Originally posted by Lira
Right, because God as described in the Bible happened to be a genius :p
have you read the Bible? if you do not know what words mean, dont assume you know what words mean.
Looney4Clooney
i'm not comparing system A to system A at another time interval you twat. Time is a variable that can be anything A(t) +Y = A(t) + Y
I gave you an example. Your own proof negates your statement. For the love of satan. You are using standard pseudo science / nut , moving the goal post is usually a sign you are dealing with an Icke like bat crazy moron. Not the cool one that would beat his wife.
Lira
quote:
Originally posted by TheTrinity
have you read the Bible? if you do not know what words mean, dont assume you know what words mean.
Yes, I have. As for semantics, that would be an awesome topic for debate.
Whence cometh meaning, oh Lord?
Looney4Clooney
the bible is pretty good if you read it as a homoerotic romance.
Lira
quote:
Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
the bible is pretty good if you read it as a homoerotic romance.
Just because the main character likes to travel to exotic locations with 12 sandal wearing sailors!?
Nah! Next thing you know he didn't preach about bliss and being the son of a happy and gay lord! :p
TheTrinity
quote:
Originally posted by Lira
Yes, I have. As for semantics, that would be an awesome topic for debate.
Whence cometh meaning, oh Lord?
you don't even understand what semantics is. lol
:)the place and time, for meaning is seize the day.
Looney4Clooney
paul was notorious for never being the receiver in their weekly friday 12 man glory hole.
TheTrinity
quote:
Originally posted by Lira
Just because the main character likes to travel to exotic locations with 12 sandal wearing sailors!?
Nah! Next thing you know he didn't preach about bliss and being the son of a happy and gay lord! :p
you read the words, that apply, you leave the rest behind.
TheTrinity
quote:
Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
i'm not comparing system A to system A at another time interval you twat. Time is a variable that can be anything A(t) +Y = A(t) + Y
I gave you an example. Your own proof negates your statement. For the love of satan. You are using standard pseudo science / nut , moving the goal post is usually a sign you are dealing with an Icke like bat crazy moron. Not the cool one that would beat his wife.
system A is system A IS NOT 1 equals 1.
1 is itself; it is what you have proven so far. nice try. better luck next time.
Lira
quote:
Originally posted by TheTrinity
you don't even understand what semantics is. lol
Forgive my ignorance, oh Prime Mover! Would you, happiest of all sirs, gayest of all lords, oh thunderous manifestation of jubilee amongst men, enlighten me as to what semantics is?
Shower me with thine knowledge! :gsmile:
TheTrinity
quote:
Originally posted by Lira
Forgive my ignorance, oh Prime Mover! Would you, happiest of all sirs, gayest of all lords, oh thunderous manifestation of jubilee amongst men, enlighten me as to what semantics is?
Shower me with thine knowledge! :gsmile:
semantics is the proper use of connections between words, proper uses of all words, and the laws of all words, to distinguish:
subjectivity, from the bias which causes it, from the objectivity that supports it, and the objectivity inside the depth of language.
Lira
quote:
Originally posted by TheTrinity
semantics is the proper use of connections between words, proper uses of all words, and the laws of all words, to distinguish:
subjectivity, from the bias which causes it, from the objectivity that supports it, and the objectivity inside the depth of language.
Very much obliged, oh radiant bacon of wisdom! This place was in dire need of someone like you, as you know about linguistics as much as the producers of this commercial know about China:
I bow before your excellence in awe and admiration. You make me tremble in anticipation of the next awesome feat of amazing oddness you will produce before our virginal eyes :gsmile:
