return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Chill Out Room

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 
Does TA believe in "the right to die"
View this Thread in Original format
Stef
I guess this goes out to mostly the USA TAs but i was wondering what everyone thought.

"The term "right to die" refers to various issues related to the decision of whether an individual who could continue to live with the aid of life support, or in a diminished or enfeebled capacity, should be allowed to die. In some cases, it refers to the idea that a person with a terminal illness and in serious condition should be allowed to commit suicide before death would otherwise occur. The concept is often referred to as dying with dignity. The question of who–if anyone–should be empowered to make these decisions is often central to the debate."


So does Ta believe in the right to die?
Halcyon+On+On
God said it. I believe it. That settles it.
ziptnf
******** has spoken. There is no more need for discussion.
Halcyon+On+On
William, I want you to tell me of the Bauharoque.
yukii
quote:
Originally posted by Stef
So does Ta believe in the right to die?


yes.
floyd741
If you want to die you should be able to die. It's as simple as that (though I'm sure many would say it's not).
MeLLyMeL
it depends.

I get more upset that the husband gets all the right to chose if the wife should die or not, over immediate family.

If it's the person's sole decision then I would definitely back them as it is their life and their choice. (even if I may not agree with it)

It's such a touchy & depressing subject.
Theresa
quote:
Originally posted by floyd741
If you want to die you should be able to die. It's as simple as that (though I'm sure many would say it's not).


+1

I can't imagine having to suffer through cancer or some other terminal illness right up until the point my body simply gives up. If the person is willing and has access to an injection to let them pass pleasantly, why not?

I would rather my loved ones enjoy their last moments. Why not let them have it?
Silky Johnson
I believe in doing whatever is best for the patient. Primary emphasis in patient care is given to the right to choose, so if the patient is of the capacity to make that decision for his/herself, then their wishes should be honored.

Now, these types of ethical dilemmas get tricky when you consider that the term 'patient' is meant to include family members as well, and that bioethics is firmly rooted in utilitarianism.
MrJiveBoJingles
It also gets tricky in cases where the patient wants to die but does not actually have the power to kill himself. Should medical personnel or family members be legally forced to kill such a patient for the sake of "honoring the right to die?"

;)

Silky Johnson
edit: bah, gimme a minute, lol.
Silky Johnson
quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
It also gets tricky in cases where the patient wants to die but does not actually have the power to kill himself. Should medical personnel or family members be legally forced to kill such a patient for the sake of "honoring the right to die?"

;)





Yeah, I think using the word "forced" detracts from what a physician's duty actually is, and implies the consideration of personal values and beliefs. Physicians are seen as obligated to achieve the best possible health care outcome based on the 4 principles of bioethics - autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. I don't see what any of that has to do with one's personal beliefs on the matter.

Again, autonomy takes precedence. It is the foundation of current patient care. Not saying that makes it black and white...but I mean, how the physician feels about it is irrelevant.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 
Privacy Statement