|
Have you met someone online? (pg. 10)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Vert |
| quote: | Originally posted by Orbax
you actually just proved yourself more wrong than I could have at the moment. Cheers, and thanks. |
There goes your lowballing tactics. If I were wrong I would admit defeat. Do the same courtesey. Or proove why that is wrong. It is not a valid arguement to say some bull about how you are right and not proove it. I'm serious, proove your point intelligently without having to call names or say how stupid you think I am.
es |
|
|
| speedracer_mec |
u bunch of silicon valley geeks with plaided shirts and pocket protectors
stfu will ya!
 |
|
|
| Orbax |
| quote: | Originally posted by Vert
There goes your lowballing tactics. If I were wrong I would admit defeat. Do the same courtesey. Or proove why that is wrong.
es |
ok. the definition of the internet was something everyone could see but not use. If you are familiar with user groups and user admin tools at all you would know this. I can SEE microsoft networks, i juts dont have access because either my IP range or my username does not fit into any know acceptable user groups. That is an internet to me.
The peopel who walk into microsoft and clock in and type in their little user names are accessing the same thing that I see from my house, but they get access to it through user admin, thus they have an intra net because they are either in a virtual ip range or in the accepted range allocated by the admin. |
|
|
| Vert |
| quote: | Originally posted by Orbax
ok. the definition of the internet was something everyone could see but not use. If you are familiar with user groups and user admin tools at all you would know this. I can SEE microsoft networks, i juts dont have access because either my IP range or my username does not fit into any know acceptable user groups. That is an internet to me.
The peopel who walk into microsoft and clock in and type in their little user names are accessing the same thing that I see from my house, but they get access to it through user admin, thus they have an intra net because they are either in a virtual ip range or in the accepted range allocated by the admin. |
You just said exactly what I just said. How useless of an arguement we've had.:D
es |
|
|
| Orbax |
and to clarify, AGAIN, they ARE bounded by protocols. If you think otherwise, this converation is totally over. I can make a network that no one outside of the company could see, yet it reaced across the world. thats an internet. You couldnt see it though. so its an intra net?
also...do you know what youre talking about? I do. |
|
|
| Vert |
| quote: | Originally posted by speedracer_mec
u bunch of silicon valley geeks with plaided shirts and pocket protectors
stfu will ya!
|
Geeks own you.
es |
|
|
| smcmulli |
| becareful its not a man waiting to rape you ;) |
|
|
| Vert |
| quote: | Originally posted by Orbax
and to clarify, AGAIN, they ARE bounded by protocols. If you think otherwise, this converation is totally over. I can make a network that no one outside of the company could see, yet it reaced across the world. thats an internet. You couldnt see it though. so its an intra net?
also...do you know what youre talking about? I do. |
Yes they are bounded by protocols, but in the majority of the cases that is tcp/ip. That would be vpn or technology like that. If it is restricted I suppose it could be considered intranet. I'm not really into logistics.
Yes some intranets are accessible via the internet with the correct authorization, but that does not make them part of the internet. The internet by defintion is generally public.
es |
|
|
| Orbax |
| quote: | Originally posted by Vert
. The internet by defintion is generally public.
es |
actually the defnition of the internet is what I gave you from the dictionary...
and you said generally in your first statement again...i dont care if 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% of internet access is on THE internet, the other .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 is another internet and still accessed, meaning that more than 1 exist, and thus you are wrong. |
|
|
| Vert |
| quote: | Originally posted by Orbax
actually the defnition of the internet is what I gave you from the dictionary...
and you said generally in your first statement again...i dont care if 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% of internet access is on THE internet, the other .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 is another internet and still accessed, meaning that more than 1 exist, and thus you are wrong. |
It is all one internet. If it uses dns servers and its connected somewhere and is accessible in some way shape or form by the public its is the one internet. Find me a link that shows that there are more than one internet. Prove your statments, or they are nothing but hot air. Problem is, that there is not ".0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001%" out there.
Actually I gave the definition of the internet.."An interconnected system of networks that connects computers around the world via the TCP/IP protocol."
Start using links and proving , otherwise NOTHING you say makes any difference to me or anyone.
es |
|
|
| Orbax |
| quote: | Originally posted by Vert
It is all one internet. If it uses dns servers and its connected somewhere and is accessible in some way shape or form by the public its is the one internet. Find me a link that shows that there are more than one internet. Prove your statments, or they are nothing but hot air. Problem is, that there is not ".0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001%" out there.
es |
This is just one of those things you are wrong in. and you have no way of explaining your bull without using website definitions. You have never built a network, you arent currently buidling one, and you never will. If you can convince me why I should waste my time enlightening you, ill continue, but so far you sound like a ing 15 year old that shared his music drive to his parents and is all of a sudden a networking guru. |
|
|
| Vert |
| quote: | Originally posted by Orbax
This is just one of those things you are wrong in. and you have no way of explaining your bull without using website definitions. You have never built a network, you arent currently buidling one, and you never will. If you can convince me why I should waste my time enlightening you, ill continue, but so far you sound like a ing 15 year old that shared his music drive to his parents and is all of a sudden a networking guru. |
Now you are using lowballing insults again when I proove a point. I'm not asking you to stay here and have this 'conversation' with me. You don't know me, you cannot make those assumptions. Now you can say all the in the world but without backing it up its nothing. And if you cannot handle a simple contentious conversation without calling names and trying to imagine what my life is like, then you aren't mature enough. I use website definitions because it is proof. Without them we could go on and on for hours saying "I'm right you're wrong", "NO You are wrong I'm right". If you cannot understand that then you should have not been in this in the first place.
Wait, you are drunk. No wonder most of the things you said made little sense.
es |
|
|
|
|
