return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Chill Out Room

Pages: [1] 2 
Proposed WTC 2002!
View this Thread in Original format
Tak
I get knocked down, but I get up again!

that's what's americans who are proposing the new WTC are saying, and are they ever bouncing back.
This building will be THE best in the world IMO, and is invulnerable to terrorists!
check out the sketch here .

Take that Osama!
Palivar
He drinks a whiskey drink
He drinks a vodka drink
He drinks a lager drink
He drinks a cider drink
He sings the songs that remind him of the good times
He sings the songs that remind him of the better times
Ohhhhh, Danny Booooy, Danny Booooy, Danny Booooy
Palivar
Munken
Is this a joke???? the text looks real, but i didn't read it :)

But the design look so unreal... looks like something from Sim City.
eXeTik
It's real allright, and was also posted here already...
ampburner
Am I the only one here who thinks it's kind of cool?
JohnSmith
invulnerable to terrorists?

well.. it might be better protected, but nothing is ever invulnerable.

i seem to remeber someone saying that the titanic was the unsinkable ship

:rolleyes:
lMIlk
everyone, say its cool but remember i'm the one who first posted this
Palivar
and remember, I'm the first one who replied to it :)
DuMonde TrAnCeR
quote:
Originally posted by Tak This building will be THE best in the world IMO, and is invulnerable to terrorists!
check out the sketch here .

Take that Osama!


you americans are funny, are you so daft enough to think the terrorists will attack them same target twice? so you spend n-billion dollars on creating anti-terrorism propaganda, yet you will all hail down to it because its "one over the bad guys" when infact its a large and inefficient piece of propaganda, i just hope some of you can see this, and not be blinded.

next hails the anti osama space laser, its costs trillions, doesnt do anything, but it can be used to destroy terrorist from space apprently!

Tak
quote:
Originally posted by lMIlk
everyone, say its cool but remember i'm the one who first posted this


Sorry dude, didn't see it b4.
Nadi
I doubt it will be built just because buildings of that size are not cost effective. In the old wtc almost a third of it was used for structural support etc, having many smaller buildings is much better than 2 huge ones.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: [1] 2 
Privacy Statement