|
Younger girls > Older girls. (pg. 9)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Silky Johnson |
| Speaking of paternalism, I wrote a really good essay last year about the short story 'The Yellow Wallpaper' and got an A+. |
|
|
| Halcyon+On+On |
| GOD. DAMMIT. Stop sharing your ing grades you ing keener bird! :mad: :mad: |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by Fledz
I wasn't talking about experience, personality or anything else. I was talking purely about looks.
The vast majority of time, women in their 30s are simply better looking than women in their 20s. |
In this case, I really really can't agree with you guys. I find girls in their late teens/early twenties to be the hottest in general :p
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
Would you say that Brazil has a generally paternalistic society, Lira? I really do not know, I have never been. |
Yes, I definitely would. Why? |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
GOD. DAMMIT. Stop sharing your ing grades you ing keener bird! :mad: :mad: |
Well I'm proud of it, ok? Can I not share the things I'm proud of with people I consider friends? God, you're an . That teacher was a particular bitch, to get such a grade from her was a big deal! :mad:
Also, I heard Danny Devito's voice when you said bird. |
|
|
| ivofivo |
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
Guys who prefer younger girls are obviously insecure faggots anyway. It's so obvious, especially if you look at the guys who typically date younger girls. Same with guys who like submissive types. Well, anyone really who prefers to be with someone that can be easily domineered. |
Biased statement...
How the fuk does dating a younger girl make one insecure?
I just prefer lower mileage and perhaps a sense of purity.
Young girls are consistently unintelligent when it comes to real relationships, that is what makes it interesting. I can honestly say I am tired of the same, vague, and interchangeable dates with women who have a set of goals. |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
Lol, you're 20. As if any of the chicks you've dated can seriously be considered mature.
And just because a chick is young, doesn't mean she has lower mileage. Most chicks are ing sluts, fyi. Especially ones in their early 20's, lol. Noob. |
|
|
| Lilith |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
You're not dating a bloody number. |
But you are going to step over the line that society draws where it attempts to protect its children from exploitation from adults because in most civilised countries we've progressed from the point that just because 'they can' doesn't mean 'they should'
Otherwise if it wasn't about a number, kids would still be sent up chimneys and into coal mines to suffocate and die, drafted into the military and sex industries like they used to.
There is a bloody number for a bloody good reason, its there to protect THEM and not about what YOU like. |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| quote: | Originally posted by ivofivo
Young girls are consistently unintelligent when it comes to real relationships, that is what makes it interesting. |
Interesting, right. You mean, you enjoy the feeling of control you get from being with someone who can't hold their own? Fag! Have fun thinking you're baning "pure" chicks who are actually gonna give you dick warts, lol. |
|
|
| Renzo |
I bet Lilith is kinky in bed. Doesn't she give you that kinky vibe, Hal? I know it. Just as soon as she's done telling you how successful she is, she s you so good.
So good. |
|
|
| Halcyon+On+On |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
Yes, I definitely would. Why? |
I would largely say the same of North America as well, though there have been many movements in the US at least within the last century or so to combat this in numerous ways. It's a difficult thing to answer from the inside looking out, but it seems to me that a specific attraction to younger people of either sex (discounting pedophilia, we're not talking that young) marks a concurrent phenomenon for linear sexual control over one's partner, as it seems general knowledge that younger people are typically more naive, innocent, more pliable to the whims of exploitation. I am not saying this is a bad thing per se, it is merely a thing. Respect for either sex is a socially ingrained phenomenon as well, ever since it became not ok to beat any pretty lady you see in the street and drag her back to your cave by her hair. I know, men got shafted pretty bad there, huh?
Though it seems to me that descendant latin culture is particularly paternalistic - like the man of the house is to be respected as breadwinner and generally sole decision-maker, everyone else under his roof is basically there to serve him. By no means am I implying this does not exist in North America, but the downplaying of the male through numerous extraneous historical and social clashes/events could have very possibly lead to a very distinctive shift in sexual objectivity along with it - the prominence of women as individuals and decision-makers, along with it the merits of which could be basically post-Freudian interpretations on what values to see in the opposite sex. Thoughts? |
|
|
| ivofivo |
| If you are a slut when you are 17, you are slut when you are 30. |
|
|
| Renzo |
What about if you're a slut when you're 65? Will you still be a slut at 85?
You know what they say - the saggier the breasts, the tighter the . Nobody says that, but it looks funny in writing. |
|
|
|
|
