|
Obama's Aunt found living in Boston slum (pg. 4)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| MisterOpus1 |
| quote: | Originally posted by The17sss
dude... it only looks tiny because his belly is so big. In reality it's decent sized
cock-24 lyfe
;) |
I can appreciate the fact that you're, umm, *poking* fun at yourself.
But oh God did I really not need to see that picture....... |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
| quote: | Originally posted by MisterOpus1
I can appreciate the fact that you're, umm, *poking* fun at yourself.
But oh God did I really not need to see that picture....... |
I was going to mention something but I didn't want to dignify that post with a response. |
|
|
| Scottaculous |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
You know what's really pathetic? You, you ing plagiarizer. Are you even capable of an independent thought?
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/da...5107.guest.html
For anyone who ever put the slightest bit of trust in anything this creep said, read it and judge for yourselves. This is textbook plagiarism, the lowest of all intellectual crimes you can commit. When Josh pointed it out in that other thread, I thought it was a one-time thing, but this is now THREE times he's quoted verbatim from a right-wing website and passed the words off as his own.
The17sss, you are absolute scum. |
I don't know you Lebezniatnikov, but I think I love you. |
|
|
| Lebezniatnikov |
| quote: | Originally posted by The17sss
Pffft! Please. Call me Joe Biden?
Look, he simply articulates much better than I do exactly how I think and feel about most political related policies. When I've prefaced direct quotes in the past from him, just seeing his name is instant cause for you guys to dismiss the content of the words right away. When I leave his name out, I find that you guys listen a little bit more. If you ask me, "are those your words?" I'll gladly say no, they are Rush's. But I'm interested in discussing these topics with you people, and if leaving his name out is going to take away the up-front bias, so be it. |
That's such bull - it's interesting here that people are attacking the source, when in reality Rush did nothing wrong. He just had his own original ideas and thoughts completely ripped off by some guy on a discussion forum substituting Rush's words for his own lack of original thought or, as he puts it, "articulation."
If they aren't your words, it's dishonest to pass them off as your own. Period.
It's ridiculous to assume that we all want to engage in the intellectual masturbation of debating against Rush Limbaugh and whoever else's work you've pilfered and passed out as your own.
If you're not invested enough in a topic to devote a second of your time to expressing whatever opinion you might have, it's absurd to expect that we should do you the courtesy of responding to the substance of anything you post.
edit: Furthermore, you've completely discredited yourself to the point where I don't know whether you've ever "articulated" your own honest opinion, much less whether or not you have the balls to stand behind whatever opinions you espouse with your own words. |
|
|
| Krypton |
| Goddamnit the17sss, I'm in a packed university library...:whip: |
|
|
| guerra-monstru |
| I can think of nothing more horrible than John Mccain leaving his model wife after she became paraplegic and lost all her looks. The same wife that stood by him during Vietnam and the events afterword. And him settleing down with a women nearly half his age and another model. And she was rich too. |
|
|
| The17sss |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
That's such bull - it's interesting here that people are attacking the source, when in reality Rush did nothing wrong. He just had his own original ideas and thoughts completely ripped off by some guy on a discussion forum substituting Rush's words for his own lack of original thought or, as he puts it, "articulation."
If they aren't your words, it's dishonest to pass them off as your own. Period.
It's ridiculous to assume that we all want to engage in the intellectual masturbation of debating against Rush Limbaugh and whoever else's work you've pilfered and passed out as your own.
If you're not invested enough in a topic to devote a second of your time to expressing whatever opinion you might have, it's absurd to expect that we should do you the courtesy of responding to the substance of anything you post.
edit: Furthermore, you've completely discredited yourself to the point where I don't know whether you've ever "articulated" your own honest opinion, much less whether or not you have the balls to stand behind whatever opinions you espouse with your own words. |
The topics come fast and furious... when a hot one comes up that I hear about, I don't have time to write a ing term paper to your liking. So in the case if the issue this thread began with, which I was interested in making into a discussion, I put together the best laid out set-up for it (from my perspective) using Rush's words. But you are assuming I was passing the words off as my own... I was not. If anyone asked for a source, I would have given it. Sometimes I lay out the source, sometimes I don't. When people ask for it, I never say, "I'm the source bro... those are my ideas." I already explained why I didn't source HIM in particular; because you and others with your viewpoints are less likely to actually get into the discussions if you see his name, and you pay more attention to a topic's content when it's not there. Sometimes I like to see what you have to say about an issue, so if that's the best way to do it, that's what I'll do.
When did you become the decider of what constitutes as substance and what doesnt? I won't be losing any sleep at night if my explanations don't please you or garner your approval. Fortunately for me, I don't view you as some kind of standard bearer for anything other than being a fat angry jerkoff (yes, I've seen a photo of you, Humpty-Dizz). If you spent as much time eating salads as you do acting like you're a political/research savant, maybe your self esteem would be a little higher and you wouldn't act so hateful all the time. But what do I know?
I can already predict your response: you have to stoop to the level of making fun rather than facing the facts that I called you out on... shows your maturity... can't distract from the issue... blah blah blah. Hit me back as hard you you can, lyrical genious... I promise I won't need a tissue |
|
|
| The17sss |
| quote: | Originally posted by Krypton
Goddamnit the17sss, I'm in a packed university library...:whip: |
my bad... that photo was a little over the top. lol |
|
|
| The17sss |
| quote: | Originally posted by MisterOpus1
I can appreciate the fact that you're, umm, *poking* fun at yourself.
But oh God did I really not need to see that picture....... |
yeah... my bad. that image can get burned into the retna :nervous: |
|
|
| Krypton |
| quote: | Originally posted by The17sss
my bad... that photo was a little over the top. lol |
lol, there were at least several hundred students around me...:nervous: |
|
|
| DJ Shibby |
| quote: | Originally posted by The17sss
yeah... my bad. that image can get burned into the retna :nervous: |
Having any semblence of rationale, you will join the modus operundi.
And eventually, we will be free.
All things,
ALL THINGS,
come in stages. |
|
|
| Lebezniatnikov |
| quote: | Originally posted by The17sss
The topics come fast and furious... when a hot one comes up that I hear about, I don't have time to write a ing term paper to your liking. So in the case if the issue this thread began with, which I was interested in making into a discussion, I put together the best laid out set-up for it (from my perspective) using Rush's words. But you are assuming I was passing the words off as my own... I was not. If anyone asked for a source, I would have given it. Sometimes I lay out the source, sometimes I don't. When people ask for it, I never say, "I'm the source bro... those are my ideas." I already explained why I didn't source HIM in particular; because you and others with your viewpoints are less likely to actually get into the discussions if you see his name, and you pay more attention to a topic's content when it's not there. Sometimes I like to see what you have to say about an issue, so if that's the best way to do it, that's what I'll do. |
Don't act like you quoted the material and forgot a link - your original post is still there for everyone to see. Are you going to pretend you don't know what plagiarism is?
| quote: | When did you become the decider of what constitutes as substance and what doesnt? I won't be losing any sleep at night if my explanations don't please you or garner your approval. Fortunately for me, I don't view you as some kind of standard bearer for anything other than being a fat angry jerkoff (yes, I've seen a photo of you, Humpty-Dizz). If you spent as much time eating salads as you do acting like you're a political/research savant, maybe your self esteem would be a little higher and you wouldn't act so hateful all the time. But what do I know?
I can already predict your response: you have to stoop to the level of making fun rather than facing the facts that I called you out on... shows your maturity... can't distract from the issue... blah blah blah. Hit me back as hard you you can, lyrical genious... I promise I won't need a tissue |
Nice, way to work in the personal attacks. I bet your mother is proud.
Don't worry about my self-esteem though. This "Humpty-Dizz" was a two-sport athlete in college. I understand though - it does probably bother you that you got called out for academic dishonesty by a football player. |
|
|
|
|
