|
congratulations to president Putin !!! (pg. 7)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Xavier Moriarty |
[QUOTE]Originally posted by jon jon
haha I guess I missed that thread - I have a political science degree
[QUOTE]
LOL. wow... what the did they teach you in that political science schoolÉÉÉ
lol |
|
|
| jon jon |
i'm chill bro!  |
|
|
| FunkyCrew |
love exraver's "argument" - you know nothing but I do, type of a guy, lol
don't ing bring the same y argument as you use on hlam okey? with "brought here in kotomka" bs
looks like your own sources are CNN/BBC news since you have no clue about blogs and vblogs that real people living there write/post in, who took part in the marches back there, who voted this past election and have absolutely no faith in the future of the country - between these 2 msg boards are you even aware of other social media sources?
f you with your last century/grand parents in Ukraine kinda crap
Sash - you need to chill, between this and the Deadmau5 thread, you'll go completely white - mir, zhvachka, druzhba |
|
|
| Sasha |
| quote: | Originally posted by FunkyCrew
Sash - you need to chill, between this and the Deadmau5 thread, you'll go completely white - mir, zhvachka, druzhba |
lmao. this comment makes as much sense as other crap you posted earlier. ZERO |
|
|
| FunkyCrew |
| quote: | Originally posted by Sasha
lmao. this comment makes as much sense as other crap you posted earlier. ZERO |
the amount of rebuttal it got just proved my point :stongue: |
|
|
| Nicolas Oliver |
| The OP is a joke, right? |
|
|
| Sasha |
| quote: | Originally posted by FunkyCrew
the amount of rebuttal it got just proved my point :stongue: |
lol keep your comments coming. they are entertaining :) I have yet to hear any facts. |
|
|
| FunkyCrew |
| still no facts from you either :) |
|
|
| hardcore trancer |
Good article on this subject. Long but def worth reading:
http://www.voltairenet.org/Putin-Wins-Overwhelmingly
| quote: |
Putin Wins Overwhelmingly
In his boiled-down style, Stephen Lendman eviscerates the specious claims of election fraud trotted out by Western "media scoundrels" to discredit Vladimir Putin’s irrefutable victory. At issue is not the transparency of the electoral process, but the turning point marked by Putin’s comeback as a leading statesman that will hold his ground on the international scene. It heralds the end of a uni-polar system ruled over by the United States, Israel and NATO in outrageous disregard of international law, on which there is no going back.
Putin’s outspokenness won’t stop. He’ll continue saying “nobody can impose anything on us” and opposing Western efforts “to destroy Russia."
"Today our people have proven that such scenarios are not going to work in our country.”
Pre-election polls predicted around a 60% majority.
Final results show Putin won 63.6% of the vote. He got a clear third term mandate. In 2004, he won 71%.
Five candidates contended:
United Russia’s Vladimir Putin
The Communist Party’s Gennady Zyuganov
The Liberal Democratic Party’s Vladimir Zhirinovsky
Just Russia’s Sergey Mironov
Independent candidate Mikhail Prokhorov (billionaire/Russia’s third richest man)
With nearly all votes counted, official results were as follows:
Putin: 63.6%
Zyuganov: 17.2%
Prokhorov: 7.9%
Zhirinovsky: 6.2%
Mironov: 3.9%
Turnout was 63.3%. It exceeded December’s parliamentary elections.
Opponents allege fraud. So do major media scoundrels. At issue isn’t who won or lost. Nor is it about a fair or fraudulent process. America’s electoral system is hopelessly corrupted and broken, yet media giants praise it.
They also cheerlead America’s imperial agenda. As a result, they reject Putin’s opposition along with China, Venezuela, Cuba, Iran, perhaps Brazil and India, and others fed up with what harms their interests.
Putin’s especially outspoken. He accused America of living beyond its means “like a parasite” harming the global economy. He also called dollar dominance a threat to financial markets. If America’s in “systemic malfunction” it affects everyone, he added.
In 2003, he denounced Washington’s Iraq war, saying:
“The use of force abroad, according to existing international laws, can only be sanctioned by the United Nations. This is the international law. Everything that is done without the UN Security Council’s sanction cannot be recognised as fair or justified.”
“I am being as restrained as I can be when I choose these words,” he added. “There were no international terrorists under Hussein,” nor WMDs.
In 2007, he condemned Washington’s quest for unipolar global dominance “through a system which has nothing to do with democracy.” He added that Western powers are keen to teach Russia about it, but don’t practice it themselves. [1]
He said post-Cold War armed conflicts and casualties exceeded prior eras. He added that we’re “witnessing an almost uncontained hyper-use of military force in international relations.”
America spurns international norms and principles. It initiated a reckless arms race. It “overstepped its national borders in almost all spheres.” As a result, no one’s secure.
In 2011, he condemned US/NATO’s Libya war, saying:
“The Security Council resolution is deficient and flawed. It allows everything, and is reminiscent of a medieval call for a crusade. It effectively allows intervention in a sovereign state.”
It’s becoming a “trend,” he added. “Now it’s Libya’s turn – under the pretext of protecting civilians. Where is the logic and conscience? There is neither. The ongoing events in Libya confirm that Russia is right to strengthen her defense capabilities.”
Now he’s warning against foreign intervention in Syria, saying “Moscow won’t allow anyone to repeat the Libyan scenario….” He also firmly opposes attacking Iran. Last month he accused Washington of “diktat imperialism,” and said Russia will respond accordingly.
He’s rightfully concerned about US bases encircling Russia, as well as encroaching offensive missile defense systems. His outspokenness shows he’s drawn red line opposition to America’s global imperial agenda. As president, he’s also supreme commander-in-chief in charge of military and foreign policy, especially national security matters.
Hollow Fraud Accusations
They falsely raged after last December’s parliamentary elections. Irregularities always occur. At issue is whether results are influenced. Russia’s were minor. Its Central Election Commission (CEC) mentioned inconsequential invisible ink, illegal propaganda, and “merry-go-round” voting incidents.
The invisible ink scheme was uncovered and stopped. “Merry-go-round” fraud was grossly exaggerated. Without evidence, major media scoundrels claimed otherwise.
Independent (CEC-invited) international monitors checked voting in over 30 Russian regions. They concluded the process was calm and orderly. Polish monitor Mateus Piskorski said, “All complaints are about technical issues and not about violations of election law.”
Institute for Democracy and Cooperation director of studies John Laughland called electoral procedures “absolutely excellent.” He added that polling station workers were “extremely competent.”
On March 4, RT headlined, “Foreign observers laud Russian monitoring system as ‘best in the world,’ ” saying:
Thousands of Russian and foreign observers monitored polling stations throughout the voting process. Moreover, an elaborate Webcam system let anyone do it online. In fact, election officials said over two million people registered online to monitor voting live as it occurred. International monitors said it “exceeded everything they saw in their home countries – or anywhere else in the world.”
They also agreed that “elections were held in a normal mode and without serious violations.” In addition, they praised the Webcam system. Italian independent observer Alessandro Mussolini said:
“Judging by the results of our visits to the polling stations, we can make a statement that the Russian video monitoring system exceeds all international standards. It is wonderful that this complicated election mechanism is working.”
Bulgarian monitor Milan Bozhevich added:
“Everything was, well, transparent and open. Russia has opened a new page in history today – there is a broadcast of the Russian elections all over the world.”
Others made similar comments. Serbia’s Tomislav Nikolich called it a “full level of democracy,” what his country’s elections lack.
One Dagestan polling station was troublesome. Instances of multiple voting occurred. In response, results were nullified. Russia’s Interior Ministry reported no other serious violations.
At 5:30PM Moscow time (17.5 hours after polls opened in Russia’s Far East), 86 complaints were received. In total after voting ended, 460 were registered. According to CEC’s deputy chairman Stanislav Vavilov:
“We have information that hundreds of complaints have been written and will be submitted to the CEC in the near future. These complaints have been written in advance (prior to the March 4 poll).”
Interviewed by RT, Adrian Salbuchi from Buenos Aires called Putin’s momentous victory "a break against a neo-colonial West."
|
|
|
|
| Sasha |
| quote: | Originally posted by FunkyCrew
still no facts from you either :) |
lol
My fact is that Putin won the elections and none of the accusations against this fact have evidence. The better he does, the more Western world will try to interfere and hire "insiders" to bring him down. HAppy brainwashing Funky! im out of this |
|
|
|
|
