|
That's an odd shape for a phallus... (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Ania_xox
I seriously doubt that these girls are attempting to drive any sort of political statement. |
who said anything about politics? i was referring to their right to express their sexuality however they choose without being judged by some nanny like you. honestly, if some random chick wants to act like a slut on the internet, why the do you care? |
|
|
| Slylee |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
who said anything about politics? i was referring to their right to express their sexuality however they choose without being judged by some nanny like you. honestly, if some random chick wants to act like a slut on the internet, why the do you care? |
you seriously can't see why this behavior would bother some people (who don't know the girls personally)?:conf: |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Slylee
you seriously can't see why this behavior would bother some people (who don't know the girls personally)?:conf: |
nope. just kids being idiots. i shudder to think i might've gotten up to had the internet been prolific when i was 15! |
|
|
| Slylee |
| i see. and you are just turning your head to the part about the parents of the kids supporting (and paying for) this law suit? |
|
|
| Arbiter |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
who said anything about politics? i was referring to their right to express their sexuality however they choose without being judged by some nanny like you. honestly, if some random chick wants to act like a slut on the internet, why the do you care? |
To begin with, if--as the girls themselves claim--they distributed photographs of themselves pretending to lick a lollipop-shaped phallus, then they are probably running afoul of child pornography laws; it's hard to argue that they have a right to express their sexuality "however they choose."
Even if they did, it's doubtful that this would produce some general right to be able to do so without being judged. If all you advocate is a right to do so without being judged by Ania_xox in particular then maybe I can get on board with that, but they have no right to escape my judgment. Moreover, I would have to think that any right to avoid being judged must be waived when you voluntarily memorialize your actions in the public record--in a document submitted to, of all people, a judge...
Accordingly, in this case I award them a score of 65/100 in recognition of their creativity in obtaining and using a genuine lollipop-shaped phallus for their attention-whoring. Had they used a mere phallus-shaped lollipop, as the courthouse news service erroneously reported, then their actions would earn a mere 42/100. |
|
|
| The17sss |
| quote: | Originally posted by Arbiter
On a vaguely related note, here's an amusing anecdote from a few weeks ago:
I was waiting for the subway when I noticed a gentleman sporting an erection of lamentable salience standing a few dozen feet down the platform reading one of the advertisement boards. After he walked away, I decided to see what the advertisement was all about and discovered that it was a poster apparently attempting to solicit support for some do-gooders. It featured a picture of a young crying girl and the following text (or something substantially similar): "Thirteen: the average age at which girls are forced into prostitution."
Although the causal connection between the inappropriate erection and the advertisement was unproven, I could not help but burst into laughter upon viewing the board. This appeared to offend a few other nearby passengers who presumably did not understand what it was about the advertisement that I found so amusing. Unfortunately, their reactions to my outburst only added to my amusement, and it took me a good 45 seconds to completely collect myself. |
LOL!! That story is truly hilarious, Arbiter. Keep em comin'
:stongue: |
|
|
| Omega_Blue |
| quote: | Originally posted by Arbiter
At least he made sure to note that it was large...
|
lol! don't forget that it was "multi-colored" too. that's it, whoever the journalist is that re-phrased what is, according to the official record, undeniably a lollipop-shaped phallus, has totally lost all credibility in my book. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Arbiter
To begin with, if--as the girls themselves claim--they distributed photographs of themselves pretending to lick a lollipop-shaped phallus, then they are probably running afoul of child pornography laws; it's hard to argue that they have a right to express their sexuality "however they choose." |
perhaps, but im not all that well-versed on the statutes of what constitutes child porn, given that licking a lollipop, however suggestively, doesn't quality as far as i am aware. i'll rephrase them; they have the right to express their sexuality as much as anyone as long as it is within the bounds of the law.
| quote: | Originally posted by Arbiter
Even if they did, it's doubtful that this would produce some general right to be able to do so without being judged. |
well of course not; anyone has the right to judge anyone for anything, it was a figure of speech.
| quote: | Originally posted by Arbiter
If all you advocate is a right to do so without being judged by Ania_xox in particular then maybe I can get on board with that, but they have no right to escape my judgment. Moreover, I would have to think that any right to avoid being judged must be waived when you voluntarily memorialize your actions in the public record--in a document submitted to, of all people, a judge... |
yeah, but is your judgement full of morality-led hypocritical bollocks? are you about to attack these children for doing something relatively harmless and stupid, because it goes against your own "strict" moral code, and then ask members of TA to send you photos of their cock?
| quote: | Originally posted by Arbiter
Accordingly, in this case I award them a score of 65/100 in recognition of their creativity in obtaining and using a genuine lollipop-shaped phallus for their attention-whoring. Had they used a mere phallus-shaped lollipop, as the courthouse news service erroneously reported, then their actions would earn a mere 42/100. |
:haha: lols, i should've read your whole post before replying :p |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Slylee
i see. and you are just turning your head to the part about the parents of the kids supporting (and paying for) this law suit? |
i dont think schools should have any right to punish students for their activities outside of school. so yeah, were this my daughter i would support the lawsuit. |
|
|
| Arbiter |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
perhaps, but im not all that well-versed on the statutes of what constitutes child porn, given that licking a lollipop, however suggestively, doesn't quality as far as i am aware. i'll rephrase them; they have the right to express their sexuality as much as anyone as long as it is within the bounds of the law. |
Licking a lollipop, probably not. Licking a lollipop-shaped phallus, probably.
In any case, I accept your rephrased proposition. |
|
|
| Demoted |
| quote: | Originally posted by Ania_xox
What the is wrong with girls like this?
My sister gave her boyfriend so much when she saw that some of the girls in his commerce group had posted videos of themselves on facebook having a pillow fight in their underwear.
Who has time to do stuff like this?
How do they justify what they are doing while they are doing it?
"OMG how fun would it be to kiss a dildo on webcam? I think this will make my day better! lets pin dollar bills on ourselves to up the anty"
it just screams daddy issues and "i wasn't loved as a child" and "the only way I know how to get male attention is to try to sexually excite him because I lack brains and the ability to keep up in an intelligent conversation"
no wonder guys act like sexist dicks
there are so many deluded broads out there whom I would love to kick in the face |
Yeah but you phonesex TAs. |
|
|
|
|
