return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Local Scene Info / Discussion / EDM Event Listings > USA > USA - New York

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 
so is anyone thinking about WMC 2011? (pg. 5)
View this Thread in Original format
yumpop
quote:
Originally posted by get nyce
<3u

smh all you want at me, but that's because i said what others wont

i got a negative opinion about something and crybaby team comes to the defense with insults

bitch needs to get off my dick already, she just mad i ain't sucking on her titty like every other young buck new to the scene


No , I don't like you because every comment you make is pathetic and miserable. No one gives a that you are over WMC. Have you ever thought that maybe you just were at the wrong parties? No one is on your dick. People don't kiss my ass like you say. I know a lot of people in other parts if the scene before ta and when I joined here, meeting people, many of them liked me, we chill together, that is what normal people do, not sitting there judging anyone like an over the parties they go to. I may have negative comments sometimes but they are for a productive reason. Get the over yourself, no one gives a about you.
get nyce
are you done yet?

ok go back to the plate it's on the coffee table


and if ur too dumb to realize it, you just played yourself AGAIN

quote:

Have you ever thought that maybe you just were at the wrong parties?


this bitch think she has an idea
yumpop
quote:
Originally posted by get nyce
are you done yet?

ok go back to the plate it's on the coffee table


and if ur too dumb to realize it, you just played yourself AGAIN



this bitch think she has an idea


Do not ing threaten me, you are very misinformed about me. You are making comments that are not true. You like this scene, you like parties? I will put you on blast with every promoter and club owner in the scene. People don't like when lies are made especially about what you are saying. You are going too far and you are really going to ing learn who I am. I will ing sue you for defamation for making like this up. I will have your information subpoenaed, you are going to be ed. I strongly suggest you stop making up.
AMMORA
awwww SNAP :stongue: :stongue: :stongue: :stongue: :stongue: :stongue:
Scoops
quote:
Originally posted by yumpop
Do not ing threaten me, you are very misinformed about me. You are making comments that are not true. You like this scene, you like parties? I will put you on blast with every promoter and club owner in the scene. People don't like when lies are made especially about what you are saying. You are going too far and you are really going to ing learn who I am. I will ing sue you for defamation for making like this up. I will have your information subpoenaed, you are going to be ed. I strongly suggest you stop making up.



ahahahaha weren't you going to sue people over at Rhythism for the same reason???

I wish you would grow a set and join some of us on NCC
AMMORA
hamster is running, but it aint on a wheel...
yumpop
quote:
Originally posted by Scoops
ahahahaha weren't you going to sue people over at Rhythism for the same reason???

I wish you would grow a set and join some of us on NCC


Rhythmism is different and no that was not what happened there, at all. I have friends on NCC and I don't need to grow a pair to be there lol. I am quick to come with my attorneys because I am not going to accept any sort of defamation.
hitokiri
*yawn* what i miss? WM who??:conf:
get nyce
quote:
Originally posted by yumpop
Do not ing threaten me, you are very misinformed about me. You are making comments that are not true. You like this scene, you like parties? I will put you on blast with every promoter and club owner in the scene. People don't like when lies are made especially about what you are saying. You are going too far and you are really going to ing learn who I am. I will ing sue you for defamation for making like this up. I will have your information subpoenaed, you are going to be ed. I strongly suggest you stop making up.


why you mad though?
Scoops
quote:
Originally posted by yumpop
Rhythmism is different and no that was not what happened there.


Frankie says otherwise

AMMORA
you wouldn't have much of a case...might as well just CHILL OUT

DEFAMATION
An act of communication that causes someone to be shamed, ridiculed, held in contempt, lowered in the estimation of the community, or to lose employment status or earnings or otherwise suffer a damaged reputation. Such defamation is couched in 'defamatory language'. Libel and slander are defamation.

Although defamation is primarily governed by state law, the First Amendment safeguards for freedom of speech and press limit state law. New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 264 (1964); Masson, 501 U.S. at 510. The scope of constitutional protection extends to statements of opinion on matters of public concern that do not contain or imply a provable factual assertion. Milkovich, 497 U.S. at 20 (rejecting categorical exemption of all statements in form of opinion; statement that may imply verifiable assertion of fact is actionable).

To determine whether a statement implies a factual assertion, courts examine the totality of the circumstances in which it was made. First, they look at the statement in its broad context, which includes the general tenor of the entire work, the subject of the statements, the setting, and the format of the work. Next they turn to the specific context and content of the statements, analyzing the extent of figurative or hyperbolic language used and the reasonable expectations of the audience in that particular situation. Finally, they inquire whether the statement itself is sufficiently factual to be susceptible of being proved true or false. See Partington v. Bugliosi, 56 F.3d 1147, 1153 (9th Cir.'94) (applying three-factor test as the starting point for analysis); Unelko Corp. v. Rooney, 912 F.2d 1049, 1053 (9th Cir.'90), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 961 (1991).

'[T]he First Amendment requires that the courts allow latitude for interpretation.' Partington, 56 F.3d at 1154 (quoting Moldea v. New York Times Co., 22 F.3d 310, 315 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 202 (1994)).

The speaking slanderous words of a person so as to hurt his good fame.

In the United States, the remedy for defamation is by an action on the case, where the words are slanderous.
yumpop
quote:
Originally posted by Scoops
Frankie says otherwise


Frankie knows what it was about, tell him cp says hi.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 
Privacy Statement