|
Restarting the moderator debate... Sorry in advance (pg. 8)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Energy_3 |
all i have to say is that from a newbee outsiders point of view - the main point of concern i see (@,@) is in the way in which people are corrected, there is nothing wrong with people correcting people with regards to false or misleading info [and remember that person may not know it is in fact that - incorrect] but how one goes about re directing the information which others consider to be incorrect is the main crux of this issue.
for one, if someone is wrong, state it in a just manner - regardless of how long this has been going on - there is no need for verbal slanging IMHO!
Even if after someone has been corrected, and they still stand by there point of view, let them why argue the point (if you state under there post your point of view thats all thats needed ) let those that come and read such things make their own mind up about it.
And, i agree with you all here, when something is wrong, and facts support such a case then yes advise so accordingly.
Peace on earth is impossible - but peace on Trance Addict is feasible!
Look, i think who the hell am I to state anything here really, im new and what do i know - and im sure some of you think that. I just think look regardless of some ones personal inadequacies we must remain just mannered in our approach to each other - tell each other your wrong, but damm shizzam a budah bing limit the use of degrading!
I really hope this sorts its self out, for the best! |
|
|
| sixofour.604 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Energy_3
the main point of concern i see (@,@) is in the way in which people are corrected, there is nothing wrong with people correcting people with regards to false or misleading info [and remember that person may not know it is in fact that - incorrect] but how one goes about re directing the information which others consider to be incorrect is the main crux of this issue. |
This is what they don't realize. And are infact, quite oblivious to.
All that matters is that in their minds someone "wrong" got "corrected", manners and mentality have utterly no play in their consideration. And people wonder why a bunch of arguments occur. When someone objects to them, they immediatly assume the person is objecting to the content of the information rather than the context. |
|
|
| Energy_3 |
| quote: | Originally posted by sixofour.604
This is what they don't realize. And are infact, quite oblivious to.
All that matters is that in their minds someone "wrong" got "corrected", manners and mentality have utterly no play in their consideration. And people wonder why a bunch of arguments occur. When someone objects to them, they immediatly assume the person is objecting to the content of the information rather than the context. |
I understand what your saying - and from what i can see the context in which words are used are not considered too 'your right', thats how i see at this point in time anyways.
I mean, there is and in most cases, always constructive criticisms being used in opposing arguments, its just shame with what comes along with it (which i have mentioned several times). |
|
|
| Energy_3 |
| quote: | Originally posted by sixofour.604
This is what they don't realize. And are infact, quite oblivious to.
All that matters is that in their minds someone "wrong" got "corrected", manners and mentality have utterly no play in their consideration. And people wonder why a bunch of arguments occur. When someone objects to them, they immediatly assume the person is objecting to the content of the information rather than the context. |
I understand what your saying - and from what i can see the context in which words are used are not considered too 'your right', thats how i see at this point in time anyways.
I mean, there is and in most cases, always constructive criticisms being used in opposing arguments, its just shame with what comes along with it (which i have mentioned several times).
| quote: | | When someone objects to them, they immediatly assume the person is objecting to the content of the information rather than the context. |
yes i agree to some extent indeed this is the case - but there is clearly frequent debate (in an offensive manner) as well over one persons subjective/objective point of view with reference to the topic at hand. Which im sure you agree with too!
peace" |
|
|
| sixofour.604 |
| Well, I wouldn't call the crtisisms constructive. :) |
|
|
| Energy_3 |
| quote: | Originally posted by sixofour.604
Well, I wouldn't call the crtisisms constructive. :) |
well especially when the information being provided is coupled with slander - i agree!
you just have to sift through the to find the good in it |
|
|
| Numb |
| quote: | Originally posted by sixofour.604
When you walk by an ant hill, do you reason with them and act civilized? Or do you step on them and go somewhere else when it gets boring? |
Well, a sane person would just walk by. Or, observe (for whatever reason) and then walk away. Stepping on them "when it gets boring" is wrong and dumb for a number of reasons. One reason being that you might get swarmed and bitten the up. Which you would deserve for being not only cruel but also an idiot. :rolleyes: |
|
|
| david.michael |
| quote: | Originally posted by Energy_3
the main point of concern i see (@,@) is in the way in which people are corrected |
I can buy that... but, the thing is, it's not like it was just a one-off incident and people immediately jumped down his throat. It was a frequent recurrence, which makes people less patient.
Not that it doesn't ever happen on the first shot, mind you. |
|
|
| Energy_3 |
| quote: | Originally posted by david.michael
I can buy that... but, the thing is, it's not like it was just a one-off incident and people immediately jumped down his throat. It was a frequent recurrence, which makes people less patient.
Not that it doesn't ever happen on the first shot, mind you. |
yeah i gather that, like Digi made mention to me, its something that has been stewing in a pot for sometime now.
But it would be good if it could be resolved and for amicable communication to lead the way in this future |
|
|
| david.michael |
That seems to be theoretically happening in this thread now, in my opinion.
Will it stick? Dunno. But it's already begun to self-moderate itself. :) |
|
|
| Energy_3 |
| quote: | Originally posted by david.michael
That seems to be theoretically happening in this thread now, in my opinion.
Will it stick? Dunno. But it's already begun to self-moderate itself. :) |
fingers crossed! well hopefully with so much good intention around, the natural thing to occur would be for it this forum to take that direction
if not i reckon we bust out the whip :whip:
Im with you lets hope :tongue2 |
|
|
| sixofour.604 |
| Chances are in the next day or so digi or rann or someone will just do the same ole and we won't get anywhere with them. But we can hope. |
|
|
|
|
