privilaged
self-given rights and advantages by the virtue of their
social standing and ability to legislate on their behalf
athexpense of the public...
The obvious argument here is if their legislative influence actually impacts the public in a negative way.
Again,this is an opinion based discussion, and at this point I'd say we should agree to disagree. Or, you can post to your heart's content, because I've had enough of this thread :)
colibri
quote:
Originally posted by Frequency Frank
if their legislative influence actually impacts the public in a negative way
an incredible cloud is blocking y sense of reality...
Frequency Frank
quote:
Originally posted by colibri
an incredible cloud is blocking y sense of reality...
All clouds are incredible. My favorites are the big puffy cumulus ones.
You amuse me.
sot
quote:
Originally posted by Frequency Frank
All clouds are incredible. My favorites are the big puffy cumulus ones.
You amuse me.
how bout those little fluffy clouds?
gmoney44
quote:
Originally posted by Frequency Frank
All clouds are incredible. My favorites are the big puffy cumulus ones.
You amuse me.
OMG me too! we should watch one day and see what dinosaurs we see...you amuse me Frank
Frequency Frank
quote:
Originally posted by gmoney44
OMG me too! we should watch one day and see what dinosaurs we see...you amuse me Frank
The Stegosaurus shaped clouds are some of my favs too.
gmoney44
quote:
Originally posted by Frequency Frank
The Stegosaurus shaped clouds are some of my favs too.
Velociraptor is my favorite..so when are we gonna go? Election Day?
