|
WarCraft 3:Frozen Throne
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Psy-Trancer |
| the bete sign ups are on...go to blizzard.com if u want to register for the beta....looks pretty fun..though im not crazy about the homesexual 3D world in war3..aw well |
|
|
| FennecTheFox |
W00T, WOOT.
Got the beta. :o |
|
|
| Blake613 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Psy-Trancer
im not crazy about the homesexual 3D world |
What? homosexual 3D world? |
|
|
| Psy-Trancer |
| ya the 3D animation jsut ruined the whole warcraft thingy....they better not do that to starcraft..:whip: |
|
|
| FennecTheFox |
The 3D graphics look good, but ruin the game because
Blizzard was basically forced to place a low unit cap (90 supply I believe vs Starcraft's 200?) on the game to keep the system specs low. |
|
|
| verminator |
the game ownz bigtime
just played some games
frozen throne is almost as a completly new game
amazing:D:D:D:D |
|
|
| verminator |
fennecthefox: the supply limet isnt at 90 because to keep the system specs low.. is to make the players more skillfull
its easy to win in bw, even when you are not good ,just as long as you have a mass horde of units..
in wc3 you can't just mass grunts or something.. its more strategy. more micro/macro
its a game that requires skills
sc/bw doesnt do that to a certain level.. |
|
|
| FennecTheFox |
Brood War required an infinite amount of more skill to master. It's not even comparable. Why do you think there are no definite unbeatable 1:1 players in Warcraft 3? Newbies can beat good players based on the way the game is designed. Major luck factor.
And yeah do you think that you could have 200/200 supply running around without the game going choppy? Give me a break.
I have a P4 1.8 and a pimpin' video card 512 ram and when it's 4:4 and there's a mass load of units on the screen with Blood Lust and spells flying every which way - my computer lags. Most people don't have computers as fast as I do.
War3 is a kiddy game.
Did you ever play either game at a top level?
I'm almost certain you never have based on your comments. |
|
|
| Srezic |
I just got the beta yesterday, though i've been playing a little on my friend's beta account before I got it. =P.
Though, i suck horribly anyway. I am just testing for bugs and such.
~Ryan |
|
|
| Psy-Trancer |
| its very easy to counter every mass attack in SC...so ya it does require strategy and micro....so wtv both games are chill but wtv we got our opigions |
|
|
| verminator |
| quote: | Originally posted by FennecTheFox
Brood War required an infinite amount of more skill to master. It's not even comparable. Why do you think there are no definite unbeatable 1:1 players in Warcraft 3? Newbies can beat good players based on the way the game is designed. Major luck factor.
And yeah do you think that you could have 200/200 supply running around without the game going choppy? Give me a break.
I have a P4 1.8 and a pimpin' video card 512 ram and when it's 4:4 and there's a mass load of units on the screen with Blood Lust and spells flying every which way - my computer lags. Most people don't have computers as fast as I do.
War3 is a kiddy game.
Did you ever play either game at a top level?
I'm almost certain you never have based on your comments. |
i played it at a top level for almost 3 years with ppl like slayer,skevihue/sven,mike,1st~tsunami,vanquor,rivan,tillerman (when he played it),ntt,etc++++++++++
so dont come here thinking you know too much. you prolly hadnt heard about the game when i played it
ive played a thousand times with 200/200 withtout lagging
i played the game when there wasnt a faster cpu than 600mhz, so dont come here talking about your p4 1.8ghz
and again, stop "bullting" about none undefeated players in wc3.. ofcourse there aint noeone who never have lost a game
do you actually think that there some of those in bw?
if you do, i gotta say that you got NO CLUE WHATSOEVER about bw
dont come here trying to teach me bw, i think i know i bit more than you do, unless you are a former good player , which again you gotta proove for me to believe you,as your statements seems like statements that could come from a noob who thinks that a person who got a stats like 1509-0-0 is the best bw player in the world |
|
|
| FennecTheFox |
| quote: | Originally posted by verminator
i played it at a top level for almost 3 years with ppl like slayer,skevihue/sven,mike,1st~tsunami,vanquor,rivan,tillerman (when he played it),ntt,etc++++++++++
Ok what was your nick name then? NTT/Sven/Tillerman and Tsunami know me quite well. I've played with most of those people.
and again, stop "bullting" about none undefeated players in wc3.. ofcourse there aint noeone who never have lost a game
do you actually think that there some of those in bw?
if you do, i gotta say that you got NO CLUE WHATSOEVER about bw
SlayersBoxer is a prime example of a player that can win the majority of his games. He can win consistently. Is there a player like that in Warcraft 3? That can win again and again? No. Not even close.
dont come here trying to teach me bw, i think i know i bit more than you do, unless you are a former good player , which again you gotta proove for me to believe you,as your statements seems like statements that could come from a noob who thinks that a person who got a stats like 1509-0-0 is the best bw player in the world |
-I was selected to play in the Game-Q world tournament (International tournament) to represent Canada
-Name a non-korean top player, and i've most likely beaten him.
-I've won thousands of dollars.
-#2 cases ladder SC/BW.
-#1 Cloud Ladder.
-Published strategy guide on the web.
-Winner of multiple small online tournaments.
-Regarded as one of the best Zerg players in the world.
Yeah, I know nothing though. :o
Why do you think hardly any of the top Korean Brood War players are touching Warcraft 3? 'cause they realize it's a skilless newbie game. |
|
|
|
|
