|
What genre would this fall under?
|
View this Thread in Original format
| RebeL9 |
Supersaw house?
It was painful at least. |
|
|
| srussell0018 |
| And why do you think so? |
|
|
| RebeL9 |
| Because I had a listen and I think it was painful. Should there be any other reason? |
|
|
| srussell0018 |
| Just curious as to what was painful about it to you, |
|
|
| RebeL9 |
| The stupid alarm sound, the extreamly annoying supersaw, the awful sidechain. |
|
|
| srussell0018 |
| You sound like an extremely unimaginative mad-libs. |
|
|
| RebeL9 |
| Yeah just like that song. |
|
|
| srussell0018 |
| Ooh that was good |
|
|
| Voci |
I guess we should label it with something new, as the word 'trance' (which has long ago already lost its meaning) is now, taking it to the max, with all fusions with house etc.
Jochen Miller is claiming it should be just tagged as 'bigroom'.
Good suggestion? |
|
|
| stevö |
production tehniques preferences and sound trend preferences aside, this is a type of house you cant find too easily. i made a thread recently looking for "trance house" but didnt get many good examples. maybe im dumb and havent found it yet, but i think this is a market just waiting to be tapped.
basically just take all the happy and epic characteristics of trance and put them into a 128ish house bpm. why dont more producers do this?
grouping music by tempo makes a dj's life way easier (mine anyway).
here's the possibilities of where i can take my mix when it comes to house: nu disco, indie electro, deep house, tech house, minimal tech house, techno, funky, diplo.
here's the possibilities for a trance mix: epic trance, old school trance, tech trance, psy trance. not a lot to choose from. :-/
the sound/struct palette of sub genres of trance is much more narrow compared to house.
trance is like macs, canadians, and amway people: theres way less support for the platform, they're a weird minority fringe group, they're a cult.
trance was great because there were big room orchestral arrangements and melodies that you can still remember 10-15 years later. that stuff still has not been incorporated into house yet.
i think theres some science behind it; in the war of genres over the past 20 years, trance vs house vs dnb ... why did house prevail as the clear winner that continues to dominate as the edm format of choice for most clubbers and djs? i think the key is tempo. house tempo is more versatile, it works in a drug setting but also an alcohol setting. for example: trance really works better when drugs are involved, its hard to get an alcohol only crowd into it unless the crowd are die hards already into trance. put it this way, what genre are you going to have a better chance of winning over a hip hop alcohol crowd? trance or house? definitely house. with house, just an example, you can play electro or minimal for the drug crowd, and deep house or nu disco for the alcohol crowd.
so the house tempo i think its safe to say is the tempo that won. now its just a matter of time when all the best ideas in trance over the years can be put into house. |
|
|
| Voci |
| quote: | Originally posted by stevö
production tehniques preferences and sound trend preferences aside, this is a type of house you cant find too easily. i made a thread recently looking for "trance house" but didnt get many good examples. maybe im dumb and havent found it yet, but i think this is a market just waiting to be tapped.
basically just take all the happy and epic characteristics of trance and put them into a 128ish house bpm. why dont more producers do this?
grouping music by tempo makes a dj's life way easier (mine anyway).
here's the possibilities of where i can take my mix when it comes to house: nu disco, indie electro, deep house, tech house, minimal tech house, techno, funky, diplo.
here's the possibilities for a trance mix: epic trance, old school trance, tech trance, psy trance. not a lot to choose from. :-/
the sound/struct palette of sub genres of trance is much more narrow compared to house.
trance is like macs, canadians, and amway people: theres way less support for the platform, they're a weird minority fringe group, they're a cult.
trance was great because there were big room orchestral arrangements and melodies that you can still remember 10-15 years later. that stuff still has not been incorporated into house yet.
i think theres some science behind it; in the war of genres over the past 20 years, trance vs house vs dnb ... why did house prevail as the clear winner that continues to dominate as the edm format of choice for most clubbers and djs? i think the key is tempo. house tempo is more versatile, it works in a drug setting but also an alcohol setting. for example: trance really works better when drugs are involved, its hard to get an alcohol only crowd into it unless the crowd are die hards already into trance. put it this way, what genre are you going to have a better chance of winning over a hip hop alcohol crowd? trance or house? definitely house. with house, just an example, you can play electro or minimal for the drug crowd, and deep house or nu disco for the alcohol crowd.
so the house tempo i think its safe to say is the tempo that won. now its just a matter of time when all the best ideas in trance over the years can be put into house. |
Sounds like an american answer. |
|
|
|
|
