|
Deep and Progressive House Synths? (pg. 4)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| shane_w1 |
I was just trying to explain my point...if people are trying to scrutinize or patronize anything I say then how can we work together?Im not claiming to be effective or smarter in any way shape or form and I don't need any credibility just im a f*cking hard-worker man and I fight my way to help anything/anyone and want to better myself in anything I do.
If I can't explain myself by offering advice or justifying my reasons through things like the IEEE workbook or equations without a backlash then there's no point.
On serious-sounds forum, the views are shared and sometimes explained further in depth by other people who want to get involved, I do the same thing on here and it's SLAMMED but yet none of you can offer an alternative...just "Oh it's easy, just do it this way" when it doesn't help any newbies or people who do not understand what they're in for, least im trying to help peolpe and by that passing on knowledge that i've picked up from other people...im not born with the knowledge and don't try to pretend, I just love exchanging ideas and learning from people but I doubt im gonna' get that from here, my concepts are not the greatest and neither are my sounds but im always striving for further...I think people who are jaded or are "Haters" in the Music Community remain stagnant and therefore cannot grow as they choose to create boundaries and anything that attacks that boundary gets shot-down before they begin, they cannot learn. |
|
|
| Mad for Brad |
please post an equation where wave length = (function of wave)
Here , please isolate lambda and make it equal to the equation it is already an essential element of the function. u can use the equation of a generic sinusoidal.
good luck you dumb sack of . |
|
|
| djritchie |
lol - what a pissing contest this has turned in to!
I tend to start with a preset - reverse engineer it; then customise it into exactly the sound I want.
You will learn a lot from this technique regardless of sound engineering knowledge! |
|
|
| arskinetica |
That's how I learned.
And also by experimenting from the ground up.
Trying to recreate sounds from records you like is great too. You may not get spot on, but you can learn something. |
|
|
| EddieZilker |
| quote: | Originally posted by shane_w1
I was just trying to explain my point...if people are trying to scrutinize or patronize anything I say then how can we work together?Im not claiming to be effective or smarter in any way shape or form and I don't need any credibility just im a f*cking hard-worker man and I fight my way to help anything/anyone and want to better myself in anything I do.
If I can't explain myself by offering advice or justifying my reasons through things like the IEEE workbook or equations without a backlash then there's no point.
On serious-sounds forum, the views are shared and sometimes explained further in depth by other people who want to get involved, I do the same thing on here and it's SLAMMED but yet none of you can offer an alternative...just "Oh it's easy, just do it this way" when it doesn't help any newbies or people who do not understand what they're in for, least im trying to help peolpe and by that passing on knowledge that i've picked up from other people...im not born with the knowledge and don't try to pretend, I just love exchanging ideas and learning from people but I doubt im gonna' get that from here, my concepts are not the greatest and neither are my sounds but im always striving for further...I think people who are jaded or are "Haters" in the Music Community remain stagnant and therefore cannot grow as they choose to create boundaries and anything that attacks that boundary gets shot-down before they begin, they cannot learn. |
We're only taking issue with the authoritative tone you're presenting with in conjunction with some rather inaccurate information. Unless you plan on ducking out as a "victim" for our nefarious pedantry, I'd suggest cultivating the credibility you seem to have dispensed with. No one except for you knows what are hard-working man you really are and, quite honestly, nobody cares.
Furthermore, you have yet to sell anyone on the seriousness of Serious Sounds. It looks more like a cerebral play-scape for people who want validation for whatever egocentric dysentery spews from the vodka-soaked essence of their pickled intellects; lots of fireworks but no real substance. A little self-awareness from you would go a long way to undoing that.
Instead, you're jacked up in this thread, claiming to be "SLAMMED" for not being accountable. When you present yourself as an expert, making authoritative declarations on every SW synthesizer on the market and then get caught out on a fundamental detail, acting like a whiny baby who's been criticized unfairly isn't exactly extolling any of your more worthwhile virtues. I'd suggest you try harder, but I'm only counting on you trying harder to defend your untenable position as though it could somehow be made unassailable. |
|
|
| shane_w1 |
Right so visualize a X and Y axis
X axis is the (Wavelength) Lambda
Y axis is the Distance
Waves have mathematical properties such as Time and Frequency that can be analyzed to understand the wave be it a Mechanical eg Longitudinal wave which are waves that have the same direction of where the vibrations are going (imagine a ripple effect in the Ocean)
***Sound waves*** (Could be a ing Sine wave for all who give a sh*t) are where the particles are pushed along in the direction of travel are a perfect example of a longitudinal wave.
Without the actual Wavelength formula, a Sine wave would not exist to accompany the theory of a Longutidinal wave as it would not be able to transfer the signals across the axis to work out the measurements of the Wave. Sine wave is the example used as it's the most common and basic Wave form in Science/Maths.
The fundamental principles and catalyst for a Wave Form to examined are based on those current properties (Frequency, Time, Distance etc.)
Therefore the Wavelength determins what the actual wave-form will be.
I mean, this is just basic principles ffs...it's nothing even spectacular and completely found everywhere...if you want me to go into the de Broglie theory then it's wavelengths (wave number) will determine the sum of the wave be it Sine, Cosine etc. whatever
Equation for wave form lies heavily upon the characteristics of the wavelength, it's just there as a basic principle.
I don't know how possibly your looking at it but that's what i've got as my material for my old assignments, a wavelength is the catalyst for the waveform in it's basic term otherwise it cannot determine what the wave form will be. |
|
|
| Mad for Brad |
| it is part of the equation, not the equation. You will never find anyone with a degree in physics or math that will tell you a sine wave is its wave length. That is just asinine. PLease express a simple sine wave in terms of wavelength or period if they are the same. They aren't. |
|
|
| shane_w1 |
| quote: | Originally posted by EddieZilker
We're only taking issue with the authoritative tone you're presenting with in conjunction with some rather inaccurate information. Unless you plan on ducking out as a "victim" for our nefarious pedantry, I'd suggest cultivating the credibility you seem to have dispensed with. No one except for you knows what are hard-working man you really are and, quite honestly, nobody cares.
Furthermore, you have yet to sell anyone on the seriousness of Serious Sounds. It looks more like a cerebral play-scape for people who want validation for whatever egocentric dysentery spews from the vodka-soaked essence of their pickled intellects; lots of fireworks but no real substance. A little self-awareness from you would go a long way to undoing that.
Instead, you're jacked up in this thread, claiming to be "SLAMMED" for not being accountable. When you present yourself as an expert, making authoritative declarations on every SW synthesizer on the market and then get caught out on a fundamental detail, acting like a whiny baby who's been criticized unfairly isn't exactly extolling any of your more worthwhile virtues. I'd suggest you try harder, but I'm only counting on you trying harder to defend your untenable position as though it could somehow be made unassailable. |
I've spoke to about 5 Producers tonight who have all agreed on what i've said and just said "leave TA forum alone, we do it alone now"...I can see there opinions and im just following suit...the concepts are crazy from this site...Serious Sounds has incredible recognition, Engineers and Artists signed/worked with WB and other Major Labels such as EMI...Artists signed to Flashover Recordings, Blackhole and Armada...plays from top DJ's like Carl Cox, Sasha, Digweed, Cattaneo, Ferry Corsten, Patterson etc. it's an incredible website...this seems very territorial and weak in it's essence of what it stands for. |
|
|
| MrJiveBoJingles |
:p |
|
|
| shane_w1 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Mad for Brad
it is part of the equation, not the equation. You will never find anyone with a degree in physics or math that will tell you a sine wave is its wave length. That is just asinine. PLease express a simple sine wave in terms of wavelength or period if they are the same. They aren't. |
It's the whole property to determine what the outcome of the wave-form will be...without it there is no wave-form, it is the whole outcome...no other property can determine the outlay for it....what is that you don't understand?Even that is what I learn from my 1st lesson...actually, you never, ever will unless it comes from "DJ Hate and scrutinize everything I want to" or "DJ Acid-Jam" |
|
|
| MrJiveBoJingles |
Stupid transparency...
Here you go:
|
|
|
| Mad for Brad |
you are saying a waveform = its wavelength.
that is like saying the area of a shape equals its length. It is only part of the equation you dumb mother******. |
|
|
|
|
