|
so is anyone thinking about WMC 2011? (pg. 6)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| get nyce |
| quote: | Originally posted by Scoops
Frankie says otherwise |
she thinks no one knows , needs to get out of here with that elite mentality
hold on a second lemme throw out words like attorney and defamation maybe they'll know i'm for reals...or maybe if i use the word a few more times to emphasize how mad i is |
|
|
| Scoops |
| quote: | Originally posted by yumpop
Do not ing threaten me, you are very misinformed about me. You are making comments that are not true. You like this scene, you like parties? I will put you on blast with every promoter and club owner in the scene. People don't like when lies are made especially about what you are saying. You are going too far and you are really going to ing learn who I am. I will ing sue you for defamation for making like this up. I will have your information subpoenaed, you are going to be ed. I strongly suggest you stop making up. |
 |
|
|
| yumpop |
| quote: | Originally posted by AMMORA
you wouldn't have much of a case...might as well just CHILL OUT
DEFAMATION
An act of communication that causes someone to be shamed, ridiculed, held in contempt, lowered in the estimation of the community, or to lose employment status or earnings or otherwise suffer a damaged reputation. Such defamation is couched in 'defamatory language'. Libel and slander are defamation.
Although defamation is primarily governed by state law, the First Amendment safeguards for freedom of speech and press limit state law. New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 264 (1964); Masson, 501 U.S. at 510. The scope of constitutional protection extends to statements of opinion on matters of public concern that do not contain or imply a provable factual assertion. Milkovich, 497 U.S. at 20 (rejecting categorical exemption of all statements in form of opinion; statement that may imply verifiable assertion of fact is actionable).
To determine whether a statement implies a factual assertion, courts examine the totality of the circumstances in which it was made. First, they look at the statement in its broad context, which includes the general tenor of the entire work, the subject of the statements, the setting, and the format of the work. Next they turn to the specific context and content of the statements, analyzing the extent of figurative or hyperbolic language used and the reasonable expectations of the audience in that particular situation. Finally, they inquire whether the statement itself is sufficiently factual to be susceptible of being proved true or false. See Partington v. Bugliosi, 56 F.3d 1147, 1153 (9th Cir.'94) (applying three-factor test as the starting point for analysis); Unelko Corp. v. Rooney, 912 F.2d 1049, 1053 (9th Cir.'90), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 961 (1991).
'[T]he First Amendment requires that the courts allow latitude for interpretation.' Partington, 56 F.3d at 1154 (quoting Moldea v. New York Times Co., 22 F.3d 310, 315 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 202 (1994)).
The speaking slanderous words of a person so as to hurt his good fame.
In the United States, the remedy for defamation is by an action on the case, where the words are slanderous. |
According to my attorneys who have already seen this thread and have taken screen shots, I do. He is making comments that are not true and defamatory. You need to sit down and shut the up. |
|
|
| Scoops |
| quote: | Originally posted by get nyce
she thinks no one knows , needs to get out of here with that elite mentality |
the elitiest menatlity sucks...its sooo 2002 |
|
|
| Scoops |
| quote: | Originally posted by yumpop
According to my attorneys who have already seen this thread and have taken screen shots, I do. He is making comments that are not true and defamatory. You need to sit down and shut the up. |
 |
|
|
| get nyce |
TO EVERYONE FOLLOWING THIS THREAD
I'll leave it be...
And Alex,
here's a screen shot for you
YOU IM DONE |
|
|
| get nyce |
and incase the screen shot didn't work you can have it twice on one image
YOU YUMPOP KKK YOU |
|
|
| AMMORA |
| this is the weakest thread in TA history...If i were a lawyer and all i had to do on a Thursday was look at screenshots for some crazy nut on a forum I'd jump off a building..what a waste.. |
|
|
| get nyce |
| quote: | Originally posted by yumpop
According to my attorneys who have already seen this thread and have taken screen shots, I do. He is making comments that are not true and defamatory. You need to sit down and shut the up. |
this has me dying laughing, you dumb bitch
imaginary friends giving you advice, bad idea
btw you're probably learning to not with me kthnxbye don't cry it's just the internet |
|
|
| yumpop |
| quote: | Originally posted by AMMORA
this is the weakest thread in TA history...If i were a lawyer and all i had to do on a Thursday was look at screenshots for some crazy nut on a forum I'd jump off a building..what a waste.. |
It is called relationship management and billable time, why wouldn't they want to? You are so incredibly clueless. This isn't some bull like oh my goodness Tiestooooo thread. |
|
|
| AMMORA |
SERIOUSLY? SERIOUSLY!? someone tell me they've met this nut and seen him/her cracked out at a party in a pool of urine and lock-jaw from teeth grinding...
I get this as a PM, my response is below it:
[quote]
yumpop wrote on Today 14:50:
I am a Wealth Management Advisor accused of selling and partying on a public forum where the NYPD street crimes and drug units read threads to get info on parties to shut down. This is not some bumble hood, it is very serious. They could get my ip and investigate me over a lie. I could lose my entire career. The people on ta that know this are serious, this is too much.
WHY THE F*CK ARE YOU ON AN ONLINE FORUM to begin with. I call bull bull bull. You've lost your mind seriously, I know i'm dealing with a certifiable NUT. Let me tell ya something honey, ANYONE can get your IP address if they want to, especially your bosses...if you weren't trolling around TA talking to people about your personal dealings you wouldn't have this issue. I gotta wonder who from TA saw you cracked out at a party one night to come to these excellent conclusions on their own without you providing ANY essential details to confirm it. Paranoia is a primary sign of drug abuse. |
|
|
| Scoops |
 |
|
|
|
|
