|
Liberation Alliance!!! (pg. 11)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| JM |
| quote: | Originally posted by fastmp3
too bad our little tiesto is reading this and dying of rage to answer but he can't ;) |
what makes you think that he doesn't have a second account. or a third? hmmm.....more than half the kids that i know on this forum (not incl. you;)) have at least a 2nd screen-name. kinda like a second identity. might post totally different opinions,..
as for me,...hmmm....:toothless
>JM<
;) |
|
|
| Mosaic |
roflmao.... the pro-war immaturity continues....
Interesting how you guys aren't out fighting because you support war so much.
And anyone who is ballsy enough to call this a "just" war, must not be paying attention to whats going on.
1. Bush has failed in EVERY way to make a connection between Al Quida, and Saddam.
2. Nobody has found any weapons of mass destruction. But of course, now it will be hard to tell whether or not anything found is authentic, but it is quite possible for the Coalition to stage it, just so they can say that war was "just"
3. The UN does not support the war.
4. Most of the world does not support this war.
But really, if you guys want to start an alliance, "just because those damn anti-war people did!", then go right ahead. But please remember, we're not anti-war, we are pro-peace. |
|
|
| Mosaic |
| quote: | Originally posted by nrjizer
Heh... I really love how some people on this forum expect others to take them seriously when they speak with the intelligence of 4th graders... you know who you are... or maybe not, if your ego's are so inflated. This is not directed at either pro or anti war folks specifically.
And now for my opinion... theres a difference between supporting the troops and supporting the war... simply supporting the troops means rooting for everyone in the allied arms services who are fighting this war regardless of whether or not they want to, or whether or not you believe in the war. Personally, I support the troops, but definately not the war. If Bush wants to go and kick Saddam out, give out some aid, then get on out of there (without raping them of their oil supplies), then I could agree with that morally, even tho it would still be illegial since the U.S. Constitution prohibits pre-emptive war. But you know... if Bush REALLY wanted to help poor people, why is he spending american lives on iraq? He could help more people and save more lives by taking the several-hundred BILLION dollars that this war will cost, and using it to help set up hospitials and food and everything else in many of the starving countries throughout the world. And where was Bush's sympathy for all the mass genocides in Africa? Or the things Mao did China? Or his concern about NKorea's nukes? Funny how you NEVER hear about these things on CNN or Fox or whatnot.
I recal hearing on NPR some interviews with iraqi's, whos general opinion was that if Bush wanted to come kick saddam out they would welcome him, but if U.S. expected to occupy their country and set up their own government and whatnot, then they had another thing coming. Does anyone remember in Bush's speech last week, when he gave iraqi militants a list of things not to do or have their asses kicked? First thing: dont destroy oil wells! Second, Dont use Weapons of Mass Destruction! Glad he has his priorities straight! Someone earlier in the thread already commented on Ashcrofts comment on the Iraqi oil (look back a few pages). And lets not forget the U.S's previous attempts at installing democracies. Chile? Guatemala? Vietnam? Iran? Iraq (previously)?.
Its funny how Clinton gets impeached for getting head in the oval office, but Bush gets away with wiping his ass with the Constitution. Not only is a pre-emptive war ILLEGIAL, the power to declare war lies only in congress, who bent over and handed over all that power to bush alone.
And all this War on TV is so ridiculous, it borders on comical. Every network plays the same hogwash 24/7, and all the same stories at the same time.. its like the Running Man or Fahrenheight 451 or something like that, your pretty much watching the war live on tv. They were even interviewing a pentagon official who said that they didnt get their initial damage reports from bombings from pilots or intelligence, but CNN! The media has people so desensitized, they dont realize that innocent iraqi citizens are effected drastically by all of this. Everyone gets worked up over reports of a lone allied soldier dying, but they probably barely flinch at a rogue report of iraqi's killed in a misguided bomb. Theyre people too, just like you or me, or the soldiers fighting over there. A lot of folks have seemed to have forgotton that...
But none of that really matters now, since we are already into it... if Bush just kicks out saddam, drops some aid, and then pulls out, then I can live with that, and Id be happy for the iraqi people, even tho Id still strongly disagree to the american (and british, austrailian, ect) lives risked and lost, and believe that he could have done a LOT more to help the helpless people throughout the world than just going after Iraq. I mean lets face it, Saddam is a head but hes not the only travesty going on in the world. I want to see Bush do more than just Iraq. Lets just hope that this war is over with soon with minimal deaths. |
well said, mate! |
|
|
| Dmatrox |
| quote: | Originally posted by fastmp3
too bad our little tiesto is reading this and dying of rage to answer but he can't ;) |
tiesto14 was hot headed. Dude control yourself, isnt this your second time of being banned?
Take is easy, dont be a hot head, control what you say. |
|
|
| USMC_Greg |
| quote: | Originally posted by Dmatrox
tiesto14 was hot headed. Dude control yourself, isnt this your second time of being banned?
Take is easy, dont be a hot head, control what you say. |
The problem is that there are infinite numbers that he can use.
Next will be tiesto15
by January 2005 we should be at tiesto3730 |
|
|
| DaveSaenz |
| quote: | Originally posted by JM
what makes you think that he doesn't have a second account. or a third? hmmm.....more than half the kids that i know on this forum (not incl. you;)) have at least a 2nd screen-name. kinda like a second identity. might post totally different opinions,..
as for me,...hmmm....:toothless
>JM<
;) |
I would stick by my statements, and never do that...
Besides it's easy for the mods etc. to tell I'm sure.:nervous: |
|
|
| DaveSaenz |
| quote: | Originally posted by USMC_Greg
The problem is that there are infinite numbers that he can use.
Next will be tiesto15
by January 2005 we should be at tiesto3730 |
So the 14 is the # of times he has been previously suspended??
haha. I admire his sticktoitiveness (not a word). :) |
|
|
| FuzzyGreen |
| Just wanted to blast my new sig in this thread... |
|
|
| MezzicanTrancEr |
| quote: | Originally posted by JohnSmith
maybe an image of a burning american flag would be more appropriate, but somehow, i think that would piss people off more. |
as i started to respond to your flag burning comment I saw where you were from...go figure...
how's the winter up in vancouver? hehe
God Bless our troops! |
|
|
| JohnSmith |
it's nice and rainy.
i don't believe in god, but i hope your troops are alright as well. |
|
|
| occrider |
| quote: | Originally posted by Mosaic
Interesting how you guys aren't out fighting because you support war so much.
|
So how many peace rallies have you been too? Also why aren't you out becoming a human shield if you support peace so much? If you support something does that mean you have to become an active participant of it? |
|
|
| DJ El Kay Dee |
| quote: | Originally posted by JohnSmith
it's nice and rainy.
i don't believe in god, but i hope your troops are alright as well. |
dont worry...u think all those u see chanting "God Bless America" or "God Bless Our Troops" really practice christiaity or whatever religion they follow???
they remember that their religion exists only at times such as christmas and to get married....otherwise they just use the Lords name in vain |
|
|
|
|
