|
Are humans.. (pg. 6)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| yukii |
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
fix your settings n00b |
will do :tongue2 masta |
|
|
| Moral Hazard |
| quote: | Originally posted by yukii
will do :tongue2 masta |
It's my first time using this in the PDD but you left me no choice by using the word "masta"....
 |
|
|
| Lebezniatnikov |
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
good try but mine was better. |
True, but I'm convinced this is yet another example of someone not taking any higher education and flaunting his "superior" intellectual abilities for the enjoyment of all. The PDD attracts those types like flies. |
|
|
| yukii |
LOL! :stongue: :stongue: i was hoping you would get it ;)
im still confused tho.
he kept talking about 'THE CREATOR' and evolution is worth & says there's no evidence when he has ing evidence in his own ass- tail bone? wiggling ears? appendix? all remnants of our past .. i don't see where you could find moar obvious evidence.. :rolleyes: |
|
|
| Moral Hazard |
| quote: | Originally posted by yukii
LOL! :stongue: :stongue: i was hoping you would get it ;)
im still confused tho.
he kept talking about 'THE CREATOR' and evolution is worth & says there's no evidence when he has ing evidence in his own ass- tail bone? wiggling ears? appendix? all remnants of our past .. i don't see where you could find moar obvious evidence.. :rolleyes: |
It's called confirmation bias... people like that only accept evidence that supports the conclusion they have already reached... anything that does not support their conclusion they dismiss as invalid or rationalize it away with an utterly unsupportable argument (my favorite is when creationists contend that all the fossil record in support of evolution was placed there by God as a test of faith). |
|
|
| jerZ07002 |
| quote: | Originally posted by cronodevir
Yes, I know ti does because of the processes which I was born with tell me it is. It didn't require any exprience what so ever.
Google logic. Take a class, do something. This is all very basic stuff. They used to teach Logic and Rhetoric in school.
I'm done. |
i have a degree in a field of mathematics (quantitative finance - which is based on logic), and two advanced degrees in law (which is based on logic). thanks, come again! |
|
|
| yukii |
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
(my favorite is when creationists contend that all the fossil record in support of evolution was placed there by God as a test of faith). |
big big lol. |
|
|
| Krypton |
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
Hmmmm... you believe in the existence of a creator due to logical deduction; however, not in evolution. This seems somewhat at odds to me... if one were to examine all the evidence regarding evolution and attempt to reconcile that with their belief in the creator wouldn't the most logical deduction be that evolution is the process by which the creator creates rather then evolution is bull? |
It is a false dichotomy. The falsehood starting off with the assumption that evolution says anything whatsoever about god. It doesn't say there is a god, or that there isn't a god. It simply says how the world we see today came about, and that process is evolution by natural selection.
What's especially childish is their blind belief that if you disprove evolution, you'v just proven creationism. FAIL. |
|
|
| Krypton |
| quote: | Originally posted by cronodevir
A clump of carbon is a rock, its called a diamond.
|
Something called amino acids and organic compounds. |
|
|
| Krypton |
| quote: | Originally posted by cronodevir
Not really. You don't need evidence to know 8 and 8 make 16.
I know what 16 is, and I know what 8 is. Therefor to know that two 8's together makes 16, doesn't have to be demonstraited. Its an inate ability in every single person, to understand how things work using logic. You are only required to know the definition of the 8 and 16, and the function "add". But it doesn't have to be demonstraited for you to know how to use these things together.
Logic was not developed by us. It is part of our resoning process. Though many people ignore it. |
This is a syllogism.
Major premise
Minor premise
CONCLUSION.
The reason why you'r not logical is you assume the conclusion first but without any verifiable premises. Then you expect us to take your assumed conclusion as proof, and basically tell us to off, when we ask for some premises. |
|
|
| Magnetonium |
| quote: | Originally posted by yukii
big big lol. |
Where do you get these funny pics? Seems like you have a million of them. Would be great to know ... :tongue2 |
|
|
|
|
