|
Trayvon Martin = RACIST Homophobe (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| srussell0018 |
| Wasn't Trayvon the one who attacked him, slamming his head into the ground? That sounds like self defense. |
|
|
| Marcus Summers |
| quote: | Originally posted by srussell0018
Wasn't Trayvon the one who attacked him, slamming his head into the ground? That sounds like self defense. |
No, the broken and bloody nose was just the racism pouring out of the aryan skinhead Zimmerman's noggin. |
|
|
| srussell0018 |
| I hope he walks. Trayvon clearly was the aggressor and Zimmerman was defending himself so that jiggaboo Martin didn't kill him. |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
| i just hope hope the San Francisco Zoo get koko back in custody. |
|
|
| DJ RANN |
Richie, you are killing me in this thread :haha:
The cracker jack(asses) in this thread don't have a ing clue; if Trayvon hadn't been purposely and directly accosted by Zimmerman, this entire situation would not be happening and Trayvon would still be alive.
Regardless of how you feel about either of these two whether gang banger in training was up for some action, or if Zimmerman the block cop was looking for a citizens arrest, he the latter had minded his own ing business, Trayvon would have got home that night (and it has already been clearly established that it was his usual route home, not a diversion to jack someone or their home).
That's the end of it right there. Someone dies in a bar fight? the guy who started goes down in 99% of cases. Zimmerman had no right to bring or pull on gun on the guy, when he's in public. End of story. Will he be convicted of 2nd degree? Doubtfull though. The prosecution are a ing joke. |
|
|
| srussell0018 |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
Zimmerman had no right to bring or pull on gun on the guy, when he's in public. |
Not according to the law of that state. |
|
|
| OrangestO |
BTW, that "cracker" slur was directed toward his friend on the phone, not directly at Zimmerman.
Keep reaching, folks. You obviously know what you're talking about. |
|
|
| srussell0018 |
| He was calling his black friend a cracker? |
|
|
| DJ RANN |
| quote: | Originally posted by srussell0018
Not according to the law of that state. |
Thanks for the gross oversimplification of the stand your ground law as well as something that now has nothing to do with the case.
If it had been applicable to him, there wouldn't there wouldn't have be a trial in the first place - he would have claimed immunity had it been applicable, but both he and his defense knew it wouldn't fly, so he plead self defense.
Why?
Because it wasn't stand your ground under the laws of florida.
Concealed gun? Yes. Protect yourself during a home invasion? Yes.
Follow a young guy in the street by car, Pull up, Bring your weapon with you from the car, then start a fight and shoot him? Not even close to stand your ground and hence why his defense has steered well clear of it.
Even if they were able to prove trayvon was up to something nefarious, he'd still be on trial as stand your ground does not allow you to shoot someone that hasn't first initiated a conflict with you. Zimm initiated it, so no get out clause. |
|
|
| srussell0018 |
| Trayvon started the fight and Zimmerman had every right to be carrying a gun. Next. |
|
|
| OrangestO |
| quote: | Originally posted by srussell0018
He was calling his black friend a cracker? |
I'm not even... |
|
|
|
|
