Originally posted by shaw
get ready for the "pre-recorded music" battle
The very same music will have to be played live. Like I did:
LinX
quote:
Originally posted by Moongoose
Excellent if it means that raves are like this again. Pick a place, hijack it for the night rave until morning than disappear into the morning sun.
its so hard to get away with this now days. especially where i live anyway.
tubularbills
quote:
Originally posted by shaw
get ready for the "pre-recorded music" battle
:stongue: :stongue: that was my first thought. just make sure it's pre-recorded. problem solved.
isn't burning man in california? or is that nevada?
pwnage1
quote:
Originally posted by EddieZilker
The bill makes it illegal to hold an event containing more than 3 1/2 hours of pre-recorded music during the course of a night, with fines up to “$10,000 or twice the actual or estimated gross receipts for the event, whichever is greater.”
Better not let your wedding run on too long. Any concert that has music in the bar is ed too. What about all the pop stars who lip sync? Good thing movies are only two hours these days. Just ruined a lot of kids High school proms. This is going to create a law that we get to pick and choose when to enforce. Anyways, i doubt it will pass.
PivotTechno
Hey look everyone, Fiona Ma held a big NYE bash with a DJ playing 6 1/2 hours of prerecorded music!
Feel free to message this obviously mentally deficient individual on FB, perhaps taking a moment to explain what massive, over-the-top hypocrisy means.
Zyklon_Jay
this act won't pass because raves haven't existed since the 90's.
WittyHandle
quote:
Originally posted by Zyklon_Jay
this act won't pass because raves haven't existed since the 90's.
quote:
Originally posted by WittyHandle
but it's all night one offs with music by DJs, so aside from the nostalgia how is it different?
Zyklon_Jay
because they are not supposed to be sterile with shiny packaging.
floyd741
quote:
Originally posted by Zyklon_Jay
because they are not supposed to be sterile with shiny packaging.
When was the last time you went to something called a rave? Sure, clubbing is the sterile/shiny packaging deal, but I've been to plenty of parties where it's not quite so squeaky clean. You gotta find some outdoor bag, people freakin out in the in dirt and . Of course, most of them are inside, but even so I wouldn't consider some of the places I've gone to to be very shiny.
Zharen
quote:
Originally posted by chlola
SF has more 'death by RAVE' than LA.
Besides some of LA's politicions have vested interests in Raving.
It's all about the benjamins, Baby! ;)
I just think it's laughable that bankrupt CA can even think they can enforce something like this. There's still an active rave community up in the North Bay/Marin county area where the kids throw outdoor renegades and limited capacity ug's. Even in Modesto and the Sac area, the scenes here have started to blow up, even though most of the music is . Maybe the state should worry about earning more capital for their hugely bloated deficits before trying to make more things illegal. You can't fine your way out of this hole. Stupid state legislatures.
Zyklon_Jay
quote:
Originally posted by floyd741
When was the last time you went to something called a rave? Sure, clubbing is the sterile/shiny packaging deal, but I've been to plenty of parties where it's not quite so squeaky clean. You gotta find some outdoor bag, people freakin out in the in dirt and . Of course, most of them are inside, but even so I wouldn't consider some of the places I've gone to to be very shiny.
