return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Music Discussion

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 
Which genre was bigger in 2001, Trance or Progressive? (pg. 3)
View this Thread in Original format
Lews
quote:
Originally posted by A.B
Not sure what you are defining as 'big' but during the 'golden era' period around 99 - early 00s it probably generated a load more money for DJs, producers, labels than any other genre since.

Trance was huge. There can be no denying it.
Different days now.


You think the DJ stars back then were regularly pulling in millions like the Vegas troupes do now?
SYSTEM-J
quote:
Originally posted by enydo
Was the division as big back then? I mean, I understand there were sorta "prog vs. trance" wars on these forums, but I was too late for most of that.

I'm just not sure how revisionist the whole prog vs. trance thing actually is.


I think the perception in other scenes was probably that the two were different sides of the same coin, but there was definitely a lot of mutual antipathy between trance and progressive in that era. Not just the fans but the DJs and even the inlays of mix compilations.
Syntonic
There were so many arguments on TA about which was better. I'd like to find some threads just to see who people described one being better than the other. The discussions would get pretty cutthroat.

Also good point about Trance DJs spinning Prog, it was pretty much the foundation of their sets.
2techs
this whole prog vs trance war started around 2002 on TA and it was still ongoing right when I was a noob on this site. Cobalt spearheaded the prog trance alliance. people claimed that progressive trance was a made-up tag that didn't exist and that all those tracks were progressive house. I applaud their zealotry.
A.B
quote:
Originally posted by enydo
Uhhhh I'm currently thinking of one. Blew up around 2010-2011, aftermath of which is still going on as "EDM"... no?


Can't possibly see how....

The 'Superclubs' during the period I mentioned were rammed every week / month.
DJs would spend £100 a week on vinyl easily.
Consider the numbers of albums that Gatecrasher, Godskitchen, Euphoria, GU, MOS sold.
Cd single sales were through the roof in HMV / Tower Records / Virgin.....

How much do you think a 'EDM' punter would spend a week on music? I bet it's not even an average of £20 a week.

The only factors where your argument would have any shred of substantiation is in regards to inflation. That or the fact that the distribution costs for music have plummeted due to the digital medium.

We could go one step further and argue that trance music is still making a reasonable cashflow from sales to this day.
A.B
quote:
Originally posted by Lews
You think the DJ stars back then were regularly pulling in millions like the Vegas troupes do now?


Yes.
enydo
Oh well you've totally convinced me.
Lews
quote:
Originally posted by enydo
Oh well you've totally convinced me.


This.

We have paycheck figures for the DJs now, making ridiculous sums. Show me higher paychecks for back then and I'll believe it.
A.B
quote:
Originally posted by Lews
This.

We have paycheck figures for the DJs now, making ridiculous sums. Show me higher paychecks for back then and I'll believe it.


As I've already said....... Inflation.

Of course the DJs pay is going to be higher today than the era I referred to
What did a can of Coke cost in 2000 and what does it cost today?

That aside, you have just established your own statement that 'trance was never as big as.....' to be completely without substance.
It was big.....ing huge and like it or not, still has it's place.
enydo
Check it out it's a little like US political rhetoric, you can just say "inflation" and hope people believe the you're spewing.

A.B
http://www.celebritynetworth.com/li...50-richest-djs/

That list is quite telling.....

Now when you add all the revenue that record labels made from releases amongst the other factors, I think you will find that several DJs in that list could easily be accountable for 'trance' to have generated as much revenue as it did which to counter your objective defines 'Big'
A.B
quote:
Originally posted by enydo
Check it out it's a little like US political rhetoric, you can just say "inflation" and hope people believe the you're spewing.


Not at all.
You simply don't have any substantial evidence to back what you state.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 
Privacy Statement