|
why geeks get the girls (pg. 8)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Lilith |
Thought they'd more or less done away with IQ tests in the traditional logic and puzzle solving ability and moved onto Jung Myers-Briggs typology examination?
http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes2.asp
Extraverted, Intuitive, Thinking and Judging qualities.
While it isn't a by and by of who you'll be, its more about a persons personality when it comes to relationships than sheer 'processing power' of someone's brain.
| quote: | | the last is exclusive to one sex only :p |
Wouldnt bet on it... ;) |
|
|
| Fledz |
| Yea but aren't you a Lesbian? That can bend space and time so we consider you an outlier. |
|
|
| Lilith |
| Probably more bi than completely bent, a little more complex than just a black or white labelling and definition, so I don't bother to explain and be persecuted for it. |
|
|
| Fledz |
| No need to get persecuted for it. I don't really care either way :gsmile: |
|
|
| lenazi |
| i smell a man in the past that ruined her. |
|
|
| astroboy |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lilith
Probably more bi than completely bent, a little more complex than just a black or white labelling and definition, so I don't bother to explain and be persecuted for it. |
Well how the hell are we supposed to pigeon-hole you now?! :mad:
:tongue2
ps - damn forums are annoying to use on an iphone |
|
|
| Halcyon+On+On |
| quote: | Originally posted by lenazi
i smell a man in the past that ruined her. |
THE RUINER'S GOT A LOT TO PROVE, HE'S GOT NOTHING TO LOSE, NOW HE MADE YOU BUH-LEAVE |
|
|
| Halcyon+On+On |
| Oh, and geeks "get the girls" when they cease being geeks, or at least develop a side to them that isn't geeky. Not saying you have to stop being being interested in the things you like - it's more that you should branch out and have depth if you're attempting to attract somebody. |
|
|
| lenazi |
| or money and a penis like mr ed. |
|
|
| the_voice |
| geeks are fit and there sweet and kind :p |
|
|
| lenazi |
| so you are a bottom then? |
|
|
|
|
