|
Errors are not in the art but in the artificers (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| TheTrinity |
| waiting for examples. any takers? any challengers worthy of the quest for truth? |
|
|
| TheTrinity |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
Indeed :p
Well, at least alchemy in its most successful forms led to chemistry :D
lol @ Moor:p
And it could well be true that the world ends tomorrow. It's just unlikely... if it does end, though, I just hope it ends on the hands of a dubstep-playing alien armada. |
it is unlikely that the human society-virus destroying the planet would be allowed by nature to continue without proper restoration of order of life. there is no room for evil in nature, therefor, there is no room for evil in humanity. |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by TheTrinity
waiting for examples. any takers? any challengers worthy of the quest for truth? |
 |
|
|
| OrangestO |
| quote: | Originally posted by TheTrinity
mathematics is a fantasy land where 1 = 1.
find me an example in the real world where 1 = 1. |
:stongue:
Amen Brotha. |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
| quote: | Originally posted by TheTrinity
waiting for examples. any takers? any challengers worthy of the quest for truth? |
the energy required to raise system A by 1 dB is the same energy required to raise system A by 1 dB |
|
|
| TheTrinity |
| quote: | Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
the energy required to raise system A by 1 dB is the same energy required to raise system A by 1 dB |
are you running two system A's at the same time.
or are you running two trials of the same system A, at different points in time? |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
| system A is one item. It is referring to itself. So at the same time, in the same conditions. |
|
|
| TheTrinity |
| quote: | Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
system A is one item. It is referring to itself. So at the same time, in the same conditions. |
system A = system A only when:
time = absolute 0.
as soon as energy is added to the system and time begins in the trial, system A = function of (system A) |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
time is irrelevant. The system refers to itself.
and your equation
graph it out. Oh look at that. 1 = 1. For a god, you suck at math. And music. And logic. |
|
|
| Lira |
| Right, because God as described in the Bible happened to be a genius :p |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
| well ty techno producer is a little esoteric for a god. I mean aren't gods omnipotent. I wonder what level of education trinity managed to achieve. I'm guessing a highschool equivalent at the age of 22. |
|
|
| TheTrinity |
| quote: | Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
time is irrelevant. The system refers to itself.
and your equation
graph it out. Oh look at that. 1 = 1. For a god, you suck at math. And music. And logic. |
one system A is only the same system A during this instance, when time equals zero.
system A is not system A after time is applied.
radiation, half-life, decay, and energy of the system are variable with time.
you have proved nothing of reality, since time exists, and it affects:
the radiation, half-life, decay, and energy of the system.
what you are proving is: during a specific instant where time is equal to 0, system A equals itself.
this is called an observation of what 1 (system A) is, at a specific instance where time is zero.
you can not measure time is zero, therefore you cannot measure the full properties of 1 (system A) at time equals zero.
you must measure the properties of 1 (system A) which require time to equal to a value other than 0.
as soon as time is run, 1 (system A) ceases to be 1 (system A). |
|
|
|
|
